Dataset Information

Avian metapneumovirus: A five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR method for identification of subgroups A, B, C, and D.

ABSTRACT: End-point and real-time avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) RT-PCRs have been developed to detect one or two of the four recognized subgroups (A,B,C, and D) simultaneously or for broad range AMPV detection. Current subgroup specific tests target variable areas of the genome which makes these PCRs sensitive to specificity defects as recently documented. In the current study, a single five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR targeting the conserved viral polymerase gene of AMPV, which is less prone to genetic drift, has been designed. This digital droplet RT-PCR was capable of identifying each of the four AMPV subgroups. Each subgroup was identified according to a specifically assigned fluorescent amplitude. Specificity, which was tested including 31 AMPV strains, non-AMPV avian viruses and closely related human respiratory viruses, was 100%. The specific limit of detection for extracted viral RNA was estimated between 1 and 3 copies/μl. This tool simplifies the number of tests required for AMPV genotype diagnostics and should be theoretically less effected by viral genome evolution due to its target region. Ultimately, application of this test will contribute to an improved understanding of the global geographic distribution and subgroup host range of field strains.

SUBMITTER: Lemaitre E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9705331 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Avian metapneumovirus: A five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR method for identification of subgroups A, B, C, and D.

Lemaitre Evelyne E Bougeard Stéphanie S Allée Chantal C Eterradossi Nicolas N Courtillon Céline C Brown Paul Alun PA

Frontiers in veterinary science 20221115

End-point and real-time avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) RT-PCRs have been developed to detect one or two of the four recognized subgroups (A,B,C, and D) simultaneously or for broad range AMPV detection. Current subgroup specific tests target variable areas of the genome which makes these PCRs sensitive to specificity defects as recently documented. In the current study, a single five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR targeting the conserved viral polymerase gene of AMPV, which is less prone to genetic dr ...[more]

PMID: 36458056

Similar Datasets

Project description:Most individuals acutely infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exhibit mild symptoms. However, 10 to 20% of those infected develop long-term symptoms, referred to as post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition (PCC). One hypothesis is that PCC might be exacerbated by viral persistence in tissue sanctuaries. Therefore, the accurate detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 are not only necessary for viral load monitoring but also crucial for detecting long-term viral persistence and determining whether viral replication is occurring in tissue reservoirs. In this study, the sensitivity and robustness of reverse transcription (RT)-droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and RT-quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques have been compared for the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 genomic and subgenomic RNAs from oropharyngeal swabs taken from confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive, SARS-CoV-2-exposed, and nonexposed individuals as well as from samples from mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. Our data demonstrated that both techniques presented equivalent results in the mid- and high-viral-load ranges. Additionally, RT-ddPCR was more sensitive than RT-qPCR in the low-viral-load range, allowing the accurate detection of positive results in individuals exposed to the virus. Overall, these data suggest that RT-ddPCR might be an alternative to RT-qPCR for detecting low viral loads in samples and for assessing viral persistence in samples from individuals with PCC. IMPORTANCE We developed one-step reverse transcription (RT)-droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) protocols to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and compared them to the gold-standard RT-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method. RT-ddPCR was more sensitive than RT-qPCR in the low-viral-load range, while both techniques were equivalent in the mid- and high-viral-load ranges. Overall, these results suggest that RT-ddPCR might be a viable alternative to RT-qPCR when it comes to detecting low viral loads in samples, which is a highly relevant issue for determining viral persistence in as-yet-unknown tissue reservoirs in individuals suffering from post-COVID conditions or long COVID.

Project description:The authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in the EU is subject to the provision of evidence of safety and of the availability of reliable analytical methods. These methods represent an essential tool for official laboratories to enforce a harmonised market control. Here the validation of droplet digital PCR (dPCR) methods has been performed for studying if the performance and acceptance parameters set by EU and other international guidelines for the analysis of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food and feed are suitable and achievable also with such methods. The single-laboratory validation study showed that performance requirements set for GMO analysis by real time PCR can also be used to assess dPCR-based methods. Moreover, trueness and precision were assessed for both simplex and duplex formats in a multi-laboratory validation study organised according to international standards. Overall, the data on trueness, repeatability and reproducibility precision resulting from the collaborative study are satisfying the acceptance criteria for the respective parameters as stipulated in the EU and other international guidance such as the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (CCMAS). For instance, the duplex droplet dPCR method for MON810 showed relative repeatability standard deviations from 1.8% to 15.7%, while the relative reproducibility standard deviation was found to be between 2.1% and 16.5% over the dynamic range studied. Moreover, the relative bias of the dPCR methods was well below 25% across the entire dynamic range. In addition, other aspects supporting the application of digital PCR for the control of GMOs on the market were experimentally assessed such as the conversion of the measurement results from copy number ratio to mass fraction, the influence of the DNA extraction step and of the ingredient content. It was found that the DNA extraction step added only a limited contribution to the variability of the measurement results under the studied conditions. The decreasing amount of the target ingredient content may decrease the level of precision of the method, although within the acceptance range of GMO performance parameters.

Dataset Information

Avian metapneumovirus: A five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR method for identification of subgroups A, B, C, and D.

Publications

Avian metapneumovirus: A five-plex digital droplet RT-PCR method for identification of subgroups A, B, C, and D.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets