Dataset Information

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting.

Methods

Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively included in this study.

Results

Among the 203 patients included, 90 (44%) received UST, 42 (21%) received VDZ and 71 (35%) received a second anti-TNF agent. The first anti-TNF agent was discontinued due to a primary nonresponse in 42 (21%) patients. At weeks 14-24, the rates of steroid-free remission were similar between the UST, VDZ and second anti-TNF groups (29%, 38% and 44%, respectively, p = 0.15). With a mean follow-up of 118 weeks, drug survival was shorter for patients who received ustekinumab treatment (p = 0.001). In the case of trough level less than 5 µg/ml, patients treated with a second anti-TNF agent had a higher postinduction remission rate (p = 0.002), and drug survival (p = 0.0005). No other relevant factors were associated with treatment efficacy, including trough levels greater than 5 µg/ml.

Conclusions

VDZ, UST and a second anti-TNF agent exhibit similar efficacy in the short term, as second-biological line treatment in patients with CD who are refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, but shorter drug maintenance is observed for patients treated with UST.

SUBMITTER: Rayer C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9717550 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

Rayer Cassandra C Nachury Maria M Bourreille Arnaud A Roblin Xavier X Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent L Viennot Stephanie S Flamant Mathurin M Laharie David D Caron Bénédicte B Dewitte Marie M Siproudhis Laurent L Fumery Mathurin M Bouguen Guillaume G

BMC gastroenterology 20221201 1

<h4>Background</h4>No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospe ...[more]

PMID: 36457080

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUstekinumab and vedolizumab are both effective for treating Crohn's disease (CD). However, no head-to-head trials have been conducted thus far. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in CD patients either naïve or exposed to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi).MethodsPatients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab for luminal CD were included from six centers in China from May 2020 to July 2023. Steroid-free remission, clinical remission, objective response, and remission at Weeks 26 and 52 were evaluated in a retrospective multicenter propensity score-weighted cohort.FindingsA total of 536 patients were included (386 ustekinumab, and 150 vedolizumab). After adjustment, ustekinumab showed higher rates of clinical remission (56.4% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.005), steroid-free remission (55.4% vs. 46.1%, P = 0.003), and objective response (67.8% vs. 42.7%, P < 0.001) than vedolizumab at Week 26. At Week 52, ustekinumab exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical remission (65.8% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001), steroid-free remission (65.8% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001), objective response (66.7% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001), and objective remission (31.4% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that ustekinumab had higher rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, and objective response at Weeks 26 and 52, and objective remission at Week 52 in TNFi-exposed patients, while ustekinumab showed higher rates of objective response at Weeks 26 and 52 and clinical remission, steroid-free remission and objective remission at Week 52 in TNFi-naïve patients. Adverse event rates were similar between the groups (4.9% ustekinumab vs. 6.7% vedolizumab, P = 0.423).InterpretationUstekinumab showed superior clinical and objective outcomes compared to vedolizumab, with comparable safety outcomes. The therapeutic superiority was observed in both short-term and long-term phases in TNFi-exposed patients, and the long-term phase in TNFi-naïve patients.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Key Research Projects of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, the program of Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, and National Key Clinical Discipline.

Project description:Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative, as postoperative recurrence (POR) after ileocolonic resection is the rule in the absence of prophylactic treatment. In the present article, we critically review available data on the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and new biologics (including vedolizumab and ustekinumab) in the prevention and treatment of POR after surgery in CD. Several studies (summarised in various meta-analyses) have confirmed the efficacy of anti-TNFs in the prevention of POR. We identified 37 studies, including 1863 CD patients, with mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 29%. Only few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared thiopurines and anti-TNFs, with controversial results, although the superiority of the latter is supported by several meta-analyses. Infliximab and adalimumab seem equally effective. The combination of anti-TNFs and immunosuppressives should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNFs. Several studies have shown that anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. In fact, the use of the same anti-TNF before and after surgery might be effective for the prevention of POR. Prophylactic anti-TNF treatment, once started, should be continued long term. Anti-TNFs are also effective for the treatment of established POR. Retreatment with anti-TNFs for POR is a valid strategy even after their preoperative failure. In six studies (including 156 patients) evaluating vedolizumab, mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months was 41%. The non-randomised comparison of anti-TNFs and vedolizumab has provided controversial results. One placebo-controlled RCT confirmed that vedolizumab is quite effective in preventing POR in CD patients with increased risk of recurrence. Seven studies (including 162 patients) evaluated ustekinumab, with a mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 41%. The comparative efficacy of ustekinumab and anti-TNFs is still unclear. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab seem to be equally effective, although the experience is very limited. In conclusion, to date, anti-TNFs are the most effective agents in preventing and treating POR in CD. Anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. Vedolizumab seems to be quite effective in the prevention of POR in patients with increased risk of recurrence. Ustekinumab is probably also effective in the postoperative setting, although the comparative efficacy with anti-TNFs or vedolizumab is still unclear.

Project description:BackgroundDespite advancements in the therapeutic armamentarium for Crohn's disease (CD), biologic and small molecule monotherapies are associated with sub-optimal response and remission rates. Utilizing dual biologic therapy (DBT) holds the potential to increase efficacy in the treatment of refractory or partially responsive CD. Evidence pertaining to this strategy remains limited.MethodsWe retrospectively examined refractory CD patients treated with a combination of ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Outcomes to DBT at week (wk) 52 were compared to monotherapy. The primary outcome constituted corticosteroid-free remission. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, infections, hospitalizations, surgeries, treatment persistence, and disease clearance.ResultsSixteen of 21 active refractory CD patients (76%) on DBT achieved disease remission at wk 52. Mucosal healing was observed in 38% (n = 6), biochemical remission in 25% (n = 4), and both clinical and biochemical remission in 38% (n = 6). Of these patients, 50% (n = 8) achieved corticosteroid-free remission. Three patients (37.5%) with corticosteroid-free remission achieved complete disease clearance. Paired median fecal calprotectin decreased from 508 to 118 µg/g (P < .0001). Paired C-reactive protein median decreased from 1.04 to 0.50 mg/dL (P < .0001). Median Harvey Bradshaw Index score reduced from 7 to 2 (P = .003). Endoscopic healing was achieved with a paired simple endoscopic score for CD decrease from 6 to 3 (P = .013). Corticosteroid dependency reduced from 17 to 8 patients discontinuing altogether. Patients still requiring corticosteroids experienced a decrease in average daily dose from 9 to 6 mg (P = .045). At wk 52, 5 patients (24%) did not meet the criteria for remission with 4 requiring CD-related surgical intervention. Mean CD-related hospitalizations reduced from 2.95 ± 2.33 to 0.52 ± 1.12 (P < .001) and surgeries from 1.76 ± 1.3 to 0.14 ± 0.4 (P < .001). Three infections with 1 requiring hospitalization and 1 report of headache were noted. Two patients discontinued DBT.ConclusionsDual biologic therapy with ustekinumab and vedolizumab is a safe and effective strategy to induce disease remission in refractory CD. Large-scale studies are necessary to validate findings in a prospective setting.

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD). However, more data are necessary on the effectiveness of ustekinumab in bio-naïve patients in real-life studies.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to conventional therapy and without previous exposure to biological drugs.DesignWe performed a nationwide, observational, retrospective, multicentre study including patients with CD, in which ustekinumab was used as the first biological drug.MethodsThe corticosteroid-free clinical and biological response and remission were analysed at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw index ⩽ 4 and biological remission as a faecal calprotectin (FC) <250 mg/g and C-reactive protein (CRP) <5 mg/L. Moreover, the persistence of the treatment and any adverse events were assessed.ResultsIn all, 84 patients were included in the study, males and females were equally distributed, with a median age of 63 years [interquartile range (IQR): 51-75] and a median disease duration of 6.8 years [IQR: 3.6-17.0]. The majority (86.9%) of patients were treated with ustekinumab as monotherapy, without concomitant immunosuppressive medication. The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission or response at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72 was 93.3% (56/60), 86.8% (46/53), 82.2% (37/45) and 71.4% (30/42), respectively. CRP returned to normal values in 47.6%, 43.2%, 50% and 52.4% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. Similarly, FC was normalized in 45.5%, 45.5%, 48.6% and 50% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. The cumulative probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment was 84.8% (95% confidence interval: 73.3-91.6) after 72 weeks. Ustekinumab was discontinued in 10 patients (11.9%) within 72 weeks of follow-up. Reasons for discontinuing treatment were lack of response (n = 4), adverse events (n = 4) and death (n = 2). There were no discontinuations because of stable remission.ConclusionsUstekinumab was effective and safe in Spanish bio-naïve CD patients, showing a quicker and more durable response than obtained in patients with previous biological treatment. In this cohort of bio-naïve patients starting on ustekinumab, the average age was high.Plain language summaryEffectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease patients not previously exposed to other biological therapies Evidence on the use of ustekinumab in biological naïve real-world patients is scarce. Here, we present real-world data evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in 84 bio-naïve patients from 17 Spanish hospitals. We report high rates of both clinical and biological remission. Moreover, after 1 year, 90.4% of patients remained being treated with ustekinumab. The safety profile of ustekinumab in these patient population was favourable. In conclusion, our results show that in patients with CD, ustekinumab could be considered as first-line therapy.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets