Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a tool for physiological lesion assessment based on invasive coronary angiography.Aims
We aimed to assess the reproducibility of QFR computed from the same angiograms as assessed by multiple observers from different, international sites.Methods
We included 50 patients previously enrolled in dedicated QFR studies. QFR was computed twice, one month apart by five blinded observers. The main analysis was the coefficient of variation (CV) as a measure of intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Key secondary analysis was the identification of clinical and procedural characteristics predicting reproducibility.Results
The intra-observer CV ranged from 2.3% (1.5-2.8) to 10.2% (6.6-12.0) among the observers. The inter-observer CV was 9.4% (8.0-10.5). The QFR observer, low angiographic quality, and low fractional flow reserve (FFR) were independent predictors of a large absolute difference between repeated QFR measurements defined as a difference larger than the median difference (>0.03).Conclusions
The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for QFR computed from the same angiograms ranged from high to poor among multiple observers from different sites with an average agreement of 0.01±0.08 for repeated measurements. The reproducibility was dependent on the observer, angiographic quality and the coronary artery stenosis severity as assessed by FFR.
SUBMITTER: Westra J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9724855 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 20220201 15
<h4>Background</h4>Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a tool for physiological lesion assessment based on invasive coronary angiography.<h4>Aims</h4>We aimed to assess the reproducibility of QFR computed from the same angiograms as assessed by multiple observers from different, international sites.<h4>Methods</h4>We included 50 patients previously enrolled in dedicated QFR studies. QFR was computed twice, one month apart by five blinded observers. The main analysis was the coefficient of variation ...[more]