Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A comparison of clinical development pathways to advance tuberculosis regimen development.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Current tuberculosis (TB) regimen development pathways are slow and in urgent need of innovation. We investigated novel phase IIc and seamless phase II/III trials utilizing multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization trial designs to select promising combination regimens in a platform adaptive trial.

Methods

Clinical trial simulation tools were built using predictive and validated parametric survival models of time to culture conversion (intermediate endpoint) and time to TB-related unfavorable outcome (final endpoint). This integrative clinical trial simulation tool was used to explore and optimize design parameters for aforementioned trial designs.

Results

Both multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization designs were able to reliably graduate desirable regimens in ≥ 95% of trial simulations and reliably stop suboptimal regimens in ≥ 90% of trial simulations. Overall, adaptive phase IIc designs reduced patient enrollment by 17% and 25% with multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization designs respectively compared to the conventional sequential approach, while seamless designs reduced study duration by 2.6 and 3.5 years respectively (typically ≥ 8.5 years for standard sequential approach).

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrate that adaptive trial designs are suitable for TB regimen development, and we provide plausible design parameters for a platform adaptive trial. Ultimately trial design and specification of design parameters will depend on clinical trial objectives. To support decision-making for clinical trial designs in contemporary TB regimen development, we provide a flexible clinical trial simulation tool that can be used to explore and optimize design features and parameters.

SUBMITTER: Chang V 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9733404 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A comparison of clinical development pathways to advance tuberculosis regimen development.

Chang V V   Phillips P P J PPJ   Imperial M Z MZ   Nahid P P   Savic R M RM  

BMC infectious diseases 20221209 1


<h4>Background</h4>Current tuberculosis (TB) regimen development pathways are slow and in urgent need of innovation. We investigated novel phase IIc and seamless phase II/III trials utilizing multi-arm multi-stage and Bayesian response adaptive randomization trial designs to select promising combination regimens in a platform adaptive trial.<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical trial simulation tools were built using predictive and validated parametric survival models of time to culture conversion (intermedi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9488660 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5802537 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7790895 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6851285 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8592517 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5995964 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6822991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3719725 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4462572 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9731747 | biostudies-literature