Subcostal robotic-assisted pulmonary resection: Left lingular segmentectomy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Vishnu R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9735356 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Subcostal robotic-assisted pulmonary resection: Left lingular segmentectomy.
Vishnu Rajkamal R Jung Woohyun W Chia-Hui Shih Beatrice B Hwang Yoohwa Y Jeon Jae Hyun JH Cho Sukki S Kim Kwhanmien K Jheon Sanghoon S
JTCVS techniques 20220906
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8350876 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8575848 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9737036 | biostudies-literature
Project description:When tumor is located in the superior segment of the lower lobe (S6) close to the intersegmental plane with the posterior basal segment (S10), bisegmentectomy of S6 and S10 is oncologically feasible and reasonable to preserve lung parenchyma. However, this bisegmentectomy is technically challenging because of the complex anatomy of S10. Herein, we report a successful case of left S6+S10 segmentectomy by a robotic approach with sufficient surgical margin. A robotic approach is suitable for such a complex segmentectomy of the lower lobe because of the good looking-up high-definition 3-dimensional view.
| S-EPMC11910831 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRobotic anatomic segmentectomy (RATS) for early-stage lung cancer is being increasingly performed in spite of limited published evidence. To evaluate its safety and oncologic efficacy, we compared the outcomes of both RATS and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) segmentectomy in patients with small-sized (<2 cm) peripheral stage IA lung cancer.MethodsFrom November 2011 to January 2018, a total of 130 patients with resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent RATS (n=50) and VATS (n=80) pulmonary segmentectomy were included. Clinicopathologic data, recurrence rate, and survival were recorded.ResultsThe demographics, pulmonary function, comorbidity, and tumor size were similar between RATS segmentectomy and VATS segmentectomy. The surgery time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and blood loss were reduced in the RATS group compared to the VATS group. The number of totally dissected lymph nodes and postoperative complications were similar between the 2 groups. There was no operative mortality. The intensity of narcotic use during hospital stay and the time to return to routine daily activities were also reduced in the RATS group. There was no recurrence observed in the RATS group during the median 38-month follow-up period; meanwhile, during a median 85-month follow-up period in the VATS group, local recurrence and distant recurrence was observed in 2 patients (2.5%) and 3 patients (3.75%) respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year recurrence-free survival between the RATS and VATS groups (100% vs. 93.75%; P>0.05).ConclusionsRATS can be performed safely and effectively in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The reduced narcotic use and earlier return to routine daily activities of RATS patients might reflect its less traumatic nature as compared to VATS. For stage IA disease with small tumors (<2 cm), segmentectomy performed by RATS has better oncologic efficacy when compared to VATS, although in this study, this difference did not reach statistical difference.
| S-EPMC7225141 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposesRobot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) segmentectomy is becoming increasingly common because of the expanded indications for segmentectomy and the widespread adoption of robotic surgery. The precise division of the intersegmental plane is necessary to ensure oncologic margins from the tumor and to preserve the lung function. In this study, we present a strategy for accurately dividing the intersegmental plane using a robotic stapler and review the surgical outcomes.MethodsRATS portal segmentectomy was performed using the Da Vinci Xi system and the intersegmental plane was dissected using a robotic stapler. We evaluated the perioperative outcomes in 92 patients who underwent RATS portal segmentectomy between May 2020 and January 2023. These results were compared with those of 82 patients who underwent complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (CVATS) during the same period.ResultsThe operative and console times were 162 and 97 min, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complications were observed in four cases (4.3%). The operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and maximum incision size were significantly lower in the RATS group than in the CVATS group. However, RATS requires a significantly higher number of staplers than CVATS.ConclusionsThe division of the intersegmental plane using a robotic stapler in RATS portal segmentectomy was, therefore, found to be safe and effective.
| S-EPMC11499527 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere has been increasing adoption of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (uVATS) for lung resection. We undertook a single-institution retrospective study, comparing these approaches.MethodsAn analysis was performed of patients who underwent lung resection by either uVATS or RATS. Operations were performed between July 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021. Two surgeons [one experienced in RATS, the other experienced in multi-portal VATS (mVATS), with the recent adoption of uVATS] performed all operations. Patients with known or suspected lung cancer or metastases were included. In addition to baseline characteristics, adverse events [as defined in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Database], subjective pain scores (scale 1-10), and morphine equivalent dose (MED) requirement were compared for patients who remained in the hospital on post-operative days (POD) 1 to 4. For patients with lung cancer, recurrence rates, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were evaluated.ResultsThere were 128 (50 uVATS and 78 RATS) patients. Although uVATS patients were older (70 versus 65 years; P=0.01), there was no difference in baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)%, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)%, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Mean procedure times and adverse event rates were similar. Four major complications occurred (all unanticipated return to the operating room). The 30- and 90-day mortality was zero. RATS was associated with shorter hospital stay (2.6 versus 4 days; P=0.02) and improved lymph node (15.3 versus 9.9; P=0.003) dissection. MED requirement was significantly reduced on POD 2-4 after uVATS, on both univariate and multivariate analysis. Ninety-four patients (uVATS; n=38, RATS; n=56) had primary lung cancer. Median follow-up was 15.6 months for these patients. Recurrence occurred in 4/34 (11.8%) uVATS and 7/56 (12.5%) RATS patients (P=0.77). There were no differences in overall survival or time to recurrence.ConclusionsUVATS and RATS lung resections were associated with similar post-operative adverse event rates. Lymph node dissection and length of stay were improved with RATS. Oncological outcomes were similar. UVATS was associated with lower morphine requirement. Prospective studies will help further clarify the differences between these approaches.
| S-EPMC11635240 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Lung segmentectomy is increasingly used to resect lung nodules. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is widely chosen to performing lung segmentectomy, while robotic assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) was also one useful and practical method. There article was intended to compared the short-time outcomes of RATS and VATS in lung segmentectomy. METHODS:The patients with lung nodules underwent segmentectomy by either RATS or VATS from January 2016 to April 2017 were studied. Baseline characteristics and short-time outcomes (dissected lymph nodes, postoperative duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of pro-longed air leak, atrial fibrillation and pneumonia) were compared. RESULTS:166 patients were included in this study: 81 patients underwent RATS segmentectomy while 85 underwent VATS segmentectomy. The number of lymph nodes dissected in RATS group was more than in VATS group ?(13.07±5.08) vs (10.81±5.74), P=0.010?. The incidence of some postoperative complications such as pro-longed air leak, atrial fibrillation was not significant different between the two approaches. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with VATS, RATS has similar safety and operability, and the number of lymphadenectomy is significantly more than that of VATS.
| S-EPMC6935034 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe treatment strategy of multiple pulmonary nodules presents significant challenges in thoracic surgery, particularly regarding precise diagnosis and treatment. The integration of emerging technologies for concurrent hybrid diagnostic and therapeutic approaches represents a potential breakthrough. The purpose of this study is to provide a new paradigm for the synchronous mixed treatment of multiple pulmonary nodules.Case descriptionA 34-year-old female patient was initially diagnosed with multiple pulmonary nodules in August 2023 and has been undergoing regular follow-up since then. A computed tomography (CT) in September 2024 showed a mixed ground-glass nodule (mGGN) in the dorsal segment (S6) of the left lower lobe of the lung, measuring approximately 11 mm × 7 mm, indicating a high risk of malignancy; and a ground-glass opacity (GGO) measuring 5 mm × 4 mm between the dorsal segment and anterior basal segment (S6 and S8) of the right lower lobe, with both nodules showing enlargement compared to a year ago. A simultaneous bilateral lung surgery is planned. The Ion robotic system was utilized to navigate precisely to the lesion along the B6b bronchus of the right lower lobe, where the lung nodule was ablated with a laser. Subsequently, the Da Vinci robotic system used to assist in the precise resection of the S6. Pathology on the left showed adenocarcinoma; a CT one week postoperatively showed a 1 cm patchy shadow with a cavity on the right.ConclusionsThis report presents the first surgical technique for ion robotic-assisted laser ablation and dual-robot collaborative surgery, offering a novel strategy for the integration of airway diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.
| S-EPMC11921196 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare condition resulting from the compression of the brachial plexus and/or the subclavian vessels in the thoracic outlet (TO). Neurogenic TOS (NTOS) is the most common form in up to 95% of the cases, while venous TOS (VTOS) occurs in 3-5% and arterial TOS (ATOS) in 1-2% of the cases. Patients may suffer from the pathologic coexistence of arterio-venous compression in the TO called arterio-venous TOS (AVTOS) with an overlap of clinical symptoms. While imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT)-angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-angiography and duplex sonography are helpful to detect the underlying condition in vascular pathologies, electrodiagnostic testing is necessary to distinguish NTOS from other peripheral neuropathies. Subclavian vein (SV)-compression in the TO can result in venous thrombosis, called Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS), named after the discoverers of the disease. Besides oral anticoagulation in cases with venous upper extremity thrombosis and multimodal conservative treatment in the management of NTOS, surgical decompression is the current standard of care for TOS. Surgical decompression aims to remove structures compressing the brachial plexus or the subclavian vasculature in the TO. In NTOS, when conservative management has failed, surgical resection of the 1st or a cervical rib is often combined with scalenectomy and brachial plexus neurolysis. Minimally invasive techniques have replaced traditionally open supra-, infraclavicular or transaxillary approaches with excellent results and minimal morbidity. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was described to offer better visualization, shorter length of stay (LOS) and less neurovascular injuries attributable to less traction applied. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) moreover, further improved magnification, angulation of the surgical instruments in narrow anatomical spaces and the comfort for the operating surgeon. Uniportal RATS (uRATS) has lately been applied for 1st rib resection. The aim of this surgical technique manual is to describe and illustrate a RATS 1st rib resection with its advantages over traditionally open approaches step by step.
| S-EPMC11565304 | biostudies-literature