Dataset Information

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and reasons for hesitancy among Canadian pregnant people: a prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed and approved at an unparalleled speed. Given that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are recommended to pregnant people, our aim was to quantify vaccination uptake, and describe vaccination hesitancy and behavioural attitudes surrounding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy in Canada.

Methods

The CONCEPTION study is an ongoing international study started in June 2020, evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health of pregnant people and their children. For this study, pregnant people recruited from Apr. 20, 2021, to Feb. 8, 2022, and residing in Canada were invited to complete a Web-based survey. In addition to all CONCEPTION variables, data on vaccine uptake as well as personal knowledge of COVID-19 severity in pregnancy and of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety and efficacy were collected. Marginal risk differences and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess determinants of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy.

Results

From Apr. 20, 2021, to Feb. 8, 2022, 603 pregnant people were recruited and gave consent, of which 83.7% (n = 505) were vaccinated and 16.3% (n = 98) were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Uptake of the influenza vaccine in 2020/21 was a significant predictor of being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 or intention to be vaccinated (marginal risk difference 3.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0% to 3.3%, adjusted OR 4.43, 95% CI 2.32 to 9.25), and being employed (marginal risk difference 11.2%, 95% CI 10.6% to 11.9%, adjusted OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.35) increased the likelihood of being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Self-assessed knowledge of COVID-19 severity and vaccine efficacy was not associated with vaccine uptake.

Interpretation

Among the Canadian pregnant people who responded to this study, vaccine uptake against SARS-CoV-2 was high. However, our results underscore the importance of improving knowledge transfer about the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnancy to guide vaccination efforts.

SUBMITTER: Gorgui J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9744265 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and reasons for hesitancy among Canadian pregnant people: a prospective cohort study.

Gorgui Jessica J Atallah Anthony A Boucoiran Isabelle I Gomez Yessica-Haydee YH Bérard Anick A

CMAJ open 20221001 4

<h4>Background</h4>Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed and approved at an unparalleled speed. Given that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are recommended to pregnant people, our aim was to quantify vaccination uptake, and describe vaccination hesitancy and behavioural attitudes surrounding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy in Canada.<h4>Methods</h4>The CONCEPTION study is an ongoing international study started in June 2020, evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health of ...[more]

PMID: 36735245

Similar Datasets

Project description:The successive emergence of SARS-CoV-2 mutations has led to an unprecedented increase in COVID-19 incidence worldwide. Currently, vaccination is considered to be the best available solution to control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, public opposition to vaccination persists in many countries, which can lead to increased COVID-19 caseloads and hence greater opportunities for vaccine-evasive mutant strains to arise. To determine the extent that public opinion regarding vaccination can induce or hamper the emergence of new variants, we develop a model that couples a compartmental disease transmission framework featuring two strains of SARS-CoV-2 with game theoretical dynamics on whether or not to vaccinate. We combine semi-stochastic and deterministic simulations to explore the effect of mutation probability, perceived cost of receiving vaccines, and perceived risks of infection on the emergence and spread of mutant SARS-CoV-2 strains. We find that decreasing the perceived costs of being vaccinated and increasing the perceived risks of infection (that is, decreasing vaccine hesitation) will decrease the possibility of vaccine-resistant mutant strains becoming established by about fourfold for intermediate mutation rates. Conversely, we find increasing vaccine hesitation to cause both higher probability of mutant strains emerging and more wild-type cases after the mutant strain has appeared. We also find that once a new variant has emerged, perceived risk of being infected by the original variant plays a much larger role than perceptions of the new variant in determining future outbreak characteristics. Furthermore, we find that rapid vaccination under non-pharmaceutical interventions is a highly effective strategy for preventing new variant emergence, due to interaction effects between non-pharmaceutical interventions and public support for vaccination. Our findings indicate that policies that combine combating vaccine-related misinformation with non-pharmaceutical interventions (such as reducing social contact) will be the most effective for avoiding the establishment of harmful new variants.

Project description:BackgroundMany countries and organizations recommended people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, vaccine hesitancy still exists and becomes a barrier for promoting COVID-19 vaccination among PLWHA.ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate factors that contributed to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWHA.MethodsThe study used a multicenter cross-sectional design and an online survey mode. We recruited PLWHA aged 18-65 years from 5 metropolitan cities in China between January 2021 and February 2021. Participants completed an online survey through Golden Data, a widely used encrypted web-based survey platform. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the background characteristics in relation to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and structural equation modeling was performed to assess the relationships among perceived benefits, perceived risks, self-efficacy, subjective norms, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.ResultsAmong 1735 participants, 41.61% (722/1735) reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Older age, no other vaccinations in the past 3 years, and having chronic disease history were positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Structural equation modeling revealed a direct relationship of perceived benefits, perceived risks, and subjective norms with self-efficacy and vaccine hesitancy and an indirect relationship of perceived benefits, perceived risks, and subjective norms with vaccine hesitancy. Moreover, self-efficacy toward COVID-19 vaccination was low. PLWHA had concerns of HIV disclosure during COVID-19 vaccination. Family member support could have an impact on COVID-19 vaccination decision-making.ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was high among PLWHA in China. To reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, programs and strategies should be adopted to eliminate the concerns for COVID-19 vaccination, disseminate accurate information on the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, encourage family member support for COVID-19 vaccination, and improve PLWHA's trust of medical professionals.

Project description:ImportanceTwo interventions to prevent severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants were approved in 2023-a bivalent prenatal RSV prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine and an infant monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab). Understanding their uptake and clinical outcomes is essential for public health planning.ObjectiveTo describe uptake of the prenatal RSVpreF vaccine and infant nirsevimab.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic center among 647 pregnant individuals eligible for RSVpreF vaccination (32-36 weeks' gestation between October 15, 2023, and January 31, 2024) and infants eligible for nirsevimab (no prenatal RSVpreF vaccination >14 days before delivery).ExposurePregnancy or birth during the 2023-2024 RSV season.Main outcomes and measuresRSVpreF vaccination among eligible pregnant individuals and nirsevimab administration prior to hospital discharge among eligible infants.ResultsOf 647 eligible pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [6.2] years; 355 nulliparous [54.9%]; 558 privately insured [86.2%]), 414 (64.0%) received the RSVpreF vaccine. Factors associated with higher RSVpreF uptake included older birthing parent age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12), nulliparity (AOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.31-2.60), private insurance (AOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.27-3.80), non-Hispanic ethnicity (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI 1.57-3.55; reference: Hispanic), receipt of any COVID-19 vaccine (AOR, 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-13.70), 2023-2024 formula COVID-19 booster vaccine (AOR, 5.62; 95% CI, 3.80-8.48), influenza vaccine (AOR, 8.14; 95% CI, 5.38-12.50), or tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine (AOR, 6.86; 95% CI, 3.79-13.10). Factors associated with lower RSVpreF uptake included non-English language preference (AOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.52), Black race (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; reference: Asian), other or unknown race (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76), and multiple gestation (AOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-0.88). Nirsevimab was administered to 183 of 261 eligible infants (70.1%) prior to hospital discharge. Among those who did not receive RSVpreF or standard prenatal vaccines, 40.4% of their neonates (19 of 47) received nirsevimab; among those who declined infant hepatitis B vaccination, 34.0% of their neonates (17 of 50) received nirsevimab. Respiratory syncytial virus coverage exceeded 80% during all months of the study period except October 2023, the first month during which prenatal RSV vaccination and infant nirsevimab were available. Preterm delivery occurred in 35 of 414 RSVpreF-vaccinated individuals (8.5%) and 43 of 233 unvaccinated individuals (18.5%). In a nested case-control analysis with preterm birth as the outcome, there was no significant association between RSVpreF vaccination and preterm birth (AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.55-1.93).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, uptake of the RSVpreF vaccine and infant nirsevimab was high. Nirsevimab uptake was high even among individuals who did not receive routine prenatal or infant vaccines. There was no significant association between RSVpreF vaccination and preterm birth. This study suggests that an RSV prevention strategy that included both prenatal vaccination and infant monoclonal antibody administration had high uptake and reassuring perinatal outcomes.

Dataset Information

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and reasons for hesitancy among Canadian pregnant people: a prospective cohort study.

Background

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Publications

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and reasons for hesitancy among Canadian pregnant people: a prospective cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets