High volume transplant experience is beneficial but not mandatory for the performance of complex liver resections.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ayabe R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9745605 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
High volume transplant experience is beneficial but not mandatory for the performance of complex liver resections.
Ayabe Reed R Vauthey Jean-Nicolas JN Tran Cao Hop S HS
Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition 20221201 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionMajor hepatectomies are utilized to manage primary hepatic malignancies. Reports from high-volume centers (HVCs) with minimal perioperative mortality focus on multiple aspects of perioperative care, although patient-specific factors remain unelucidated. We identified patient factors associated with outcomes and examined whether these contribute to survival differences.MethodsWe queried the National Cancer Database (2006-2015) for patients with primary liver malignancies managed with major hepatectomy. Facilities were dichotomized by volume (high volume: >15 hepatectomies/year). Perioperative outcomes were compared based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics as well as center volume.Results4263 patients were included with 78.5% receiving care in low-volume centers (LVCs). 90-day postoperative mortality was higher in LVCs vs. HVCs (12% vs. 7.5%; P < .001). Factors associated with undergoing surgery in LVCs included: living in areas with lower income (P = .006) and education (P < .001), having nonprivate insurance (P < .001), residing near the care center (P < .001), and having a comorbidity score (CDS) >1 (P = .014). Patients with CDS ≤ 1 had higher 90-day mortality in LVCs (11.3% vs. 6.6%; P < .001) and had similar outcomes in LVCs and HVCs (15.6% vs. 13.7% P = .6). Patients with CDS > 1 were more likely to receive care in LVCs (16.3% vs. 12.7%; P < .001).ConclusionReduced perioperative mortality following major hepatectomy in HVCs is driven by optimal management of patients with low CDS. However, nearly 1 in 5 patients who undergo major hepatectomies have a high CDS and approximately 15% of them succumb in the perioperative period irrespective of the treating centers' experience.
| S-EPMC9927630 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAblation is an effective, parenchymal-sparing treatment for primary liver cancer and liver metastases. The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience with laparoscopic microwave ablation regarding postoperative complications, rate of conversions to open procedure, and technical efficacy.MethodsThis was a quality improvement project carried out at a tertiary care center in Denmark. Patients ≥ 18 years old with liver malignancies, not available for percutaneous ablation, and treated with ultrasound-guided laparoscopic ablation were included.ResultsFrom March 2023 to December 2023, 39 patients were referred for laparoscopic ablation after a multidisciplinary team conference. Of these, two procedures were converted to open procedures due to adhesion and tumor progression. Three patients rejected the sharing of medical information, two procedures were canceled and in one case the strategy was changed perioperatively. Therefore, 32 procedures in 31 patients were available for analysis. Complete ablation was evaluated after 1 month and was achieved in 100% of the procedures. None of the patients died, and no complications were reported in 21 cases (65.6%). Most patients with complications had a grade 1 complication based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, which among others included abdominal and shoulder pain, atrial fibrillation, and subcutaneous hematoma. Two patients had a complication grade 2 (wound infection and decompensated cirrhosis) and one had a grade 4b (sepsis due to pneumonia and urinary tract infection). The median Comprehensive Complication Index was 12.2 (interquartile range 8.7-24.2). Furthermore, univariable logistic regression showed that ≥ 2 tumors treated were associated with a higher risk of complications (odds ratio 6.37, 95% confidence interval [1.20;33.85], p-value = 0.0297).ConclusionUltrasound-guided laparoscopic microwave ablation of liver malignancies is feasible and safe with little risk for complications, a high technical efficacy, and a low rate of conversions to open procedures.
| S-EPMC11458709 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo report a single-centre experience with the novel Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique and systematically review the related literature.MethodsSince January 2013, patients with extended primary or secondary liver tumors whose future liver remnant (FLR) was considered too small to allow hepatic resection were prospectively assessed for the ALPPS procedure. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central.ResultsUntil July 2014 ALPPS was completed in 9 patients whose mean age was 60 ± 8 years. Indications for surgical resection were metastases from colorectal cancer in 3 cases, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in 3 cases, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in 2 cases and hepatocellular carcinoma without chronic liver disease in 1 case. The calculated FLR volume was 289 ± 122 mL (21.1 ± 5.5%) before ALPPS-1 and 528 ± 121 mL (32.2 ± 5.7%) before ALLPS-2 (p < 0.001). The increase in FLR between the two procedures was 96 ± 47% (range: 24-160%, p < 0.001). Additional interventions were performed in 4 cases: 3 patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, and one case underwent wedge resection of a residual tumor in the FLR. The average time between the first and second step of the procedure was 10.8 ± 2.9 days. The average hospital stay was 24.1 ± 13.3 days. There was 1 postoperative death due to hepatic failure in the oldest patient of this series who had a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and concomitant liver fibrosis; 11 complications occurred in 6 patients, 4 of whom had grade III or above disease. After a mean follow-up of 17.1 ± 8.5 months, the overall survival was 89% at 3-6 and 12 months. The recurrence-free survival was 100%, 87.5% and 75% at 3-6-12 months respectively. The literature search yielded 148 articles, of which 22 articles published between 2012 and 2015 were included in this systematic review.ConclusionThe ALPPS technique effectively increased the resectability of otherwise inoperable liver tumors. The postoperative morbidity in our series was high in accordance with the data from the systematic review. Age, liver fibrosis and presence of biliary stenting were predisposing factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality.
| S-EPMC4689524 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBile leak after liver transplantation (LT) is commonly treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, there are limited data regarding the optimal treatment strategy.ObjectiveWe aimed to examine the role of ERCP in LT recipients with bile leaks at two large institutions.MethodsWe reviewed all ERCPs performed in LT recipients with bile leak and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis at two high-volume transplant centers.ResultsEighty patients were included. Forty-seven (59%) patients underwent ERCP with plastic stent placement (with or without sphincterotomy) and 33 patients (41%) underwent sphincterotomy alone. Complete resolution was obtained in 94% of the stent group vs. 58% of the sphincterotomy group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in three-month survival among both groups. Percutaneous transhepatic therapy and surgery were required in 4% and 6% in the stent group vs. 12% and 42% in the sphincterotomy group, respectively (p = 0.22 and p < 0.001). The only predictive factor of bile leak resolution was stent placement.ConclusionERCP with plastic stent placement is highly successful and more effective than sphincterotomy alone for post-LT bile leak treatment. These results indicate that ERCP and plastic stent placement should be considered the standard of care for the treatment of bile leaks in LT.
| S-EPMC5802677 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although liver resection has become an established procedure in western countries and South-east Asia it is still not performed frequently in most centres in India. In the last 10 years newly created specialized units have been performing more liver resections but no major series have been reported.We analysed the results of 241 hepatic resections in the Gyan Burman Liver Unit, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital to compare our results with those published from established centres and to identify the factors relating to morbidity and mortality. To examine the effect of a greater experience with the procedure we compared the outcome of our operations from 1996-2000 (first period) and those from 2001-2005 (second period).The overall mortality and morbidity rates were 6.6% and 44.8%, respectively, which are comparable with those of most recently published Western series. Life-threatening complications occurred in 12.4% patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of comorbid conditions, intraoperative blood transfusions of >3 units, hepatocellular carcinoma with underlying cirrhosis and gall bladder carcinoma with jaundice were the independent risk factors for morbidity, whereas the presence of comorbid illness and underlying liver cirrhosis were the risk factors for mortality. During the second period there was an increase in the number of operations performed (66 vs 175; first vs second period), but the mortality rates remained essentially unchanged (6.1% vs 6.8%).Hepatic resections can be performed safely in India with results comparable to those achieved in the West. Increasing experience did not reduce overall mortality. Perhaps more careful patient selection and better perioperative management of comorbid illnesses may reduce the morbidity and mortality further.
| S-EPMC2020779 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7330775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe 5-year survival of patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) to the liver is <2%. This review examines the published data on liver resections for MGC and analyses the rationale for potentially aggressive surgical management.MethodsA search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was used to identify studies published in English from 1990 to 2009 that reported on 10 or more patients who underwent liver resections for MGC. All available clinicopathologic data were analysed. In particular, we examined longterm survival and the characteristics of individuals surviving for >5 years.ResultsNineteen studies reported on 436 patients. Median 5-year survival was 26.5% (range: 0-60%). Overall, 13.4% (48/358) of patients were alive at 5 years and studies with extended follow-up reported that 4.0% (7/174) of patients survived for >10 years. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.5% (12/340 patients); however, the median mortality rate across the studies was 0%. No prognostic factor was found to be consistently statistically significant across these small studies.ConclusionsDespite the limitations of any analysis of retrospective data for highly selected groups of patients, it would appear that liver resections combined with systemic therapy for MGC can result in prolonged survival.
| S-EPMC2999785 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Most studies addressing the volume-outcome relationship in complex surgical procedures use hospital mortality as the sole outcome measure and are rarely based on detailed clinical data. The lack of reliable information about comorbidities and tumor stages makes the conclusions of these studies debatable. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for esophageal resections for cancer in low- versus high-volume hospitals, using an extensive set of variables concerning case-mix and outcome measures, including long-term survival. METHODS: Clinical data, from 903 esophageal resections performed between January 1990 and December 1999, were retrieved from the original patients' files. Three hundred and forty-two patients were operated on in 11 low-volume hospitals (<7 resections/year) and 561 in a single high-volume center. RESULTS: Mortality and morbidity rates were significantly lower in the high-volume center, which had an in-hospital mortality of 5 vs 13% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, hospital volume, but also the presence of comorbidity proved to be strong prognostic factors predicting in-hospital mortality (ORs 3.05 and 2.34). For stage I and II disease, there was a significantly better 5-year survival in the high-volume center. (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume and comorbidity patterns are important determinants of outcome in esophageal cancer surgery. Strong clinical endpoints such as in-hospital mortality and survival can be used as performance indicators, only if they are joined by reliable case-mix information.
| S-EPMC2190337 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a rising incidence and mortality in North America. Liver transplantation (LT) with adjunctive therapies offers excellent outcomes. However, HCC recurrences are associated with high mortality. We investigate whether adjuvant systemic therapy can reduce recurrence, as shown with other malignancies.MethodsMedical records of patients undergoing LT for HCC at a single center between January 2016 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) recipients of adjuvant sorafenib, (2) nonrecipients at high recurrence risk, and (3) nonrecipients at low risk by explant pathology features. The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were also propensity score matched 1:2 to nonadjuvant recipients based on recurrence risk features.ResultsDuring the study period, 273 patients with HCC underwent LT and 16 (5.9%) received adjuvant sorafenib therapy. Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were demographically similar to nonrecipients and, on explant pathology, had greater tumor burden, lymphovascular invasion, and poorer differentiation (all P < 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 12 adjuvant sorafenib recipients (75%). OS was similar among the 3 groups (P = 0.2), and adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-3.78; P = 0.62). RFS was significantly lower in sorafenib patients (hazard ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-23.05; P = 0.001). Following propensity matching, adjuvant sorafenib use was not associated with either OS (P = 0.24) or RFS rates (P = 0.65).ConclusionsIn this single-center analysis, adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS. Recipients were observed to have shorter RFS, likely due to the increased prevalence of high-risk features, and sorafenib use was associated with high frequencies of adverse events.
| S-EPMC11759322 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as the best therapeutic modality for end-stage liver disease in pediatric autoimmune liver disease (AILD). We aimed to describe our experience of pediatric living donor liver transplantation for AILD from India over a period of 10 years. We did a retrospective analysis of 244 liver transplants at our center over the last 10 years to identify children with AILD (18 years or younger). We aimed to describe the demographic features, clinical profile, graft survival, patient outcome, and predictors of mortality in our cohort. Between July 2010 and May 2020, 13 liver transplants were performed for AILD out of total 244 children transplanted over the last 10 years at our center. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at LT was 12 (± 3.84) years. Leading indications for LT were decompensated liver disease (61.5%), acute-on-chronic liver failure (23.1%), acute liver failure (ALF) (7.7%), and recurrent cholangitis and growth failure (7.7%). Mean Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) score/model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and international normalized ratio (INR) (SD) at presentation were 24 (± 12.81) and 2.48 (± 1.54), respectively. Median discharge duration was 23 days (interquartile range [IQR] 21-36 days). 30.7% (4/13) of the subjects had no postoperative complications. Diarrhea (15.3%), pneumonia (7.7%), jejunostomy site bleed (7.7%), tacrolimus toxicity (7.7%), and vascular complications (7.7%) were seen, which resolved with satisfactory graft function. Three subjects died post-LT; causes of death included sepsis (n=3), renal dysfunction (n=1), and pneumonia (n=1). Others have been well on follow-up with no graft rejection or need for re-transplantation. Overall, 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 76.9% and 70%, respectively. Lower platelet count, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) 2, and PELD/MELD score were found to be significant predictors of mortality on univariate analysis, which were not significant on multivariate modelling. The complications, graft and patient survival rates in our experience were quite encouraging, and are comparable with the best centers worldwide. After instituting appropriate treatment, early referral of such patients to an equipped center should be facilitated.
| S-EPMC9791963 | biostudies-literature