Dataset Information

Outcomes of On-Label Reduced-Dose Edoxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The LEDIOS Registry.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective in preventing thromboembolisms and reduce the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin. There are few reports on the outcomes of on-label reduced-dose NOACs. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of on-label reduced-dose edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

This study is a multi-center, prospective, non-interventional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of on-label reduced-dose edoxaban in patients with AF. We evaluated outcomes of major bleeding, stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause death, and composite clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 2,448 patients (mean age 75.0 ± 8.3 years, 801 [32.7%] males) was included in the present study. The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.7 ± 1.5. Major bleeding events occurred at a rate of 1.34%/yr. The event rate of strokes and systemic embolisms was 1.13%/yr. The overall net clinical outcomes occurred at a rate of 3.19%/yr. There were no significant differences according to the number of dose reduction criteria, renal dysfunction, or body weight. Higher HAS-BLED score and higher combination of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED score was associated with an increased risk of composite clinical outcomes compared to the lower score groups.

Conclusions

This study was the largest prospective real-world study to investigate the safety and efficacy of on-label low-dose edoxaban in an Asian population. Reduced-dose edoxaban can be used safely in patients with severe renal dysfunction or extremely low body weight. Our observation suggests that physicians should consider bleeding risk even in a low-dose regimen.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03554837.

SUBMITTER: Kim JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9745682 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outcomes of On-Label Reduced-Dose Edoxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The LEDIOS Registry.

Kim Ju Youn JY Choi Eue Keun EK Lim Hong Euy HE Oh Yong-Seog YS Cho Youngjin Y Cho Youngjin Y On Young Keun YK

Journal of Korean medical science 20221212 48

<h4>Background</h4>Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective in preventing thromboembolisms and reduce the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin. There are few reports on the outcomes of on-label reduced-dose NOACs. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of on-label reduced-dose edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).<h4>Methods</h4>This study is a multi-center, prospective, non-interventional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy o ...[more]

PMID: 36513051

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age and is more common in frail patients. However, data are lacking on outcomes of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in very elderly patients with AF with frailty, who are ineligible for standard anticoagulant treatment.ObjectiveTo compare very-low-dose edoxaban (15 mg daily) vs placebo across frailty status, including each of 5 frailty assessment parameters, among patients with AF involved in the ELDERCARE-AF (Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients) trial.Design, setting, and participantsThis is a cohort study using data from ELDERCARE-AF, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of Japanese patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were ineligible for OACs at doses approved for stroke prevention because of their high bleeding risks. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive edoxaban or placebo. The study duration was from August 5, 2016, to November 5, 2019, with the last patient followed up on December 27, 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 2021 to February 2022.ExposureEdoxaban (15 mg) once daily or placebo.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding.ResultsA total of 984 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (492 each to the edoxaban and placebo groups); 944 patients (402 frail patients [42.6%]; 542 nonfrail patients [57.4%]; mean [SD] age, 86.6 [4.3] years; 541 women [57.3%]) were included in this analysis. In the placebo group, the estimated event rates (SE) for stroke or systemic embolism were 7.1% (1.6%) per patient-year in the frail group and 6.1% (1.3%) per patient-year in the nonfrail group. Edoxaban was associated with lower event rates for stroke or systemic embolism with no interaction with frailty status or frailty assessment parameters. Major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were both numerically higher in the edoxaban group than in the placebo group, and no heterogeneity was observed with frailty status. Although both all-cause death and net clinical composite outcome occurred more frequently in the frail group than in the nonfrail group, there was no association with frailty status between the edoxaban and placebo groups.Conclusions and relevanceRegardless of frailty status, among Japanese patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were ineligible for standard OACs, once-daily 15-mg edoxaban was associated with reduced incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and may be a suitable treatment option for these patients.

Project description:Whereas insurance status has been previously associated with care patterns, little is currently known about the association between Medicaid insurance and the clinical characteristics, treatment, or outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).We used data from adults with AF enrolled in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of AF (ORBIT-AF), a national outpatient registry conducted at 176 community, multispecialty sites. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients prescribed any oral anticoagulation (OAC; warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants [NOAC]). Secondary outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients prescribed NOACs (dabigatran or rivaroxaban); time in therapeutic range (TTR) for warfarin users, all-cause mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleed. Of 10 133 patients, N=470 (4.6%) had Medicaid insurance. Medicaid patients were similarly likely to receive OAC at baseline (72.8% vs 76.3%; unadjusted P=0.079), but less likely to receive NOAC at baseline or follow-up (12.1% vs 16.3%; unadjusted P=0.019). After risk adjustment, Medicaid status was associated with lower use of OAC at baseline among patients with high stroke risk (odds ratio [OR]=0.68; 95% CI=0.49, 0.94), but was not associated with OAC use overall (OR=0.82; 95% CI=0.61, 1.09). Among warfarin users, median TTR was lower among Medicaid patients (60% vs 68%; P<0.0001; adjusted TTR difference, -2.9; 95% CI=-5.7, -0.2; P=0.04). Use of an NOAC over 2 years of follow-up was not statistically different by insurance. Compared with non-Medicaid patients, Medicaid patients had higher unadjusted rates of mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding; however, these differences were attenuated following adjustment for clinical characteristics.In a contemporary AF cohort, use of OAC overall and use of NOACs were not significantly lower among Medicaid patients relative to others. However, among warfarin users, Medicaid patients spent less time in therapeutic range compared with those with other forms of insurance.

Project description:Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are indicated for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) but require lower doses in certain patients. We sought to describe the frequency, appropriateness (according to Food and Drug Administration labeling), and outcomes of patients prescribed reduced doses of NOACs in community practice. We analyzed data from the ORBIT-AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II) registry, a prospective, national, observational registry of AF patients. Among 7925 AF patients receiving NOACs, we assessed patterns of use of reduced NOAC doses and associated cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes at median follow-up of 1 year. Overall, 6636 patients (84%) received a NOAC at standard dose, which was consistent with US Food and Drug Administration labeling in 6376 (96%). Reduced NOAC dose was prescribed to 1289 (16% overall), which was consistent with Food and Drug Administration labeling in only 555 patients (43%). Compared with those whose NOAC dose was appropriately reduced, patients receiving inappropriate dose reductions were younger (median age 79 versus 84, P<0.0001) and had lower ORBIT bleeding risk scores (26% ≥4 versus 45%, P<0.0001). Compared with those appropriately receiving standard dosing, patients receiving inappropriately reduced-dose NOACs had higher unadjusted rates of thromboembolic events (2.11 versus 1.35 events per 100 patient years, hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 0.92-2.67) and death (6.77 versus 2.60, hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.86-3.67). After adjustment, outcomes were not significantly different but tended to favor patients dosed appropriately. The majority of dose reductions of NOACs in AF are inconsistent with US Food and Drug Administration recommendations. There appear to be opportunities to improve current NOAC dosing in community practice. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01701817.

Dataset Information

Outcomes of On-Label Reduced-Dose Edoxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The LEDIOS Registry.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

Outcomes of On-Label Reduced-Dose Edoxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The LEDIOS Registry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets