EOSCE stations live versus remote evaluation and scores variability.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are known to be a fair evaluation method. These recent years, the use of online OSCEs (eOSCEs) has spread. This study aimed to compare remote versus live evaluation and assess the factors associated with score variability during eOSCEs.

Methods

We conducted large-scale eOSCEs at the medical school of the Université de Paris Cité in June 2021 and recorded all the students' performances, allowing a second evaluation. To assess the agreement in our context of multiple raters and students, we fitted a linear mixed model with student and rater as random effects and the score as an explained variable.

Results

One hundred seventy observations were analyzed for the first station after quality control. We retained 1

SUBMITTER: Bouzid D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9745699 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature