Gender bias and menstrual blood in stem cell research: A review of pubmed articles (2008-2020).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Despite proven scientific quality of menstrual blood mesenchymal cells, research and science output using those cells is still incipient, which suggests there is a resistance to the study of this type of cell by scientists, and a lack of attention to its potential for cell therapy, regenerative medicine and bioengineering. This study analyzes the literature about the menstrual blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (mbMSC) on the PubMed database between 2008-2020 and the social attention it received on Twitter. A comparative analysis showed that mbMSC accounts for a very small portion of mesenchymal cell research (0.25%). Most first authors are women (53.2%), whereas most last authors are men (63.74%), reinforcing an already known, and still significant, gender gap between last and correspon
SUBMITTER: Manica DT
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9754585 | biostudies-literature | 2022
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA