Dataset Information

Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Non-US citizen international medical graduates (IMGs) make up a significant proportion of the physician workforce, especially in physician shortage areas and specialties. IMGs face barriers matriculating in US residency programs. Whether a program reports accepting J-1 visas and sponsoring H-1B visas influences their decision to apply, it remains unclear which institutional factors shape programs' likelihood to consider visa-seeking applicants.

Objective

We investigated factors associated with programs reporting accepting J-1 visas or sponsoring H-1B visas for non-citizen applicants in internal medicine, the specialty most sought after by IMGs.

Methods

We performed multivariable regression analyses using publicly available data to identify characteristics associated with reported visa acceptance (J-1 and or H-1B). Covariates included university affiliation, program size, program type (academic, university-affiliated community, or community), and Doximity reputation ranking.

Results

We identified 419 programs: 267 (63.7%) reported accepting J-1 visas. Among programs that accepted J-1 visas, 65.6% (n=175) accepted only J-1 visas while 34.5% (n=92) sponsored H-1B and accepted J-1 visas. Ranking in the third quartile (vs first quartile) was associated with lower odds of accepting J-1 (aOR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.87; P=.04) and sponsoring H-1B visas (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.76; P=.02). Community status (vs academic) was associated with lower odds of accepting J-1 visas (aOR 0.2; 95% CI 0.06-0.64; P=.007), as was county hospital affiliation vs non-county hospitals (aOR 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.42; P<.001).

Conclusions

While prior evidence shows that most internal medicine programs that substantially enroll IMGs are low ranking, high-ranking internal medicine programs are paradoxically more likely to report that they consider and sponsor visa-seeking applicants.

SUBMITTER: Tiako MJN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9765918 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

Tiako Max Jordan Nguemeni MJN Fatola Ayotola A Nwadiuko Joseph J

Journal of graduate medical education 20221201 6

<h4>Background</h4>Non-US citizen international medical graduates (IMGs) make up a significant proportion of the physician workforce, especially in physician shortage areas and specialties. IMGs face barriers matriculating in US residency programs. Whether a program reports accepting J-1 visas and sponsoring H-1B visas influences their decision to apply, it remains unclear which institutional factors shape programs' likelihood to consider visa-seeking applicants.<h4>Objective</h4>We investigated ...[more]

PMID: 36591431

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceHealth disparities continue to exist despite the call to increase education of health care practitioners. An assessment of health disparities education has not been previously studied in a national cohort.ObjectiveTo describe and compare the curriculum on health disparities from the perspective of program directors and perceptions of training among internal medicine residents.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional survey study used a survey of US internal medicine program directors, the 2015 Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey, which included questions about health disparities curriculum, and a 1-time survey of US internal medicine residents that asked questions related to their training in health disparities on the American College of Physicians 2015 Internal Medicine In-Training Examination. All internal medicine program directors who were members of Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (368 of 396 accredited programs), and internal medicine residents who took the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination were eligible. Final analysis of the merged data set was completed in 2018.ExposuresQuestions were included on the annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine survey and the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination.Main outcomes and measuresProgram directors reported on presence of health disparities curriculum, educational methods, quality, barriers and challenges to curriculum, and Clinical Learning Environment Review. Residents reported whether they received training and quality of the training in health disparities.ResultsA total of 227 program directors (response rate, 61.7%) and 22 723 residents (response rate, 87.2%) responded to the surveys. A total of 90 program directors (39.6%) reported a curriculum in health disparities, but among these, only 16 program directors (17.8%) felt quality of their education was very good or excellent. In more than half of the programs (52 programs [55.9%]), outcomes of the curriculum were not measured. After merging, the combined data set included 18 883 residents from 366 APDIM member programs with 225 program director responses. Among these, 13 251 residents (70.2%) reported some training in caring for patients at risk for health disparities. Of residents who reported receiving training, 10 494 (79.2%) rated the quality as very good or excellent.Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that that despite the Clinical Learning Environment Review mandate and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education required competencies for training in health disparities, relatively few internal medicine programs in the US provided educational curriculum. Additionally, the existence of health disparities curricula in internal medicine training programs was not associated with resident's perception of training or its quality.

Project description:ImportanceIncreasing underrepresented in medicine (URIM) physicians among historically underserved communities helps reduce health disparities. The concordance of URIM physicians with their communities improves access to care, particularly for American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, and Hispanic or Latinx individuals.ObjectivesTo explore county-level racial and ethnic representation of US internal medicine (IM) residents, examine racial and ethnic concordance between residents and their communities, and assess whether representation varies by presence of academic institutions or underserved settings.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study collected data from the Association of American Medical Colleges, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), Area Health Resources Files, and US Department of Education data on ACGME-accredited US IM residency programs and their associated county populations. Self-reported racial and ethnic data from 2018 for 4848 residents in 393 IM programs in 205 counties were used. Data were analyzed between February 15 and September 20, 2024.ExposureCounty-level presence for academic health centers (AHCs), minority-serving institutions (MSIs), health professional shortage areas (HPSAs), and rurality.Main outcomes and measuresMain outcomes were representation quotients (RQs) or the ratio of the proportion of IM residents and their concordant county-level racial and ethnic populations. Quantile linear regression models on median representation were used to identify the association with URIM, Asian, and White residents by US Census division and county-level AHCs, MSIs, HPSAs, and rurality.ResultsAmong 4848 residents, 4 (0.08%) self-identified as American Indian or Alaskan Native, 1709 (35.3%) as Asian, 289 (6.0%) as Black, 211 (4.4%) as Hispanic or Latinx, 2 (0.04%) as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 2633 (54.3%) as White. A total of 761 (15.7%) were classified as URIM. Among URIM groups, American Indian and Alaska Native (mean [SE] RQ, 0.00 [0.04]), Black (mean [SE] RQ, 0.09 [0.20]), Hispanic and Latinx (mean [SE] RQ, 0.00 [0.04]), and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (mean [SE] RQ, 0.00 [0.26]) residents were grossly underrepresented compared with their training sites' county-level representation. Fifty-one of 205 counties (24.8%) with IM programs had no URIM residents. Black and Hispanic or Latinx residents had higher representation in counties with more MSIs (mean [SD] RQ, 0.19 [0.24]; P = .04; mean [SD] RQ, 0.15 [0.04]; P < .001, respectively), and Hispanic or Latinx residents were less represented in counties with more AHCs (mean [SD] RQ, 0.00 [0.06]; P < .001). Asian residents had lower RQs in counties with more MSIs (mean [SD] RQ, 6.00 [0.65]; P < .001), and White residents had higher representation in counties with greater presence of AHCs (mean [SD] RQ, 0.77 [0.04]; P = .007).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study, URIM IM residents remained underrepresented compared with their program's county populations. These findings should inform racial and ethnic diversity policies to address the continuing underrepresentation among graduate medical education physicians, which adversely impacts the care of historically underserved communities.

Project description:BackgroundEmergency medicine (EM) applicants are encouraged to consider their own "competitiveness" when deciding on the number of applications to submit. Program directors rank the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) as the most important factor when reviewing an applicant. Accurate insight into how clinical performance is reflected on the SLOE could improve medical students' ability to gauge their own competitiveness.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine the accuracy of students' self-assessment by SLOE evaluation measures when compared to the SLOE completed by faculty after their EM clerkship.MethodsParticipants of this multicenter study included fourth-year medical students who had completed their EM clerkship and were applying to EM residency. Students completed a modified SLOE to reflect rankings they believed they would receive on their official SLOE. Additionally, students completed a survey assessing their knowledge of the SLOE, their perception of feedback during the clerkship, and their self-perceived competitiveness as an EM applicant. Correlation between the rankings on the student-completed SLOE and the official SLOE was analyzed using the Kendall correlation.ResultsOf the 49 eligible students, 42 (85.7%) completed the study. The correlation between scores on the student-completed and official SLOE were significantly low (r < 0.68) for each item. The majority of students agreed that they were satisfied by the quantity and quality of feedback they received (31/42, 73.8%). Few students agreed that they knew how many applications to submit to ensure a match in EM (7/42, 16.7%).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that students did not accurately predict their rankings on the official SLOE at the end of an EM rotation and had little insight into their competitiveness as an applicant. These findings highlight opportunities to mitigate the burden on students and programs caused by the increasing number of applications per applicant. Further research is needed as to whether strategies to increase insight into competitiveness are effective.

Dataset Information

Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets