Dataset Information

CRISPR-Cas Controls Cryptic Prophages.

ABSTRACT: The bacterial archetypal adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas, is thought to be repressed in the best-studied bacterium, Escherichia coli K-12. We show here that the E. coli CRISPR-Cas system is active and serves to inhibit its nine defective (i.e., cryptic) prophages. Specifically, compared to the wild-type strain, reducing the amounts of specific interfering RNAs (crRNA) decreases growth by 40%, increases cell death by 700%, and prevents persister cell resuscitation. Similar results were obtained by inactivating CRISPR-Cas by deleting the entire 13 spacer region (CRISPR array); hence, CRISPR-Cas serves to inhibit the remaining deleterious effects of these cryptic prophages, most likely through CRISPR array-derived crRNA binding to cryptic prophage mRNA rather than through cleavage of cryptic prophage DNA, i.e., self-targeting. Consistently, four of the 13 E. coli spacers contain complementary regions to the mRNA sequences of seven cryptic prophages, and inactivation of CRISPR-Cas increases the level of mRNA for lysis protein YdfD of cryptic prophage Qin and lysis protein RzoD of cryptic prophage DLP-12. In addition, lysis is clearly seen via transmission electron microscopy when the whole CRISPR-Cas array is deleted, and eliminating spacer #12, which encodes crRNA with complementary regions for DLP-12 (including rzoD), Rac, Qin (including ydfD), and CP4-57 cryptic prophages, also results in growth inhibition and cell lysis. Therefore, we report the novel results that (i) CRISPR-Cas is active in E. coli and (ii) CRISPR-Cas is used to tame cryptic prophages, likely through RNAi, i.e., unlike with active lysogens, active CRISPR-Cas and cryptic prophages may stably co-exist.

SUBMITTER: Song S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9782134 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CRISPR-Cas Controls Cryptic Prophages.

Song Sooyeon S Semenova Ekaterina E Severinov Konstantin K Fernández-García Laura L Benedik Michael J MJ Maeda Toshinari T Wood Thomas K TK

International journal of molecular sciences 20221219 24

The bacterial archetypal adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas, is thought to be repressed in the best-studied bacterium, <i>Escherichia coli</i> K-12. We show here that the <i>E. coli</i> CRISPR-Cas system is active and serves to inhibit its nine defective (i.e., cryptic) prophages. Specifically, compared to the wild-type strain, reducing the amounts of specific interfering RNAs (crRNA) decreases growth by 40%, increases cell death by 700%, and prevents persister cell resuscitation. Similar result ...[more]

PMID: 36555835

Similar Datasets

Project description:Understanding how pathogens maintain their virulence is critical to developing tools to mitigate disease in animal populations. We sequenced and assembled the first draft genome of Roseofilum reptotaenium AO1, the dominant cyanobacterium underlying pathogenicity of the virulent coral black band disease (BBD), and analyzed parts of the BBD-associated Geitlerinema sp. BBD_1991 genome in silico. Both cyanobacteria are equipped with an adaptive, heritable clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas defense system type I-D and have potential virulence genes located within several prophage regions. The defense system helps to prevent infection by viruses and mobile genetic elements via identification of short fingerprints of the intruding DNA, which are stored as templates in the bacterial genome, in so-called "CRISPRs." Analysis of CRISPR target sequences (protospacers) revealed an unusually high number of self-targeting spacers in R. reptotaenium AO1 and extraordinary long CRIPSR arrays of up to 260 spacers in Geitlerinema sp. BBD_1991. The self-targeting spacers are unlikely to be a form of autoimmunity; instead these target an incomplete lysogenic bacteriophage. Lysogenic virus induction experiments with mitomycin C and UV light did not reveal an actively replicating virus population in R. reptotaenium AO1 cultures, suggesting that phage functionality is compromised or excision could be blocked by the CRISPR-Cas system. Potential prophages were identified in three regions of R. reptotaenium AO1 and five regions of Geitlerinema sp. BBD_1991, containing putative BBD relevant virulence genes, such as an NAD-dependent epimerase/dehydratase (a homolog in terms of functionality to the third and fourth most expressed gene in BBD), lysozyme/metalloendopeptidases and other lipopolysaccharide modification genes. To date, viruses have not been considered to be a component of the BBD consortium or a contributor to the virulence of R. reptotaenium AO1 and Geitlerinema sp. BBD_1991. We suggest that the presence of virulence genes in potential prophage regions, and the CRISPR-Cas defense systems are evidence of an arms race between the respective cyanobacteria and their bacteriophage predators. The presence of such a defense system likely reduces the number of successful bacteriophage infections and mortality in the cyanobacteria, facilitating the progress of BBD.

Project description:Prophage integration, release, and dissemination exert various effects on host bacteria. In the genus Lactobacillus, they may cause bacteriophage contamination during fermentation and even regulate bacterial populations in the gut. However, little is known about their distribution, genetic architecture, and relationships with their hosts. Here, we conducted prophage prediction analysis on 1,472 genomes from 16 different Lactobacillus species and found prophage fragments in almost all lactobacilli (99.8%), with 1,459 predicted intact prophages identified in 64.1% of the strains. We present an uneven prophage distribution among Lactobacillus species; multihabitat species retained more prophages in their genomes than restricted-habitat species. Characterization of the genome features, average nucleotide identity, and landscape visualization presented a high genome diversity of Lactobacillus prophages. We detected antibiotic resistance genes in more than 10% of Lactobacillus prophages and validated that the occurrence of resistance genes conferred by prophage integration was possibly associated with phenotypic resistance in Lactobacillus plantarum. Furthermore, our broad and comprehensive examination of the distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems across the genomes predicted type I and type III systems as potential antagonistic elements of Lactobacillus prophage. IMPORTANCE Lactobacilli are inherent microorganisms in the human gut and are widely used in the food processing industries due to their probiotic properties. Prophages were reportedly hidden in numerous Lactobacillus genomes and can potentially contaminate entire batches of fermentation or modulate the intestinal microecology once they are released. Therefore, a comprehensive scanning of prophages in Lactobacillus is essential for the safety evaluation and application development of probiotic candidates. We show that prophages are widely distributed among lactobacilli; however, intact prophages are more common in multihabitat species and display wide variations in genome feature, integration site, and genomic organization. Our data of the prophage-mediated antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and the resistance phenotype of lactobacilli provide evidence for deciphering the putative role of prophages as vectors of the ARGs. Furthermore, understanding the association between prophages and CRISPR-Cas systems is crucial to appreciate the coevolution of phages and Lactobacillus.

Dataset Information

CRISPR-Cas Controls Cryptic Prophages.

Publications

CRISPR-Cas Controls Cryptic Prophages.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets