Dataset Information
Combined nasal- and oropharyngeal self-swab provides equivalent performance compared to professionally collected oropharyngeal swabs in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a real-life setting.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To investigate the performance of a combined nasal midturbinate- and oropharyngeal (NAOP) self-swab compared to a deep oropharyngeal (OP) swab by health care workers (HCW) in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a real-life setting.Methods
Paired swabs from 1119 participants were included. RT-PCR were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in both swab samples.Results
330 participants tested positive. The sensitivity of the combined self-swab and OP swab was 96.9 % and 95.4 % respectively, whereas the Ct-values for self-swabs were significantly lower compared to OP swabs.Conclusion
The combined NAOP self-swab outperformed the OP swab and thus, the NAOP self-swab may be an alternative sampling method under the given circumstances.
SUBMITTER: Horlyck S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9783189 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Combined nasal- and oropharyngeal self-swab provides equivalent performance compared to professionally collected oropharyngeal swabs in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a real-life setting.
Journal of virological methods 20221223
<h4>Purpose</h4>To investigate the performance of a combined nasal midturbinate- and oropharyngeal (NAOP) self-swab compared to a deep oropharyngeal (OP) swab by health care workers (HCW) in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a real-life setting.<h4>Methods</h4>Paired swabs from 1119 participants were included. RT-PCR were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in both swab samples.<h4>Results</h4>330 participants tested positive. The sensitivity of the combined self-swab and OP swab was 96.9 % and 95.4 % respectively, ...[more]