Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes - a scoping review of evidence syntheses.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A systematically and transparently prepared research priority-setting process within a specific scientific area is essential in order to develop a comprehensive and progressive evidence-based approach that will have a substantial societal impact on the site of interest. On the basis of two consensus workshops, the authors suggest the following methods for all such processes: use of experts, stakeholder involvement, literature review, and ranking.

Objectives

The identification, categorisation, and discussion of methods for preparing a research prioritisation process.

Methods

Eligibility criteria: Evidence synthesis includes original studies presenting a research prioritisation process and which listed the methods used to create a research prioritisation proc

SUBMITTER: Lund H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9784020 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature