Dataset Information

Safety of daprodustat in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: A pooled analysis of phase 3 studies in Japan.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Daprodustat is an approved treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Japan.

Methods

This post hoc analysis evaluated pooled safety data for daprodustat from 3 phase 3 Japanese studies in dialysis-dependent and nondialysis patients with anemia of CKD.

Results

Median drug exposure duration was 365 days for both daprodustat (N = 369) and injectable erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA, N = 285). The incidence per 100 patient-years of on-therapy adverse events (AEs) was 363.1 and 306.4 in the daprodustat and ESA groups, respectively. The incidence per 100 patient-years of thromboembolic and retinal events were 5.55 and 6.91 (daprodustat) and 6.28 and 7.46 (ESA), respectively. Cardiovascular and malignancy events were similar between groups, although analysis of these were limited by sample size and study duration.

Conclusion

The safety of daprodustat was comparable to ESA in this pooled analysis, although further large-scale research is needed to evaluate long-term risks including cardiovascular and malignancy events.

SUBMITTER: Nangaku M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9790622 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety of daprodustat in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: A pooled analysis of phase 3 studies in Japan.

Nangaku Masaomi M Akizawa Tadao T Nagakubo Takashi T Yonekawa Taeko T Kimura Toshifumi T Endo Yukihiro Y Cobitz Alexander A

Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy 20220406 6

<h4>Introduction</h4>Daprodustat is an approved treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Japan.<h4>Methods</h4>This post hoc analysis evaluated pooled safety data for daprodustat from 3 phase 3 Japanese studies in dialysis-dependent and nondialysis patients with anemia of CKD.<h4>Results</h4>Median drug exposure duration was 365 days for both daprodustat (N = 369) and injectable erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA, N = 285). The incidence per 100 patient-years of on-therapy adve ...[more]

PMID: 35312234

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: Daprodustat is a novel oral agent in treating anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and several clinical trials have been conducted to compare daprodustat with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) or placebo. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat for anemia treatment in both dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) patients. Methods: Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting daprodustat vs. rhEPO or placebo for anemia patients in CKD. The outcome indicators were focused on hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: Eight eligible studies with 1,516 participants were included. For both NDD and DD patients, changes in Hb levels from baseline were significantly higher in daprodustat group than that in the placebo (mean difference (MD) = 1.73, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34 to 3.12], p = 0.01; MD = 1.88, [95% CI, 0.68 to 3.09], p = 0.002; respectively), and there was no significant difference between daprodustat and rhEPO group (MD = 0.05, [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.59], p = 0.86; MD = 0.12, [95% CI, -0.28 to 0.52], p = 0.55; respectively). The indexes of iron metabolism were improved significantly in the daprodustat group compared to placebo- or rhEPO-treated patients, while there was no similar change in terms of TSAT for DD patients. Furthermore, no trend of increasing plasma VEGF was observed in daprodustat-treated subjects. As for safety, there was no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs between daprodustat and placebo treatment, while the incidence of SAEs in the daprodustat group was significantly lower than that in the rhEPO group. Conclusion: Daprodustat was efficacious and well tolerated for anemia in both NDD and DD patients in the short term based on current RCTs. And daprodustat may become an effective alternative for treatment of anemia with CKD. Since the application of daprodustat is still under exploration, future researches should consider the limitations of our study to evaluate the value of daprodustat.

Project description:ImportanceDaprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being evaluated as an oral alternative to conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. Few studies of anemia treatment in an incident dialysis (ID) population have been reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of chronic kidney disease in ID patients.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted from May 11, 2017, through September 24, 2020, in 90 centers across 14 countries. Patients with advanced CKD were eligible if they planned to start dialysis within 6 weeks from screening or had started and received hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 90 days before randomization, had a screening hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 8.0 to 10.5 g/dL (to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10) and a randomization Hb of 8.0 to 11.0 g/dL, were ESA-naive or had received limited ESA treatment, and were iron-replete.InterventionsRandomized 1:1 to daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary analysis in the intent-to-treat population evaluated the mean change in Hb concentration from baseline to evaluation period (weeks 28-52) to assess noninferiority of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g/dL). The mean monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose from baseline to week 52 was the principal secondary end point. Rates of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events (AEs) were also compared between treatment groups to assess safety and tolerability.ResultsA total of 312 patients (median [IQR] age, 55 [45-65] years; 194 [62%] male) were randomized to either daprodustat (157 patients; median [IQR] age, 52.0 [45-63] years; 96 [61%] male) or darbepoetin alfa (155 patients; median [IQR] age, 56.0 [45-67] years; 98 [63%] male); 306 patients (98%) completed the trial. The mean (SD) Hb concentration during the evaluation period was 10.5 (1.0) g/dL for the daprodustat and 10.6 (0.9) g/dL for the darbepoetin alfa group, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of -0.10 g/dL (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.14 g/dL), indicating noninferiority. There was a reduction in mean monthly IV iron use from baseline to week 52 in both treatment groups; however, daprodustat was not superior compared with darbepoetin alfa in reducing monthly IV iron use (adjusted mean treatment difference, 19.4 mg [95% CI, -11.0 to 49.9 mg]). Adverse event rates were 76% for daprodustat vs 72% for darbepoetin alfa.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of CKD and may represent a potential oral alternative to a conventional ESA in the ID population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03029208.

Project description:IntroductionThis integrated phase 3 analysis examined efficacy and cardiovascular safety for roxadustat vs erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis-dependent patients.MethodsEfficacy and safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to ESAs (PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, ROCKIES) in dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) were evaluated by study, pooled population and in two subgroups: incident dialysis and stable dialysis. The primary efficacy endpoint per study was hemoglobin change from baseline (CFB) to weeks 28-36 using least-squares mean difference (LSMD) without rescue therapy. Pooled safety endpoints included time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality [ACM]) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), ACM, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8 and 1.3 margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized.ResultsIn total, 4714 patients were randomized (2354 roxadustat; 2360 ESA). Hemoglobin CFB to weeks 28-36 achieved non-inferiority for roxadustat vs ESA in each study. Roxadustat was non-inferior to ESA for risks for MACE and MACE+ in the entire cohort (MACE: HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.26; MACE+ : HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.11) and similar to the incident dialysis and stable dialysis subgroups; ACM results were consistent with MACE and MACE+ (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95-1.34). TEAEs were generally comparable between groups.ConclusionRoxadustat improved hemoglobin similarly to ESA while demonstrating comparable cardiovascular and overall safety profiles in a wide spectrum of dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of CKD. Roxadustat represents an oral alternative to ESAs for achieving a target hemoglobin for anemia of CKD in dialysis-dependent patients.

Project description:BackgroundMolidustat, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The efficacy and safety of molidustat were recently evaluated in three 16-week phase 2b studies. Here, we report the results of two long-term extension studies of molidustat.MethodsBoth studies were parallel-group, open-label, multicenter studies of ≤36 months' duration, in patients with anemia due to CKD, and included an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as active control. One study enrolled patients not receiving dialysis (n = 164), and the other enrolled patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 88). The primary efficacy variable for both studies was change in blood hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to each post-baseline visit, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn patients not on dialysis, the mean ± SD Hb concentrations at baseline were 11.28 ± 0.55 g/dL for molidustat and 11.08 ± 0.51 g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations throughout the study (defined as mean of each patient's overall study Hb levels) were 11.10 ± 0.508 and 10.98 ± 0.571 g/dL in patients treated with molidustat and darbepoetin, respectively. Similar proportions of patients reported at least one AE in the molidustat (85.6%) and darbepoetin (85.7%) groups. In patients on dialysis, mean ± SD Hb levels at baseline were 10.40 ± 0.70 and 10.52 ± 0.53 g/dL in the molidustat and epoetin groups, respectively. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations during the study were 10.37 ± 0.56 g/dL in the molidustat group and 10.52 ± 0.47 g/dL in the epoetin group. Proportions of patients who reported at least one AE were 91.2% in the molidustat group and 93.3% in the epoetin group.ConclusionsMolidustat was well tolerated for up to 36 months and appears to be an effective alternative to darbepoetin and epoetin in the long-term management of anemia associated with CKD.

Dataset Information

Safety of daprodustat in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: A pooled analysis of phase 3 studies in Japan.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Safety of daprodustat in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: A pooled analysis of phase 3 studies in Japan.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets