Consensus and controversy in the discipline of invasion science.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Approaches, values, and perceptions in invasion science are highly dynamic, and like in other disciplines, views among different people can diverge. This has led to debate in the field specifically surrounding the core themes of values, management, impacts, and terminology. Considering these debates, we surveyed 698 scientists and practitioners globally to assess levels of polarization (opposing views) on core and contentious topics. The survey was distributed online (via Google Forms) and promoted through listservs and social media. Although there were generally high levels of consensus among respondents, there was some polarization (scores of ≥0.39 [top quartile]). Relating to values, there was high polarization regarding claims of invasive species denialism, whether invasive species con
SUBMITTER: Shackleton RT
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9805150 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA