Dataset Information

Microbiome Toolbox: methodological approaches to derive and visualize microbiome trajectories.

ABSTRACT:

Motivation

The gut microbiome changes rapidly under the influence of different factors such as age, dietary changes or medications to name just a few. To analyze and understand such changes, we present a Microbiome Toolbox. We implemented several methods for analysis and exploration to provide interactive visualizations for easy comprehension and reporting of longitudinal microbiome data.

Results

Based on the abundance of microbiome features such as taxa as well as functional capacity modules, and with the corresponding metadata per sample, the Microbiome Toolbox includes methods for (i) data analysis and exploration, (ii) data preparation including dataset-specific preprocessing and transformation, (iii) best feature selection for log-ratio denominators, (iv) two-group analysis, (v) microbiome trajectory prediction with feature importance over time, (vi) spline and linear regression statistical analysis for testing universality across different groups and differentiation of two trajectories, (vii) longitudinal anomaly detection on the microbiome trajectory and (viii) simulated intervention to return anomaly back to a reference trajectory.

Availability and implementation

The software tools are open source and implemented in Python. For developers interested in additional functionality of the Microbiome Toolbox, it is modular allowing for further extension with custom methods and analysis. The code, python package and the link to the interactive dashboard of Microbiome Toolbox are available on GitHub https://github.com/JelenaBanjac/microbiome-toolbox.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Banjac J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9825749 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Microbiome Toolbox: methodological approaches to derive and visualize microbiome trajectories.

Banjac Jelena J Sprenger Norbert N Dogra Shaillay Kumar SK

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20230101 1

<h4>Motivation</h4>The gut microbiome changes rapidly under the influence of different factors such as age, dietary changes or medications to name just a few. To analyze and understand such changes, we present a Microbiome Toolbox. We implemented several methods for analysis and exploration to provide interactive visualizations for easy comprehension and reporting of longitudinal microbiome data.<h4>Results</h4>Based on the abundance of microbiome features such as taxa as well as functional capa ...[more]

PMID: 36469345

Similar Datasets

Project description:STUDY QUESTION:Which methodological approaches are most appropriate for analyzing IVF data with multiple cycles in the context of a binary outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER:Both mixed effect models and generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling approaches can account for multiple IVF cycles and may reduce bias over first-cycle only approaches, but CIs were narrowest with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation models (CWGEE). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY:There is a lack of consensus among investigators regarding how to best incorporate data from multiple cycles and whether to present odds or risks in the analysis of IVF data. Failure to account for correlated outcomes within individuals and informative cluster size may lead to invalid CIs and biased estimates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION:The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study of subfertile couples conducted at an academic medical center. This cohort was established in 2004 and follows couples seeking treatment for infertility throughout the course of their treatment and pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS:Women aged 18-46 years enrolled in the EARTH Study from 2004 to 2017 who initiated at least one IVF cycle were eligible. Cycle initiation was defined as beginning ovulation induction with the intent to progress through an IVF or ICSI cycle. This analysis included 442 women undergoing 642 cycles who met the study inclusion criteria. We compared the results and interpretations of log-binomial and logistic models restricting to the first cycle, as well as mixed effects models, unweighted GEE models, and CWGEE models including all cycles. This analysis was conducted for two distinct exposures: maternal age at cycle initiation, and maternal preconception urinary concentrations of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) metabolites (previously reported to be associated with a decreased probability of live birth). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE:In general, the CIs were widest for mixed effects models and narrowest for CWGEE models. Further, in models evaluating the sum of urinary concentrations of DEHP metabolites (∑DEHP, available for 91% of women), the point estimates were surprisingly different between the first-cycle and multiple-cycle models. We observed significant associations between maternal age and live birth in all models. However, we observed no associations between ∑DEHP and live birth. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION:This analysis was limited to an example dataset in which the true effect of any exposure is unknown. While this allows us to observe model performance in the context of real data, future analyses should be conducted within simulated datasets under various assumptions to further evaluate the appropriateness of each approach. In addition, we did not address differential loss to follow-up in our statistical approaches. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS:The use of CWGEE models should be more widely considered in the analysis of IVF data with multiple cycles per woman. The CWGEE approach is computationally simple, addresses non-ignorable (informative) cluster size, and is robust against mis-specification of the underlying covariance structure. Among the methods compared in this analysis, CWGEE models generally yielded the narrowest CIs, possibly indicating the most precise estimates. We also stress the importance of estimating risks rather than odds in the analysis of IVF data. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S):The project was funded by Grants (R01ES022955, R01ES009718, and P30ES000002) from the National Institutes of Health. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Project description:The human microbiome has become an area of intense research due to its potential impact on human health. However, the analysis and interpretation of this data have proven to be challenging due to its complexity and high dimensionality. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can process vast amounts of data to uncover informative patterns and relationships within the data, even with limited prior knowledge. Therefore, there has been a rapid growth in the development of software specifically designed for the analysis and interpretation of microbiome data using ML techniques. These software incorporate a wide range of ML algorithms for clustering, classification, regression, or feature selection, to identify microbial patterns and relationships within the data and generate predictive models. This rapid development with a constant need for new developments and integration of new features require efforts into compile, catalog and classify these tools to create infrastructures and services with easy, transparent, and trustable standards. Here we review the state-of-the-art for ML tools applied in human microbiome studies, performed as part of the COST Action ML4Microbiome activities. This scoping review focuses on ML based software and framework resources currently available for the analysis of microbiome data in humans. The aim is to support microbiologists and biomedical scientists to go deeper into specialized resources that integrate ML techniques and facilitate future benchmarking to create standards for the analysis of microbiome data. The software resources are organized based on the type of analysis they were developed for and the ML techniques they implement. A description of each software with examples of usage is provided including comments about pitfalls and lacks in the usage of software based on ML methods in relation to microbiome data that need to be considered by developers and users. This review represents an extensive compilation to date, offering valuable insights and guidance for researchers interested in leveraging ML approaches for microbiome analysis.

Dataset Information

Microbiome Toolbox: methodological approaches to derive and visualize microbiome trajectories.

Motivation

Results

Availability and implementation

Supplementary information

Publications

Microbiome Toolbox: methodological approaches to derive and visualize microbiome trajectories.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets