Dataset Information

Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In recent years, many important advances have been seen in anticoagulation therapy. However, bleeding risk is still a major concern. Factor XI (FXI) inhibition has emerged as a potential advantageous target to minimize this risk.

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence on FXI inhibitors for thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus) until May of 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating FXI inhibitors in thromboprophylaxis versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). For analysis purposes, we considered efficacy (venous thromboembolism [VTE], symptomatic VTE) and safety (major and clinically relevant non-major [CRNM] bleeding events, major bleeding events, blood transfusion necessities, adverse events, major adverse events) outcomes.

Results

Overall, four RCTs were included, with a total of 2269 patients, 372 VTE events, and 50 major or CRNM bleeding events. Regarding efficacy outcomes, FXI inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of VTE events (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.36, 0.69]). Concerning safety outcomes, FXI inhibitors significantly reduced major or CRNM bleeding events (OR 0.41; 95% CI [0.22, 0.75]). It was also associated with a lower percentage of patients needing a blood transfusion, despite not meeting statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI [0.32, 1.48]). Incidence of adverse events and major adverse events were similar between groups.

Conclusion

Factor XI inhibitors showed a significant reduction in the incidence of VTE and bleeding events among patients submitted to major orthopedic surgery.

SUBMITTER: Presume J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9828034 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Presume João J Ferreira Jorge J Ribeiras Regina R Mendes Miguel M

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH 20221005 12

<h4>Background</h4>In recent years, many important advances have been seen in anticoagulation therapy. However, bleeding risk is still a major concern. Factor XI (FXI) inhibition has emerged as a potential advantageous target to minimize this risk.<h4>Objectives</h4>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence on FXI inhibitors for thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, an ...[more]

PMID: 36128769

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImmobilization of the lower limb is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are anticoagulants, which might be used in adult patients with lower-limb immobilization to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and its complications. This is an update of the review first published in 2008.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower-limb immobilization in an ambulatory setting.Search methodsFor this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Specialised Register, CENTRAL, and three trials registers (April 2017).Selection criteriaRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that described thromboprophylaxis by means of LMWH compared with no prophylaxis or placebo in adult patients with lower-limb immobilization. Immobilization was by means of a plaster cast or brace.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.Main resultsWe included eight RCTs that fulfilled our criteria, with a total of 3680 participants. The quality of evidence, according GRADE, varied by outcome and ranged from low to moderate. We found an incidence of DVT ranging from 4.3% to 40% in patients who had a leg injury that had been immobilized in a plaster cast or a brace for at least one week, and who received no prophylaxis, or placebo. This number was significantly lower in patients who received daily subcutaneous injections of LMWH during immobilization, with event rates ranging from 0% to 37% (odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.61; with minimal evidence of heterogeneity: I² = 26%, P = 0.23; seven studies; 1676 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Comparable results were seen in the following groups of participants: patients with below-knee casts, conservatively treated patients (non-operated patients), operated patients, patients with fractures, patients with soft-tissue injuries, and patients with distal or proximal thrombosis. No clear differences were found between the LMWH and control groups for pulmonary embolism (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.47; with no evidence of heterogeneity: I² = 0%, P = 0.56; five studies, 2517 participants; low-quality evidence). The studies also showed less symptomatic VTE in the LMWH groups compared with the control groups (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.76; with minimal evidence of heterogeneity: I² = 16%, P = 0.31; six studies; 2924 participants; low-quality evidence). One death was reported in the included studies, but no deaths due to pulmonary embolism were reported. Complications of major adverse events were rare, with minor bleeding the main adverse events reported.Authors' conclusionsModerate-quality evidence showed that the use of LMWH in outpatients reduced DVT when immobilization of the lower limb was required, when compared with no prophylaxis or placebo. The quality of the evidence was reduced to moderate because of risk of selection and attrition bias in the included studies. Low-quality evidence showed no clear differences in PE between the LMWH and control groups, but less symptomatic VTE in the LMWH groups. The quality of the evidence was downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

Project description:Thromboprophylaxis, as a preventive measure for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), may be beneficial for patients with active cancer and high-risk for thrombosis. The present post hoc analysis include a total of 407 patients enrolled in the Greek Management of Thrombosis study, who received thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin. The objectives of the present analysis were: i) To obtain sufficient evidence for the administration of prophylaxis in patients with active cancer, irrespective of Khorana risk assessment model score; ii) to identify the selection criteria for both dose and duration of tinzaparin; and iii) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tinzaparin administered for CAT prophylaxis. The main tumor types for the patients included in the present study were as follows: Lung (25.1%), pancreatic (14.3%), breast (9.1%), stomach (8.4%), colorectal (7.9%) and ovarian (7.6%). Furthermore, metastatic disease was observed in 69.5% of the patients. High thrombotic burden agents (HTBAs) were administered to 66.3% of the patients, and 17.4% received erythropoietin. A total of 43.7% of the patients exhibited a Khorana score <2. The results of the present study demonstrated that both the presence of metastatic disease and the use of HTBAs seemed to influence oncologists' decisions for the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients with active cancer, regardless of Khorana score. Tinzaparin, in dose expressed in the standard notation for heparins, i.e., anti-Xa factor international units (Anti-Xa IU), was administered at an intermediate dose (InterD; 8,000-12,000 Anti-Xa IU; once daily) to 52.4% of patients, while the remaining patients received a prophylactic dose (ProD; ≤4,500 Anti-Xa IU; once daily). The average duration of thromoprophylaxis was 5 months. Furthermore, a total of 14 (3.4%) thrombotic events and 6 (1.5%) minor bleeding events were recorded. A total of four thrombotic events were observed following an InterD treatment of tinzaparin, while 10 thrombotic events were observed following ProD treatment. The present study also demonstrated that an InterD of tinzaparin was administered more frequently to patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m2, a history of smoking and a history of metastatic disease, along with administration of erythropoietin. InterD tinzaparin treatment was found to be potentially more efficacious and without safety concerns. The present study is a registered clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov code, NCT03292107; registration date, September 25, 2017).

Project description:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of mortality and disability in hospitalized patients, and anticoagulation is an essential therapeutic option. Despite the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants, complications and adverse drug reactions still occur in patients with VTE. Within 5 years, 20% of patients with VTE experience recurrence, and 50% of patients with deep vein thrombosis develop post-thrombotic syndrome. Furthermore, bleeding due to anticoagulants is a side effect that must be addressed. Therefore, safer and more effective anticoagulant strategies with higher patient compliance are urgently needed. Available epidemiological evidence and animal studies have shown that factor XI (FXI) inhibitors can reduce thrombus size and loosen the thrombus structure with a relatively low risk of bleeding, suggesting that FXI has an important role in thrombus stabilization and is a safer target for anticoagulation. Recent clinical trial data have also shown that FXI inhibitors are as effective as enoxaparin and apixaban in preventing VTE, but with a significantly lower incidence of bleeding. Furthermore, FXI inhibitors can be administered daily or monthly; therefore, the monitoring interval can be longer. Additionally, FXI inhibitors can prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time without affecting prothrombin time, which is an easy and common test used in clinical testing, providing a cost-effective monitoring routine for patients. Consequently, the inhibition of FXI may be an effective strategy for the prevention and treatment of VTE. Enormous progress has been made in the research strategies for FXI inhibitors, with abelacimab already in phase III clinical trials and most other inhibitors in phase I or II trials. In this review, we discuss the challenges of VTE therapy, briefly describe the structure and function of FXI, summarize the latest FXI/activated FXI (FXIa) inhibitor strategies, and summarize the latest developments in clinical trials of FXI/FXIa inhibitors.

Dataset Information

Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets