Dataset Information

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare effectiveness of different treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were scheduled for cardioversion (CV) or ablation (CA) presenting with left atrium appendage (LAA) thrombus despite chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 2014-2019 medical records of patients scheduled for CV or CA of AF who were diagnosed with LAA thrombus despite optimal OAC and had a follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). Changes in treatment were divided into the following groups: switch to a drug with different mechanism of action, switch to a drug with similar mechanism of action, initiation of combination therapy, or deliberate no change in treatment. Patients with contraindications to non-vitamin K antagonists were excluded from the analysis.

Results

We analyzed data of 129 patients comprising 181 cycles of treatment. The overall effectiveness of LAA thrombus dissolution was 51.9% regardless of the number of cycles and 42.6% for the first cycle of treatment. Any change of treatment was more effective than deliberate no change-OR 2.97 [95% CI: 1.07-8.25], P = 0.031, but no particular strategy seemed to be more effective than the other. Left atrium area (OR 0.908 [95% CI: 0.842-0.979]) and number of treatment cycles (OR 0.457 [95% CI: 0.239-0.872]) were both adversely related to thrombus resolution. There was one ischemic and three bleeding adverse events during the treatment.

Conclusion

LAA thrombus resolution in patients already on OAC may require a change of previous OAC treatment but the overall effectiveness of dissolution seems to be about 50%.

SUBMITTER: Kolakowski K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9834361 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter.

Kołakowski Karol K Farkowski Michał M MM Pytkowski Mariusz M Gardziejczyk Piotr P Kowalik Ilona I Dąbrowski Rafał R Firek Bohdan B Jaworski Krzysztof K Klisiewicz Anna A Maciąg Aleksander A

Cardiovascular drugs and therapy 20211020 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare effectiveness of different treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were scheduled for cardioversion (CV) or ablation (CA) presenting with left atrium appendage (LAA) thrombus despite chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC).<h4>Methods</h4>This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 2014-2019 medical records of patients scheduled for CV or CA of AF who were diagnosed with LAA thrombus despite optimal OAC and had a follow-up transesophageal echocar ...[more]

PMID: 34669102

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThis study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) compared to standard stroke prevention care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective.Methods and resultsWe used a combined decision tree and cohort Markov model to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon with LAAO compared to standard of care where the treatment effect is based on a recent meta-analysis. According to our analysis, LAAO gives more QALYs than standard of care (7.11 vs. 6.12). Furthermore, LAAO treatment is related to the first-year cost of 14 984 Euro (EUR) and higher average healthcare costs over the lifetime by about 4010 EUR, which gives an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of LAAO vs. standard of care at 4047 EUR per gained QALY. From a public sector perspective, LAAO reduces average costs due to substantial reductions in long-term care and, thus, implies that LAAO is dominant from a public sector perspective (lower average costs and better health outcomes).ConclusionFrom both Swedish healthcare and public sector perspectives, LAAO can be considered cost-effective compared to standard of care for individuals with AF and contraindication to OAC. However, these results must be confirmed in health economic evaluations alongside the ongoing randomized clinical trials.Key questionIs left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) cost-effective for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC) compared to the standard of care from a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective?Key findingLAAO is associated with lower cost than the standard of care from a public sector perspective and an incremental cost of 4010 Euro from a healthcare perspective. Furthermore, LAAO is related to better health outcomes than the standard of care.Take home messageTreatment with LAAO among individuals with AF and contraindication to OAC can be considered as cost-effective compared to the standard of care from a Swedish healthcare and public sector perspective.

Dataset Information

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets