Project description:Background and aimsSeveral studies were conducted to explore the prognostic significance of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, contradictory results across most reports were documented. To this end, we present a systematic review that aims to summarize the prognostic significance of PLR in patients with HCC.ResultsA total of 10 studies involving a total of 2,315 patients were identified. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) of each included study was greater than or equal to 5. The results indicated that high PLR was significantly associated with a worse OS when compared to the low PLR (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.23-2.08, p = 0.0005; I2 = 88%, p < 0.00001). Similar results were detected in the subgroup analysis of the analysis model, cut-off value, ethnicity, sample size and therapy. However, no obvious correlation between the PLR and DFS/RFS in patients with HCC was observed (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.87-1.67, p = 0.26; I2 = 61%, p = 0.07).Materials and methodsA complete literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase database was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies focusing on the role of PLR on the prognosis in HCC were all deemed as "suitable" for our scope. The endpoints determined were: the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the progress free survival (PFS).ConclusionsThe study revealed that high PLR is an unfavorable predictor of OS in patients with HCC, and high PLR is a promising prognostic biomarker for HCC, especially for patients in Asia.
Project description:Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been approved as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study was designed to assess the clinical impact of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in uHCC patients. A total of 48 uHCC patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were identified, including first-line, second-line, third-line, and later-line settings. In these patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months, including 5.0 months for the first-line treatment, not reached for the second-line treatment, and 2.5 months for the third line and later line treatment. The objective response rate and disease control rate to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were 27.1% and 68.8%, respectively. The severity of most adverse events was predominantly grade 1-2, and most patients tolerated the toxicities. The ratios of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) were used to predict PFS in these patients. The optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR were 3 and 230, and NLR and PLR were independent prognostic factors for superior PFS in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in uHCC patients in clinical practice and demonstrates the prognostic role of NLR and PLR for PFS in these patients.
Project description:ObjectivesRecent studies suggest that an elevated preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may be considered a poor prognostic biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of PLR in patients with CRC.MethodsWe enrolled 1314 patients who underwent surgery for CRC between 2005 and 2011. Preoperative PLR level was stratified into quintiles for Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models.ResultsHigher PLR quintiles were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that PLR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.034). Patients in PLR quintile 5 had lower overall survival than in quintile 1 (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.701, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.267-2.282, P < 0.001). Although patients in PLR quintile 5 had significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) than in quintile 1 (HR = 1.522, 95% CI: 1.114-2.080, P = 0.008), this association was not significant after multivariable adjustment (P = 0.075). In the subgroup analysis, PLR remained an independent factor in terms of advanced tumor stage (III, IV), male sex, carcinoembryonic antigen (≤ 5 ng/ml), age (> 65 years) and body mass index (≤ 25) (P < 0.05 for all measurements). The results remained unchanged when the PLR was analyzed as a dichotomous variable by applying different cut-off values of 150, 185, 220.ConclusionsElevated preoperative PLR was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with CRC. The utility of PLR may help to improve prognostic predictors.
Project description:BackgroundPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been used to predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the prognostic value of PLR in patients with HCC.MethodsWe systematically retrieved relevant literature published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to November 20, 2021. The primary outcomes were the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), and secondary study outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS). All statistical analyses were conducted by Review Manager 5.4.1 and STATA 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 21 studies comprising 8,779 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results suggested that a high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18-1.52, P<0.00001; I2=59%, P=0.0005), RFS or DFS (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13-1.63, P=0.001; I2=69%, P=0.002), and PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.09-2.22, P=0.02; I2=73%, P=0.02). The subgroup analysis for OS showed, when the PLR cutoff value was greater than 150, the heterogeneity decreased to 0 (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.33-1.68, P<0.00001; I2=0%, P=0.56); when the HBsAg positive population was increased to 100%, the heterogeneity decreased to 0 (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22-1.73, P<0.0001; I2=0%, P=0.45); compared with other regions in the world, it was more significant in China (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.62, P<0.00001; I2=52%, P=0.01). In addition, scatter plot showed that the HR was negatively correlated with the proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that PLR is a negative correlation prognostic biomarker for HCC, high PLR values indicate poor OS, RFS, DFS and PFS, especially in hepatitis B virus (HBV) related patients.
Project description:Background:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks fifth among malignancies globally. Previous studies have shown that systemic inflammatory response, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are associated with poor prognosis of various types of cancer. Materials and methods:Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed using an internal cooling electrode with a 2- or 3-cm exposed tip. The LMR was calculated as the ratio of lymphocytes to monocytes. In order to explore the influence of pretreatment with PLR and LMR on survival of HCC patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and RFA, 204 cases with HCC which accepted RFA and TACE were retrospectively analyzed and assigned into 2 groups based on optimal cutoff values for LMR (low: ?2.13 or high: >2.13) and PLR (low: ?95.65 or high: >95.65). Results:Patients with a lower PLR had a longer overall survival (OS) compared to those with a higher PLR (median OS, 20 versus 13 months), and patients with a higher LMR had a longer OS than those with a lower LMR (OS, 22 versus 10 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for multiple prognostic factors and identified PLR and LMR as prognostic factors for OS of HCC cases. Conclusion:We conclude that PLR and LMR, whose detection is generally available and affordable, may be novel noninvasive circulating markers to potentially assist doctors assess the prognosis of patients.
Project description:The prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in urologic cancer does not reach a consensus. Herein, we performed the meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of PLR in patients with urologic cancer. A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted to estimate the association between PLR and prognosis. A total of 20 articles comprising 6079 patients were included in this study. The pooled results showed that a high PLR was significantly associated with worse prognosis of overall survival (OS) in urologic cancer [HR=1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.37-1.99, P<0.01]. The result also indicated that an elevated PLR was significantly associated with poor OS in renal cancer (HR=1.88, 95% CI=1.39-2.55, P<0.01). In addition, the significant association between poor OS and elevated PLR in renal cancer was consistent regardless of treatment, cut-off value, sample size and study quality. Our result also indicated that an elevated PLR predicted shorter OS (HR=1.78, 95% CI=1.38-2.30, P<0.01) and cancer-specific survival (HR=2.02, 95% CI=1.24-3.29, P<0.01) in prostate cancer. In conclusion, an elevated PLR was a predictive indicator of poor survival in renal cancer and prostate cancer.
Project description:Background: The prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and the combined NLR-PLR score in patients with stage IV gastric carcinoma (GC) has not yet been clarified. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential association of NLR, PLR, and NLR-PLR score with the prognosis of patients with stage IV GC. Methods: This retrospective study included 466 patients with GC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. High NLR and high PLR were defined using the median values as the cutoff values. We then combined the NLR and PLR value and generated the NLR-PLR score as a new biomarker. Patients were divided into three groups according to their NLR-PLR score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare survival outcomes. Results: Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.5 months (range, 0.7-96.8 months) and 6.7 months (range, 0.5-30.4 months), respectively. The NLR, PLR, and the NLR-PLR scores were correlated with clinical outcomes such as OS and PFS. Median OS for patients with NLR-PLR scores of 0, 1, and 2 was 22.5, 15.7, and 11.2 months, respectively. Median PFS for patients with these NLR-PLR scores of 0, 1, and 2 was 7.8, 7.1, and 5.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001). High NLR-PLR scores predicted poor survival in patients with stage IV GC (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings provide scientific evidence to support that the NLR-PLR score may be able to independently predict survival outcomes in patients with stage IV GC.
Project description:BackgroundNLR family CARD domain containing 5 (NLRC5) is involved the initiation and progression of several cancers. However, its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear. This study aimed to explore the expression, clinical significance, and regulated gene sets of NLRC5 in HCC.MethodsData related to NLRC5 was extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and analyzed. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was conducted to verify the NLRC5 mRNA expression in HCC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and western blot were performed to detect the NLRC5 protein level in HCC. The clinical significance of NLRC5 was investigated after separating patients into NLRC5-positive and NLRC5-negative groups based on the IHC results. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to detect gene sets regulated by NLRC5 in HCC.ResultsIncreased NLRC5 mRNA and protein expression were found in HCC tissues compared to paracancerous tissues. Moreover, enhanced NLRC5 protein expression was associated with a higher presence rate of cirrhosis, a higher TNM stage, and a shorter 3-year overall survival (OS) of HCC participants. Finally, gene sets related to cancer metastasis were up-regulated in the NLRC5 high phenotype.ConclusionsNLRC5 is a potential marker for the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of HCC.
Project description:Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization and is associated with considerable mortality, for which clinicians are seeking useful and easily obtained biomarkers for prognostic evaluation. This study aimed to determine the potential role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic makers for hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD.We included 303 patients with AECOPD in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics, NLR, PLR, and serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and other data were collected. Relationships between NLR/PLR and CRP were evaluated by Pearson's correlation test. Receiver operating characteristics curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the ability of NLR and PLR to predict hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD.Mean levels of NLR and PLR of all patients with AECOPD were 7.92±8.79 and 207.21±148.47, respectively. NLR levels correlated with serum CRP levels (r=0.281, P<0.05). The overall hospital mortality rate was 12.21% (37/303). Levels of NLR and PLR were signifi-cantly higher among non-survivors compared to survivors of AECOPD (both P<0.05). At a cut-off value of 6.24, the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR in predicting hospital mortality were 81.08% and 69.17%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.803. At a cut-off of 182.68, the corresponding sensitivity, specificity and AUC of PLR were 64.86%, 58.27%, and 0.639. The combination of NLR, PLR, and CRP increased the prognostic sensitivity.NLR and PLR levels were increased in non-survivor patients with AECOPD, and the NLR may be simple and useful prognostic marker for hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD. More studies should be carried out to confirm our findings.
Project description:Background: In recent years, several studies have investigated the relationship between platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of patients with laryngeal cancer, but the results remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment PLR in patients with laryngeal cancer. Methods: Up to July 2023, we searched PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases to collect relevant articles evaluating the relationship between PLR and the prognosis of laryngeal cancer. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effect-model. Results: A total of 14 included studies involving 3220 patients with laryngeal cancer were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer overall survival (HR = 2.21, 95% CI, 1.67 - 2.93, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.76-3.66, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.87, 95% CI,1.45 - 2.42, p < 0.001), and disease-free survival (HR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.08-1.98, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis further confirmed that pretreatment PLR was an independent predictor of OS in laryngeal cancer patients. Conclusion: Higher pretreatment PLR is strongly related to poor prognosis of laryngeal cancer patients. This indicates that PLR has the potential to serve as a valuable biomarker for predicting the prognosis of laryngeal cancer. However, further validations in large prospective cohorts are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and reliability.