Risky choice: Probability weighting explains independence axiom violations in monkeys.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Expected Utility Theory (EUT) provides axioms for maximizing utility in risky choice. The Independence Axiom (IA) is its most demanding axiom: preferences between two options should not change when altering both options equally by mixing them with a common gamble. We tested common consequence (CC) and common ratio (CR) violations of the IA over several months in thousands of stochastic choices using a large variety of binary option sets. Three monkeys showed consistently few outright Preference Reversals (8%) but substantial graded Preference Changes (46%) between the initial preferred gamble and the corresponding altered gamble. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) indicated that gamble probabilities predicted most Preference Changes in CC (72%) and CR (88%) tests. The
SUBMITTER: Ferrari-Toniolo S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9840594 | biostudies-literature | 2022
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA