Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
This study aimed to identify commonly used classification systems by cleft providers around the world, including the perceived indications and limitations of each system.Design
A cross-sectional survey.Participants
A total of 197 registrants from three international cleft/craniofacial meetings.Interventions
Participants were sent a web-based questionnaire concerning cleft classification systems.Main outcome measures
Frequency of commonly used classification systems, their perceived indications and limitations.Results
A total of 197 respondents from 166 different centers completed the questionnaire. Healthcare professionals from all disciplines responded, with the most frequent respondents being plastic surgeons (38.1%), maxillofacia
SUBMITTER: Houkes R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9843539 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature