Dataset Information

Population pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual combination in Chinese healthy volunteers and patients with opioid use disorder: Model-based dose optimization.

ABSTRACT: The sublingual combination of buprenorphine (BUP) and naloxone (NLX) is a new treatment option for opioid use disorder (OUD) and is effective in preventing drug abuse. This study aimed to explore rational dosing regimen for OUD patients in China via a model-based dose optimization approach. BUP, norbuprenorphine (norBUP), and NLX plasma concentrations of 34 healthy volunteers and 12 OUD subjects after single or repeated dosing were included. A parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model with transit compartments for absorption was implemented to describe the pharmacokinetic profile of BUP-norBUP. In addition, NLX concentrations were well captured by a one-compartment popPK model. Covariate analysis showed that every additional swallow after the administration within the observed range (0-12) resulted in a 3.5% reduction in BUP bioavailability. This provides a possible reason for the less-than-dose proportionality of BUP. There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics between BUP or NLX in healthy volunteers and OUD subjects. Ethnic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the dose-normalized peak concentration and area-under-the-curve of BUP in Chinese were about half of Puerto Ricans, which was consistent with a higher clearance observed in Chinese (166 L/h vs. 270 L/h ). Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulations showed that an 8 mg three-times daily dose was the optimized regimen for Chinese OUD subjects. This regimen ensured that opioid receptor occupancy remained at a maximum (70%) in more than 95% of subjects, at the same time, with NLX plasma concentrations below the withdrawal reaction threshold (4.6 ng/mL ).

SUBMITTER: Gu M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9893638 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Population pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual combination in Chinese healthy volunteers and patients with opioid use disorder: Model-based dose optimization.

Gu Meng M Li Anning A Mak Wenyao W Dong Fang F Xu Nuo N Zhang Jingye J Shi Yufei Y Zheng Nan N Tang Zhijia Z He Qingfeng Q Ruan Canjun C Guo Wei W Xiang Xiaoqiang X Wang Chuanyue C Han Bing B Zhu Xiao X

Frontiers in pharmacology 20230119

The sublingual combination of buprenorphine (BUP) and naloxone (NLX) is a new treatment option for opioid use disorder (OUD) and is effective in preventing drug abuse. This study aimed to explore rational dosing regimen for OUD patients in China <i>via</i> a model-based dose optimization approach. BUP, norbuprenorphine (norBUP), and NLX plasma concentrations of 34 healthy volunteers and 12 OUD subjects after single or repeated dosing were included. A parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetics ...[more]

PMID: 36744255

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceBuprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder may be improved by sustained-release formulations.ObjectiveTo determine whether treatment involving novel weekly and monthly subcutaneous (SC) buprenorphine depot formulations is noninferior to a daily sublingual (SL) combination of buprenorphine hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride in the treatment of opioid use disorder.Design, setting, and participantsThis outpatient, double-blind, double-dummy randomized clinical trial was conducted at 35 sites in the United States from December 29, 2015, through October 19, 2016. Participants were treatment-seeking adults with moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder.InterventionsRandomization to daily SL placebo and weekly (first 12 weeks; phase 1) and monthly (last 12 weeks; phase 2) SC buprenorphine (SC-BPN group) or to daily SL buprenorphine with naloxone (24 weeks) with matched weekly and monthly SC placebo injections (SL-BPN/NX group).Main outcomes and measuresPrimary end points tested for noninferiority were response rate (10% margin) and the mean proportion of opioid-negative urine samples for 24 weeks (11% margin). Responder status was defined as having no evidence of illicit opioid use for at least 8 of 10 prespecified points during weeks 9 to 24, with 2 of these at week 12 and during month 6 (weeks 21-24). The mean proportion of samples with no evidence of illicit opioid use (weeks 4-24) evaluated by a cumulative distribution function (CDF) was an a priori secondary outcome with planned superiority testing if the response rate demonstrated noninferiority.ResultsA total of 428 participants (263 men [61.4%] and 165 women [38.6%]; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.0] years) were randomized to the SL-BPN/NX group (n = 215) or the SC-BPN group (n = 213). The response rates were 31 of 215 (14.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 37 of 213 (17.4%) for the SC-BPN group, a 3.0% difference (95% CI, -4.0% to 9.9%; P < .001). The proportion of opioid-negative urine samples was 1099 of 3870 (28.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 1347 of 3834 (35.1%) for the SC-BPN group, a 6.7% difference (95% CI, -0.1% to 13.6%; P < .001). The CDF for the SC-BPN group (26.7%) was statistically superior to the CDF for the SL-BPN/NX group (0; P = .004). Injection site adverse events (none severe) occurred in 48 participants (22.3%) in the SL-BPN/NX group and 40 (18.8%) in the SC-BPN group.Conclusions and relevanceCompared with SL buprenorphine, depot buprenorphine did not result in an inferior likelihood of being a responder or having urine test results negative for opioids and produced superior results on the CDF of no illicit opioid use. These data suggest that depot buprenorphine is efficacious and may have advantages.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02651584.

Project description:ImportanceExtended-release buprenorphine (XRB), a monthly injectable long-acting opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, has not been studied for use in corrections facilities.ObjectiveTo compare treatment retention following release from jail among adults receiving daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (SLB) vs those receiving XRB.Design, setting, and participantsThis open-label, randomized comparative effectiveness study included 52 incarcerated adults in New York City observed for 8 weeks postrelease between June 2019 and May 2020. Participants were soon-to-be-released volunteers from 1 men's and 1 women's jail facility who had OUDs already treated with SLB. Follow-up treatment was received at a primary care clinic in Manhattan. Data were analyzed between June 2020 and December 2020.InterventionsXRB treatment was offered prior to release and continued monthly through 8 weeks after release. SLB participants continued to receive daily directly observed in-jail SLB administration, were provided a 7-day SLB supply at jail release, and followed up at a designated clinic (or other preferred clinics).Main outcomes and measuresBuprenorphine treatment retention at 8 weeks postrelease.ResultsA total of 52 participants were randomized 1:1 to XRB (26 participants) and SLB (26 participants). Participants had a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (10.0) years; 45 participants (87%) were men; and 40 (77%) primarily used heroin prior to incarceration. Most participants (30 [58%]) reported prior buprenorphine use; 18 (35%) reported active community buprenorphine treatment prior to jail admission. Twenty-one of 26 assigned to XRB received 1 or more XRB injection prior to release; 3 initiated XRB postrelease; and 2 did not receive XRB. Patients in the XRB arm had fewer jail medical visits compared with daily SLB medication administration (mean [SD] visits per day: XRB, 0.11 [0.03] vs SLB, 1.06 [0.08]). Community buprenorphine treatment retention at week 8 postrelease was 18 participants in the XRB group (69.2%) vs 9 in the SLB group (34.6%), and rates of opioid-negative urine tests were 72 of 130 tests in the XRB group (55.3%) and 50 of 130 tests in the SLB group (38.4%). There were no differences in rates of serious adverse events, no overdoses, and no deaths.Conclusions and relevanceXRB was acceptable among patients currently receiving SLB, and patients had fewer in-jail clinic visits and increased community buprenorphine treatment retention when compared with standard daily SLB treatment. These results support wider use and further study of XRB as correctional and reentry OUD treatment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03604159.

Project description:BackgroundTwo phase I studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine, its metabolite norbuprenorphine, and naloxone following administration of buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets in Chinese participants.MethodsIn the first phase I, open-label, single ascending-dose (SAD) study, 82 opioid-naïve volunteers received a single buprenorphine/naloxone dose ranging from 2 mg/0.5 mg to 24 mg/6 mg while under naltrexone block. In a second phase I, open-label, multiple ascending-dose (MAD) study, 27 patients with opioid dependence in withdrawal received buprenorphine/naloxone doses of either 16 mg/4 mg or 24 mg/6 mg for 9 consecutive days. Serial blood samples were collected after a single dose (SAD study) and at steady-state (MAD study). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Safety assessments included adverse events monitoring and laboratory tests.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic profiles of buprenorphine and naloxone were consistent between single- and multiple-dose studies. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were reached early for buprenorphine (0.75-1.0 h) and naloxone (0.5 h), supporting rapid absorption. In the SAD study, increases in plasma exposures to buprenorphine and naloxone were less than dose proportional, in line with previous observations in Western populations. Buprenorphine-to-naloxone ratios for Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were constant over the dose range investigated and also consistent with Western populations data. Steady state was reached within 7 days of daily dosing, with slight accumulation over repeated doses. No serious adverse events were observed.ConclusionsThe present data suggest that buprenorphine/naloxone pharmacokinetic profiles in Chinese participants are consistent, overall, with those in Western populations, supporting no differences in dosing.Clinical trial registrationThe protocols were registered on the official website of the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA): http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ ; Registration numbers CTR20132963 (RB-CN-10-0012), CTR20140153 (RB-CN-10-0015).

Dataset Information

Population pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual combination in Chinese healthy volunteers and patients with opioid use disorder: Model-based dose optimization.

Publications

Population pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual combination in Chinese healthy volunteers and patients with opioid use disorder: Model-based dose optimization.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets