Dataset Information

Feasibility study of high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risks in individuals with acute spinal cord injury.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Individuals ageing with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience an accelerated trajectory of diseases and disorders, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, that resemble those experienced with ageing alone. Currently, an evidence-based approach toward managing this problem does not exist and therefore the purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a high-intensity exercise intervention in individuals with acute (<6 months postinjury) SCI to improve cardiometabolic health.

Methods and analysis

We will conduct a single-centre, two parallel-arm, randomised feasibility study of a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention in individuals with acute SCI. We will enrol 40 individuals (20 intervention, 20 control) with acute SCI attending inpatient rehabilitation at Salisbury District Hospital. Participants will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (HIIT) or control group for 18 weeks. Both groups will participate in standard care throughout the duration of the study. The HIIT group only will also perform supervised HIIT exercise on an arm cycle ergometer three times per week. Over the course of the intervention, most participants will be discharged from the hospital, and at this time, an arm cycle ergometer will be installed in their home and the intervention will transition into outpatient care. We will assess cardiorespiratory fitness, glycaemic control, lipid profile and body habitus as well as qualitative assessments of acceptability at weeks 0, 9 and 18 with the primary outcome being the feasibility of a full Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT).

Ethics and dissemination

This study will inform a longer-term, definitive, multicentre RCT to establish the impact of this exercise intervention in maintaining the cardiometabolic health of patients during the acute phase following SCI. Results will be disseminated in different formats including peer-reviewed journal articles, conference presentations and internet media, to a wide audience including clinicians, researchers and individuals with SCI.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN57514022.

SUBMITTER: Maher JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9900054 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Feasibility study of high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risks in individuals with acute spinal cord injury.

Maher Jennifer L JL Whitmarsh Catherine C Smith Paula P Taylor Hazel H Fard Aram A Bilzon James J

BMJ open 20230203 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Individuals ageing with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience an accelerated trajectory of diseases and disorders, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, that resemble those experienced with ageing alone. Currently, an evidence-based approach toward managing this problem does not exist and therefore the purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a high-intensity exercise intervention in individuals with acute (<6 months postinjury) SCI to improve ...[more]

PMID: 36737096

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe number of exercise trials examining cardiometabolic outcomes in spinal cord injury (SCI) is low, and prescribed exercise is often inconvenient for individuals with SCI to perform within their community. Individuals with SCI experience a myriad of barriers to exercise participation, which can include a lack of time, accessible or usable equipment and facilities, and transportation. Thus, it is imperative to identify effective modes of exercise that provide the greatest overall health benefits but do not require a significant time commitment. Low-volume high intensity interval training (HIIT) has demonstrated the same improvements in cardiometabolic health as moderate intensity exercise training (MIT), despite only requiring 20% of the total time commitment in adults without disabilities and more recently in individuals with SCI.ObjectivesThe primary purpose of this study is to integrate a 16 week home-based telehealth HIIT arm crank exercise training program in individuals with SCI and assess changes in cardiometabolic health.MethodsMen and women between the ages of 19 and 60 with a confirmed diagnosis of SCI between C7 and T12 will be recruited for this study. Participants will be randomized to 16 weeks of telehealth HIIT exercise two days per week or a no-exercise control group. Aerobic capacity, muscular strength, blood lipids, glucose tolerance, resting energy expenditure, blood pressure, and body composition will be assessed at baseline and 16 weeks post-training.DiscussionInactivity associated with SCI leads to chronic cardiometabolic health conditions. The majority of exercise interventions to date show that exercise is capable of increasing physical function, aerobic capacity, and muscle mass, and strength. Additionally, we have recently shown the ability of HIIT to improve blood lipid and glucose concentrations. Advances in telehealth exercise approaches have improved the capability to prescribe home-based exercise programs. Therefore, we hypothesize that the utilization of a home-based telehealth HIIT program will improve cardiometabolic health markers, yield high adherence (> 75%), and will be more enjoyable in individuals with SCI.Trial registrationTelehealth High-Intensity Interval Exercise and Cardiometabolic Health in Spinal Cord Injury NCT04940598.

Project description:AimThe aim was to assess safety and feasibility of Hybrid High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) leg cycling and arm ski ergometer in people with Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI).MethodEight outpatients (mean age 42.8 years; 7 men) with stable SCI paraplegia (mean 14.5 years since injury) participated in hybrid HIIT (90% peak watts; 4 × 4-min intervals), three times a week (over 8 weeks). Primary outcomes were Adverse Events (AE), participant acceptability, shoulder pain, training intensity (% peak watts), and attendance. Secondary outcomes were effect on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during FES hybrid poling, mean watts, self-reported leisure time physical activity, quality of life, and fatigue.ResultsNo serious AE occurred; acceptability with the training modality was high, while shoulder pain increased by 9% (SD 95.2). During training, 50% of the participants reached > 90% peak watts during the intervals, three with the legs (FES cycle) and one with the arms (Ski-Erg). Overall, mean training intensity (% peak watts) was 92% (SD 18.9) for legs and 82% (SD 10.3) for arms. Proportion of fulfilled training minutes was 82% (range 36-100%); one participant dropped out after 6 weeks due to back pain. Mean VO2peak increased by 17% (SD 17.5). Participants reported increased leisure time physical activity and health-related quality of life, besides reduced fatigue.ConclusionHybrid HIIT was safe for people with SCI paraplegia. The majority of the criteria for feasibility were met with acceptable attendance rate, limited drop out, participants enjoyed training, and increased VO2peak and mean watts. However, the intensity of 90% peak watts was reached by < 60% of the participants despite high RPE ratings during training. The method of measuring and calculating intensity needs to be studied further before a study using this HIIT protocol is undertaken.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov , NCT04211311 , registered 12 December 2019 retrospectively registered.

Project description:BackgroundPoststroke guidelines recommend moderate-intensity, continuous aerobic training (MCT) to improve aerobic capacity and mobility after stroke. High-intensity interval training (HIT) has been shown to be more effective than MCT among healthy adults and people with heart disease. However, HIT and MCT have not been compared previously among people with stroke.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and justification for a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing HIT and MCT in people with chronic stroke.DesignA preliminary RCT was conducted.SettingThe study was conducted in a cardiovascular stress laboratory and a rehabilitation research laboratory.PatientsAmbulatory people at least 6 months poststroke participated.InterventionBoth groups trained 25 minutes, 3 times per week, for 4 weeks. The HIT strategy involved 30-second bursts at maximum-tolerated treadmill speed alternated with 30- to 60-second rest periods. The MCT strategy involved continuous treadmill walking at 45% to 50% of heart rate reserve.MeasurementsMeasurements included recruitment and attendance statistics, qualitative HIT acceptability, adverse events, and the following blinded outcome variables: peak oxygen uptake, ventilatory threshold, metabolic cost of gait, fractional utilization, fastest treadmill speed, 10-Meter Walk Test, and Six-Minute Walk Test.ResultsDuring the 8-month recruitment period, 26 participants consented to participate. Eighteen participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the HIT group (n=13) or the MCT group (n=5). Eleven out of the 13 HIT group participants attended all sessions. Participants reported that HIT was acceptable and no serious adverse events occurred. Standardized effect size estimates between groups were moderate to very large for most outcome measures. Only 30% of treadmill speed gains in the HIT group translated into overground gait speed improvement.LimitationsThe study was not designed to definitively test safety or efficacy.ConclusionsAlthough further protocol optimization is needed to improve overground translation of treadmill gains, a definitive RCT comparing HIT and MCT appears to be feasible and warranted.

Project description:Ten healthy male participants were recruited and successfully completed all preliminary testing and the two exercise bouts (Figure 1A). This randomized crossover design permitted signaling responses to workload- and duration-matched HIIT and MICT exercise to be mapped and interrogated within the same participant. Baseline whole-body anthropometric and blood glucose and lipid measurements confirmed these participants (age 25.4 ± 3.2 y; BMI 23.5 ± 1.6 kg/m2) were metabolically healthy, and maximal exercise capacity testing confirmed they were recreationally active but relatively untrained (relative V̇O2 peak 37.9 ± 5.2) in line with our recruitment strategy to maximize detection of skeletal muscle signaling responses to exercise (Figure 1B). Peak power output (Wpeak; 207.5 ± 40.3 W) was used to prescribe the relative work-matched intensities for HIIT and MICT. Lean mass from the DXA scan and resting metabolic rate (Figure 1B) were used to prescribe a standardized meal for each participant to consume prior to each exercise trial day. Following consumption of a standardized dinner meal the night before the HIIT or MICT exercise trial, blood and skeletal muscle biopsy samples were collected in the fasted state at baseline and at 5 min and 10 min of each respective exercise intensity. Participants completing the acute bout of HIIT, which consisted of 10 min total of 1-min ‘on’ intervals at 85 ± 0.1% of individual Wpeak (176 ± 34 W) and 1-min ‘off’ intervals at 50 W, displayed increased plasma lactate concentrations at 5 and 10 min of exercise relative to pre-exercise baseline (Figure 1C; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively; main effect of time P < 0.0001) and no changes in plasma glucose (Figure 1D). In response to total work- and duration-matched acute bout of MICT at 55 ± 2% individual Wpeak (113 ± 17 W), participants displayed increased plasma lactate concentrations at 5 and 10 min of exercise versus baseline (Figure 1C; P < 0.001; main effect of time P < 0.0001) and no changes in plasma glucose (Figure 1D), with a main effect of higher plasma lactate levels in response to HIIT (Figure 1C; P < 0.05). To map the signaling networks regulated by HIIT and MICT, proteins from each skeletal muscle biopsy sample were extracted, digested to peptides with trypsin, isobarically labelled prior to phosphopeptide enrichment, fractionation and LC-MS/MS phosphoproteomic analysis (Figure 2A).

Project description:IntroductionThe prevalence of cardiometabolic disease following spinal cord injury is known to be high. However, it is unknown whether engaging in high-intensity exercise, which is advocated by recent guidelines, is beneficial or feasible for these individuals.ObjectiveTo assess the effects of high-intensity, whole-body exercise on the prevalence of cardiometabolic disease in individuals with spinal cord injury.DesignCombination of a randomized controlled trial and an open label intervention study of functional electrical stimulation legs plus arms rowing.SettingOutpatient academic rehabilitation hospital.ParticipantsForty individuals with spinal cord injury, with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairments scales A-D and neurological levels of injury C1-T12.InterventionSix months of high-intensity, hybrid-functional electrical stimulation rowing.Main outcome measuresChange in VO2max , serum lipids, and insulin resistance, prevalence of cardiometabolic disease.ResultsIndividuals averaged 42.1 ± 22.0 minutes of hybrid-functional electrical stimulation rowing a week over an average of 1.69 sessions per week over the 6 months of intervention. This amounted to an average of 170.9 ± 100 km rowed, at a mean heart rate of 82.7% of individualized maximum. Only one of 40 individuals met current exercise guidelines for the full 6 months. VO2max increased significantly (P < .001), yet prevalence of cardiometabolic disease did not change significantly (decrease from 22.5% to 20%, P = .70). Hemoglobin A1c did decrease significantly over this time (P = .01), although serum lipids and fasting glucose/insulin levels were unchanged. In exploratory subanalyses assessing individuals injured ≤12 months, those with more chronic injuries decreased their triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (P = .04), a marker of cardiac mortality. Stratifying by neurological level of injury, individuals with paraplegia had worsened low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level (P = .02) and total cholesterol-to-HDL ratio (P = .04) over the 6-month intervention.ConclusionsSustained high-intensity exercise with hybrid functional electrical stimulation rowing does not decrease the prevalence of cardiometabolic disease after spinal cord injury.

Project description:Cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases are leading causes of death worldwide. Exercise favorably affects this problem, however only few invest (enough) time to favorably influence cardiometabolic risk-factors and cardiac morphology/performance. Time-effective, high-intensity, low-volume exercise protocols might increase people's commitment to exercise. To date, most research has focused on high-intensity interval training (HIIT), the endurance type of HIT, while corresponding HIT-resistance training protocols (HIT-RT) are rarely evaluated. In this study we compared the effect of HIIT vs. HIT-RT, predominately on cardiometabolic and cardiac parameters in untrained, overweight-obese, middle-aged men. Eligible, untrained men aged 30-50 years old in full-time employment were extracted from two joint exercise studies that randomly assigned participants to a HIIT, HIT-RT or corresponding control group. HIIT predominately consisted of interval training 90 s-12 min, (2-4 sessions/week), HIT-RT (2-3 sessions/week) was applied as a single set resistance training to muscular failure. Core intervention length of both protocols was 16 weeks. Main inclusion criteria were overweight-obese status (BMI 25-35 kg/m2) and full employment (occupational working time: ≥38.5 h/week). Primary study-endpoint was the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) Z-Score, secondary study-endpoints were ventricular stroke volume index (SVI) and myocardial mass index (MMI) as determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Intention to treat (ITT) principle was applied to analyze the summarized data set. Twenty-seven eligible men of the HIT-RT and 30 men of the HIIT group were included in the ITT. Both interventions significantly (p < 0.001) improve the MetS Z-Score, however the effect of HIIT was superior (p = 0.049). In parallel, HIT-RT and HIIT significantly affect SVI and MMI, with the effect of HIIT being much more pronounced (p < 0.001). Although HIIT endurance exercise was superior in favorably affecting cardiometabolic risk and particularly cardiac performance, both exercise methods positively affect cardiometabolic risk factors in this overweight to obese, middle-aged cohort of males with low time resources. Thus, the main practical application of our finding might be that in general overweight-obese people can freely choose their preferred exercise type (HIIT-END or HIT-RT) to improve their cardiometabolic health, while investing an amount of time that should be feasible for everybody. Trial Registrations: NCT01406730, NCT01766791.

Project description:BackgroundKidney transplant recipients (KTRs) exhibit unique elevated inflammation, impaired immune function, and increased cardiovascular risk. Although exercise reduces cardiovascular risk, there is limited research on this population, particularly surrounding novel high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of HIIT in KTRs.MethodsTwenty KTRs (male 14; eGFR 58±19 mL/min/1.73 m2; age 49±11 years) were randomised and completed one of three trials: HIIT A (4-, 2-, and 1-min intervals; 80-90% watts at V̇O2peak), HIITB (4×4 min intervals; 80-90% V̇O2peak) or MICT (~40 min; 50-60% V̇O2peak) for 24 supervised sessions on a stationary bike (approx. 3x/week over 8 weeks) and followed up for 3 months. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and intervention acceptability and adherence.ResultsTwenty participants completed the intervention, and 8 of whom achieved the required intensity based on power output (HIIT A, 0/6 [0%]; HIITB, 3/8 [38%]; MICT, 5/6 [83%]). Participants completed 92% of the 24 sessions with 105 cancelled and rescheduled sessions and an average of 10 weeks to complete the intervention. Pre-intervention versus post-intervention V̇O2peak (mL/kg-1/min-1) was 24.28±4.91 versus 27.06±4.82 in HIITA, 24.65±7.67 versus 27.48±8.23 in HIIT B, and 29.33±9.04 versus 33.05±9.90 in MICT. No adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThis is the first study to report the feasibility of HIIT in KTRs. Although participants struggled to achieve the required intensity (power), this study highlights the potential that exercise has to reduce cardiovascular risk in KTRs. HIIT and MICT performed on a cycle, with some modification, could be considered safe and feasible in KTRs. Larger scale trials are required to assess the efficacy of HIIT in KTRs and in particular identify the most appropriate intensities, recovery periods, and session duration. Some flexibility in delivery, such as incorporating home-based sessions, may need to be considered to improve recruitment and retention.Trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN17122775 . Registered on 30 January 2017.

Dataset Information

Feasibility study of high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risks in individuals with acute spinal cord injury.

Introduction

Methods and analysis

Ethics and dissemination

Trial registration number

Publications

Feasibility study of high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risks in individuals with acute spinal cord injury.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets