Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Is Virtual Learning Here to Stay? A Multispecialty Survey of Residents, Fellows, and Faculty.


ABSTRACT: The transition to virtual learning during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic marks a paradigm shift in graduate medical education (GME). From June to September 2021, we conducted a dual-center, multispecialty survey of residents, fellows, and faculty members to determine overall perceptions about virtual learning and assess its benefits, drawbacks, and future role in GME. We discovered a mainly positive view of virtual education among trainees (138/207, 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.73) and faculty (180/278, 0.65, 0.59-0.70). Large group sessions, such as didactic lectures, grand rounds, and national conferences, were ranked best-suited for the virtual environment, whereas small groups and procedural training were the lowest ranked. Major benefits and drawbacks to virtual learning was identified. A hybrid approach, combining in-person and virtual sessions, was the preferred format among trainees (167/207, 0.81, 0.75-0.86) and faculty (229/278, 0.82, 0.77-0.87). Virtual learning offers a valuable educational experience that should be retained in postpandemic GME curriculums.

SUBMITTER: Evans AZ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9911980 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Is Virtual Learning Here to Stay? A Multispecialty Survey of Residents, Fellows, and Faculty.

Evans Aron Z AZ   Adhaduk Mehul M   Jabri Ahmad R AR   Ashwath Mahi L ML  

Current problems in cardiology 20230210 6


The transition to virtual learning during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic marks a paradigm shift in graduate medical education (GME). From June to September 2021, we conducted a dual-center, multispecialty survey of residents, fellows, and faculty members to determine overall perceptions about virtual learning and assess its benefits, drawbacks, and future role in GME. We discovered a mainly positive view of virtual education among trainees (138/207, 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.73) and faculty (18  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6507920 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4675449 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8782130 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8360240 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10693391 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10643939 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8191369 | biostudies-literature
2022-09-07 | GSE212430 | GEO
| S-EPMC8821074 | biostudies-literature