Dataset Information

A narrative review of progress in the application of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome: subtypes and predictive models.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objective

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in different populations, and it is very challenging to manage heterogeneous patient groups. Artificial intelligence (AI) aids in interpreting complex data of patients with ARDS and can be used to detect adverse events as it can automatically capture complex relationships. This review aimed to explore the application and progress of AI in ARDS (e.g., subgroup classification of patients with ARDS via unsupervised clustering and supervised predictive models for early detection) and identify the current ARDS-related problems that can be solved using AI.

Methods

This comprehensive and narrative review was performed to obtain information about the application of AI in ARDS and summarize its subtypes and predictive models.

Key content and findings

The current applications of AI and machine learning in ARDS include ARDS subgroup classification, diagnosis, and survival prediction. In this review, the current problems that should be addressed by AI in ARDS were identified, and our findings may serve as a useful reference for its translational use in the ARDS field.

Conclusions

Owing to the discovery of hyper- and hypoinflammatory subtypes, individualized treatment of ARDS is possible, and diagnosis and survival prediction are essential in disease management and planning. However, prospective studies should clarify the reliability and generalizability of the results using AI and machine learning and performing bedside testing in larger populations to establish a more stable and time-resilient model. Therefore, a consensus on conducting and reporting machine learning studies in medicine should be urgently established.

SUBMITTER: Bai Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9929814 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A narrative review of progress in the application of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome: subtypes and predictive models.

Bai Yu Y Huang Xu X Xia Jingen J Zhan Qingyuan Q

Annals of translational medicine 20221220 2

<h4>Background and objective</h4>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in different populations, and it is very challenging to manage heterogeneous patient groups. Artificial intelligence (AI) aids in interpreting complex data of patients with ARDS and can be used to detect adverse events as it can automatically capture complex relationships. This review aimed to explore the application and progress of AI in ARDS (e.g., subgroup classification of patients with ARDS via unsupervised c ...[more]

PMID: 36819521

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Objective Vascular calcification has important clinical significance due to its vital prognostic value for cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, fracture, and other multisystem diseases. Radiology is the main diagnostic method of it, but facing great pressure such as the increasing workload and decreasing working accuracy rate. Therefore, radiology needs to find a way out to better realize the clinical value of vascular calcification. Artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses any algorithm imitating human intelligence. AI has shown great potential in image analysis, such as its high speed and accuracy, becoming the savior of the current situation. In order to promote more rational utilization, the role and progress of AI in this field were reviewed. Methods A search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. The key words included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “deep learning”, and “vascular calcification”. The qualitative analysis of literature was achieved through repeated deliberation after refining valuable content. The theme is the role and progress of AI in the diagnostic radiology of vascular calcification. Key Content and Findings Sixty-two articles were included. AI has been applied to the diagnostic radiology of 5 types of vascular calcification, including coronary artery calcification (CAC), thoracic aortic calcification (TAC), abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), carotid artery calcification, and breast artery calcification (BAC). Deep learning (DL), the latest technology in this field has been well applied and satisfactorily performed. Radiologists have been able to achieve efficient diagnosis of 5 types of vascular calcification through AI, with reliable accuracy. Conclusions Increasingly, advanced AI has achieved an accuracy comparable to that of human experts, with a faster speed. Moreover, the ability to reduce noise and artifacts enables more imaging equipment to obtain reliable quantification. AI has acquired the ability to cooperate with radiology departments in future work. However, the research in AAC and carotid artery calcification can be more in-depth, and more types of vascular calcification and more fields of radiology should be expanded to. The interpretation of results made by AI and the promotion of existing achievements to the development of other disciplines are also the focus in future.

Project description:The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has released the principles for the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology emphasizing fairness, accountability, oversight, equity, and transparency. However, the extent to which these principles are followed is unknown. The goal of this study was to assess the presence of biases and the quality of studies on AI models according to the ASCO principles and examine their potential impact through citation analysis and subsequent research applications. A review of original research articles centered on the evaluation of predictive models for cancer diagnosis published in the ASCO journal dedicated to informatics and data science in clinical oncology was conducted. Seventeen potential bias criteria were used to evaluate the sources of bias in the studies, aligned with the ASCO's principles for responsible AI use in oncology. The CREMLS checklist was applied to assess the study quality, focusing on the reporting standards, and the performance metrics along with citation counts of the included studies were analyzed. Nine studies were included. The most common biases were environmental and life-course bias, contextual bias, provider expertise bias, and implicit bias. Among the ASCO principles, the least adhered to were transparency, oversight and privacy, and human-centered AI application. Only 22% of the studies provided access to their data. The CREMLS checklist revealed the deficiencies in methodology and evaluation reporting. Most studies reported performance metrics within moderate to high ranges. Additionally, two studies were replicated in the subsequent research. In conclusion, most studies exhibited various types of bias, reporting deficiencies, and failure to adhere to the principles for responsible AI use in oncology, limiting their applicability and reproducibility. Greater transparency, data accessibility, and compliance with international guidelines are recommended to improve the reliability of AI-based research in oncology.

Dataset Information

A narrative review of progress in the application of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome: subtypes and predictive models.

Background and objective

Methods

Key content and findings

Conclusions

Publications

A narrative review of progress in the application of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome: subtypes and predictive models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets