Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.


ABSTRACT:

Background

There are limited data on uninsured patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study sought to compare the management and outcomes of AMI-CS between uninsured and privately insured individuals.

Methods

Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2016), a retrospective cohort of adult (≥18 years) uninsured admissions (primary payer-self-pay or no charge) were compared with privately insured individuals. Interhospital transfers were excluded. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, temporal trends in admissions, use of cardiac procedures, do-not-resuscitate status, palliative care referrals, and resource utilization.

Results

Of 402 182 AMI-CS admissions, 21 966 (5.4%) and 93 814 (23.3%) were uninsured and privately insured. Compared with private insured individuals, uninsured admissions were younger, male, from a lower socioeconomic status, had lower comorbidity, higher rates of acute organ failure, ST-segment elevation AMI-CS (77.3% versus 76.4%), and concomitant cardiac arrest (33.8% versus 31.9%; all P<0.001). Compared with 2000, in 2016, there were more uninsured (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.17]; P<0.001) and less privately insured admissions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83-0.87]; P<0.001). Uninsured individuals received less frequent coronary angiography (79.5% versus 81.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (60.8% versus 62.2%), mechanical circulatory support (54% versus 55.5%), and had higher palliative care (3.8% versus 3.2%) and do-not-resuscitate status use (4.4% versus 3.2%; all P<0.001). Uninsured admissions had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.55-1.68]; P<0.001) and resource utilization.

Conclusions

Uninsured individuals have higher in-hospital mortality and lower use of guideline-directed therapies in AMI-CS compared with privately insured individuals.

SUBMITTER: Vallabhajosyula S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9930186 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.

Vallabhajosyula Saraschandra S   Kumar Vinayak V   Sundaragiri Pranathi R PR   Cheungpasitporn Wisit W   Miller P Elliott PE   Harsha Patlolla Sri S   Gersh Bernard J BJ   Lerman Amir A   Jaffe Allan S AS   Shah Nilay D ND   Holmes David R DR   Bell Malcolm R MR   Barsness Gregory W GW  

Circulation. Heart failure 20220304 5


<h4>Background</h4>There are limited data on uninsured patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study sought to compare the management and outcomes of AMI-CS between uninsured and privately insured individuals.<h4>Methods</h4>Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2016), a retrospective cohort of adult (≥18 years) uninsured admissions (primary payer-self-pay or no charge) were compared with privately insured individuals. Interhospital transfers wer  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10051785 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6712338 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8751815 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12541219 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9661446 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11780372 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11012362 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10532159 | biostudies-literature