Dataset Information

The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The screening and diagnosis of intermittent claudication is a challenging process and often relies on the expertise of specialist vascular clinicians. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) as a screening tool for referrals of suspected intermittent claudication from primary to secondary care.

Method

Prospectively, 100 referrals from primary care with a stated diagnosis or query regarding intermittent claudication were recruited. All participants who completed the ECQ, underwent an anklebrachial pressure index (ABPI) assessment and treadmill exercise testing. Outcomes of the ECQ were compared to clinical diagnoses of intermittent claudication.

Results

The ECQ had a sensitivity of 46.8% (95% CI: 27-65%), specificity of 63.2% (95% CI: 43-82%) and accuracy of 53.0% (95% CI: 43-63%). The diagnostic performance was not changed by combining the ECQ with a positive ABPI or post-exercise ABPI outcome for PAD.

Conclusion

The ECQ had a poor diagnostic performance in this cohort. Considering the results found here and in other recent studies, the utility of the ECQ as a screening tool and epidemiological survey tool must be questioned. Novel, low-resource diagnostic tools are needed in this population.

SUBMITTER: Ibeggazene S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9936437 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication.

Ibeggazene Saïd S Stirrup Andrew A Pymer Sean S Palmer Joanne J Cai Paris L PL Smith George E GE Chetter Ian C IC

Vascular 20220210 1

<h4>Background</h4>The screening and diagnosis of intermittent claudication is a challenging process and often relies on the expertise of specialist vascular clinicians. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) as a screening tool for referrals of suspected intermittent claudication from primary to secondary care.<h4>Method</h4>Prospectively, 100 referrals from primary care with a stated diagnosis or query regarding intermittent claudi ...[more]

PMID: 35143731

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPeople with neuropathic-like symptoms had more unfavourable pain features than people with nociceptive. Moreover, deficient conditioned pain modulation is common in people with neuropathic-like symptoms. PainDETECT questionnaire have been used to assess the central sensitisation sign and symptoms. However, whether the painDETECT questionnaire can identify the conditioned pain modulation's impairment is still unknown. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the painDETECT questionnaire in detecting the impairment of conditioned pain modulation in people with musculoskeletal pain.MethodsWe conducted a diagnostic accuracy comparing the painDETECT questionnaire (index method) with the cold pressor test, the psychophysical test used to assess the conditioned pain modulation (reference standard). We determined diagnostic accuracy by calculating sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likely hood ratios.ResultsWe retrospectively enrolled 308 people with musculoskeletal pain in outpatient departments. Most participants were female (n 20 = 220, 71.4%) and had a mean age of 52.2 (± 15.0) years. One hundred seventy-three (56.1%) participants were classified as nociceptive pain, 69 (22.4%) as unclear, and 66 (21.4%) as neuropathic-like symptoms. According to the cold pressor test, 60 (19.4%) participants presented impairment of conditioned pain modulation. The cutoff point of 12 of the painDETECT questionnaire showed values of diagnostic accuracy below 70% compared to the cold pressor test, except for a negative predictive value [76.9 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 71.7 to 81.5]. The cutoff point 19 showed high specificity (78.6%, 95% CI 73.0 to 83.5), high negative predictive value (80.5%, 95% CI 78.1 to 82.7), and accuracy of 67.5% compared to the cold pressor test.ConclusionThe painDETECT questionnaire seems valuable for ruling out people with musculoskeletal pain and impairment of conditioned pain modulation.

Dataset Information

The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets