Comparison of different software for processing physical activity measurements with accelerometry

ABSTRACT: Several raw-data processing software for accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA) exist, but whether results agree has not been assessed. We examined the agreement between three different software for raw accelerometer data, and associated their results with cardiovascular risk. A cross-sectional analysis conducted between 2014 and 2017 in 2693 adults (53.4% female, 45–86 years) living in Lausanne, Switzerland was used. Participants wore the wrist-worn GENEActive accelerometer for 14 days. Data was processed with the GENEActiv manufacturer software, the Pampro package in Python and the GGIR package in R. For the latter, two sets of thresholds “White” and “MRC” defining levels of PA and two versions (1.5–9 and 1.11–1) for the “MRC” threshold were used. Cardiovascular risk was assessed

SUBMITTER: Verhoog S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9938888 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature