Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia: Post-hoc subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cachexia, a disorder associated with anorexia, inflammation, and muscle wasting, is frequent in cancer patients. We performed post-hoc analyses of the ONO-7643-04 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in subgroups of Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The patients were divided into subgroups by baseline characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, prior weight loss, performance status (PS), concomitant anticancer therapy, and number of previous chemotherapy regimens. The changes from baseline through to 12 weeks for lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and appetite were calculated. Appetite was evaluated using the quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ACD) item 8 score. Responder rates were defined as the maintenance/improvement of LBM (≥0 kg), body weight (≥0 kg), or QOL-ACD item 8 score (≥0) from baseline to all evaluation time points. Safety was evaluated in patients subgrouped by age and PS.

Results

Anamorelin resulted in greater improvements versus placebo in LBM, body weight, and appetite in most subgroups. Anamorelin was also associated with greater LBM, body weight, and appetite responder rates than placebo in nearly all subgroups. Among anamorelin-treated patients, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) tended to be more frequent with increasing age (<65 years, 19.2%; ≥65 to <75 years, 45.9%; ≥75 years, 60.0%) and PS score (PS 0-1, 38.4%; PS 2, 60.0%). The frequency of serious ADRs was 2.7% and 0% in the PS 0-1 and PS 2 subgroups, respectively.

Conclusion

This study of NSCLC patients with cancer cachexia revealed consistent improvements in LBM, body weight, and appetite across most subgroups of anamorelin-treated patients. This study also demonstrated the tolerability of anamorelin regardless of age and PS, with a low incidence of serious ADRs in each subgroup.

SUBMITTER: Takayama K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9939183 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia: Post-hoc subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled study.

Takayama Koichi K Takiguchi Toru T Komura Naoyuki N Naito Tateaki T

Cancer medicine 20221116 3

<h4>Background</h4>Cachexia, a disorder associated with anorexia, inflammation, and muscle wasting, is frequent in cancer patients. We performed post-hoc analyses of the ONO-7643-04 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in subgroups of Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).<h4>Methods</h4>The patients were divided into subgroups by baseline characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, prior weight loss, performance status (PS), concomitant antica ...[more]

PMID: 36394148

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo explore the potential factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and treatment differences between 75 mg/day and 75-225 mg/day dose in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).MethodsWe performed exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in Japan. A total of 538 outpatients aged 20 years or older with a primary diagnosis of MDD who experienced single or recurrent episodes were randomized into three groups: fixed-dose, flexible-dose, or placebo. Venlafaxine ER was initiated at 37.5 mg/day and titrated to 75 mg/day for both fixed-dose and flexible-dose group, and to 225 mg/day for flexible-dose group (if well tolerated). Efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline at Week 8 using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 items (HAM-D17) total score, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-6 items score, and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. The following factors were considered in the subgroup analyses: sex, age, HAM-D17 total score at baseline, duration of MDD, duration of current depressive episode, history of previous depressive episodes, history of previous medications for MDD, and CYP2D6 phenotype. For each subgroup, an analysis of covariance model was fitted and the adjusted mean of the treatment effect and corresponding 95% CI were computed. Due to the exploratory nature of the investigation, no statistical hypothesis testing was used.ResultsVenlafaxine ER improved symptoms of MDD compared with placebo in most subgroups. The subgroup with a long duration of MDD (>22 months) consistently showed greater treatment benefits in the flexible-dose group than in the fixed-dose group.ConclusionThese results suggest that a greater treatment response to venlafaxine ER (up to 225 mg/day) can be seen in patients with a longer duration of MDD. Further investigations are needed to identify additional factors impacting the efficacy of venlafaxine ER.

Project description:ObjectiveEpisodes of major depressive disorder (MDD) characterized by high levels of anxiety symptoms are less likely to respond to some forms of antidepressant treatment (ADT). This report examines the effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole on depressive symptoms among patients with MDD and anxiety symptoms.Materials and methodsThis was a post hoc analysis of 1,171 patients from the 6-week, randomized, double-blind phases of three studies in adults with MDD and inadequate response to ADTs (NCT01360645, NCT01360632, NCT02196506). Data were pooled for brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day and for placebo (adjunct to ADT). Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Total score changes were assessed in subgroups of patients with and without anxious distress (based on proxies for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria) and anxious depression (defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety/somatization factor score of ≥7). Safety was assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).ResultsBenefits were seen for adjunctive brexpiprazole (compared with adjunctive placebo) in both anxiety definition subgroups. For patients with anxious distress, the least squares mean difference (95% CI) at week 6 was -3.00 (-4.29, -1.71; P<0.0001) and, for those without anxious distress, was -1.38 (-2.71, -0.05; P=0.043). For patients with anxious depression, the difference was -2.19 (-3.60, -0.78; P=0.0023), compared with -2.34 (-3.58, -1.10; P=0.0002) for those without anxious depression. The most common TEAEs among patients with anxiety symptoms receiving ADT + brexpiprazole were akathisia, headache, restlessness, somnolence, and weight increase. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the rates of these TEAEs according to the presence or absence of anxiety symptoms.ConclusionAdjunctive brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day may be efficacious in reducing depressive symptoms, and was well tolerated, in patients with clinically relevant anxiety symptoms.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia: Post-hoc subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia: Post-hoc subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets