Dataset Information

Development and Validation of the HIV-CARDIO-PREDICT Score to Estimate the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV-Infected Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Commonly used risk assessment tools for cardiovascular disease might not be accurate for HIV-infected patients.

Objective

We aimed to develop a model to accurately predict the 10-year cardiovascular disease (CV) risk of HIV-infected patients.

Design

In this retrospective cohort study, adult HIV-infected patients seen at Boston Medical Center between March 2012 and January 2017 were divided into model development and validation cohorts.

Setting

Boston Medical Center, a tertiary, academic medical center.

Participants

Adult HIV-infected patients, seen in inpatient and outpatient setting.

Main outcomes and measures

We used logistic regression to create a prediction risk model for cardiovascular events using data from the development cohort. Using a point-based risk-scoring system, we summarized the relationship between risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We then used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to evaluate model discrimination. Finally, we tested the model using a validation cohort.

Results

1914 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The model had excellent discrimination for CVD risk [AUC 0.989; (95% CI: 0.986-0.993)] and included the following 11 variables: male sex (95% CI: 2.53-3.99), African American race/ethnicity (95% CI: 1.50-3.13), current age (95% CI: 0.07-0.13), age at HIV diagnosis (95% CI: -0.10-(-0.02)), peak HIV viral load (95% CI: 9.89 × 10^-7-3.00 × 10^-6), nadir CD4 lymphocyte count (95% CI: -0.03-(-0.02)), hypertension (95% CI: 0.20-1.54), hyperlipidemia (95% CI: 3.03-4.60), diabetes (95% CI: 0.61-1.89), chronic kidney disease (95% CI: 1.26-2.62), and smoking (95% CI: 0.12-2.39). The eleven-parameter multiple logistic regression model had excellent discrimination [AUC 0.957; (95% CI: 0.938-0.975)] when applied to the validation cohort.

Conclusions and relevance

Our novel HIV-CARDIO-PREDICT Score may provide a rapid and accurate evaluation of CV disease risk among HIV-infected patients and inform prevention measures.

SUBMITTER: Karanika S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9953852 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development and Validation of the HIV-CARDIO-PREDICT Score to Estimate the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV-Infected Patients.

Karanika Styliani S Karantanos Theodoros T Carneiro Herman H Assoumou Sabrina A SA

Cells 20230205 4

<h4>Importance</h4>Commonly used risk assessment tools for cardiovascular disease might not be accurate for HIV-infected patients.<h4>Objective</h4>We aimed to develop a model to accurately predict the 10-year cardiovascular disease (CV) risk of HIV-infected patients.<h4>Design</h4>In this retrospective cohort study, adult HIV-infected patients seen at Boston Medical Center between March 2012 and January 2017 were divided into model development and validation cohorts.<h4>Setting</h4>Boston Medic ...[more]

PMID: 36831190

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, and the treatments markedly elevate the survival rate of the patients in recent years. However, the prevalence of cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in MM had been increasing recently. CVAEs in MM patients are an important problem that we should focus on. Clinical tools for prognostication and risk-stratification are needed.Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective study that included patients who were newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma (NDMM) in Shanghai Changzheng Hospital and Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2018 to July 2020. A total of 253 patients from two medical centers were divided into training cohort and validation cohort randomly. Univariable analysis of the baseline factors was performed using CVAEs endpoints. Multivariable analysis identified three factors for a prognostic model that was validated in internal validation cohorts.ResultsFactors independently associated with CVAEs in NDMM were as follows: age>61 years old, high level of baseline office blood pressure, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Age contributed 2 points, and the other two factors contributed 1 point to a prognostic model. The model distinguished the patients into three groups: 3-4 points, high risk; 2 points, intermediate risk; 0-1 point, low risk. These groups had significant difference in CVAEs during follow-up days in both training cohort (p<0.0001) and validation cohort (p=0.0018). In addition, the model had good calibration. The C-indexes for the prediction of overall survival of CVAEs in the training and validation cohorts were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.79) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.81), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of the 1-year CVAEs probability in the training and validation cohorts were 0.738 and 0.673, respectively. The AUROCs of the 2-year CVAE probability in the training and validation cohorts were 0.722 and 0.742, respectively. The decision-curve analysis indicated that the prediction model provided greater net benefit than the default strategies of providing assessment or not providing assessment for all patients.ConclusionA prognostic risk prediction model for predicting CVAEs risk of NDMM patients was developed and internally validated. Patients at increased risk of CVAEs can be identified at treatment initiation and be more focused on cardiovascular protection in the treatment plan.

Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to assess the validity of an easy-to-calculate chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk score developed by the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) group in a longitudinal observational study of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the USA.MethodsPLWH (2002-2016) without prior exposure to potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral agents and with at least three estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) test results were identified in the Observational Pharmaco-Epidemiology Research and Analysis (OPERA® ) cohort. Three samples were drawn independently using the same eligibility criteria but each using a different eGFR equation, specifically the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR estimation method. Full and short D:A:D risk scores were applied. CKD was defined as a confirmed decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (stages 3-5). Poisson models estimated the association between CKD incidence and a one-point increase in the continuous risk score. The incidence rate ratio (IRR), adjusted IRR (aIRR), and Harrell's discrimination statistic were used to assess validity.ResultsThere were 19 444, 22 727 and 22 748 PLWH in the OPERA C-G, CKD-EPI and MDRD samples, respectively. The median (minimum-maximum) follow-up duration was 6.1 (0.3-9.1) years in the D:A:D cohort and ranged from 3.2 to 3.5 (0.2-15.5) years in the OPERA validation samples. The observation time for the majority of PLWH in the D:A:D cohort began prior to 2006, in stark contrast to the OPERA validation samples, where the majority of PLWH were observed after 2011. The CKD incidence ranged from 7.3 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.8, 7.9 per 1000 person-years] in OPERA C-G to 11.0 (95% CI 10.4, 11.6 per 1000 person-years) in OPERA MDRD. In OPERA samples, IRRs by risk group and adjusted IRRs (full risk score) were similar to those in the D:A:D derivation cohort (adjusted IRR 1.3; 95% CI 1.3, 1.3). Harrell's c-statistic ranged from 0.87 to 0.92 in the OPERA samples, comparable to that in the derivation cohort (0.92). Results for short scores were similar.ConclusionsThe findings support the validity of the D:A:D risk scoring method for assessing CKD (stages 3-5) probability in an exclusively USA-based sample regardless of eGFR method.

Project description:ObjectiveTo date, the extent to which social determinants of health (SDOH) may help identify individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) - beyond traditional risk factors - has not been quantified using a cumulative social disadvantage approach. The objective of this study was to develop, and validate, a polysocial risk score (PsRS) for prevalent ASCVD in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States (US).MethodsWe used data from the 2013-2017 National Health Interview Survey. A total of 38 SDOH were identified from the database. Stepwise and criterion-based selection approaches were applied to derive PsRS, after adjusting for traditional risk factors. Logistic regression models were fitted to assign risk scores to individual SDOH, based on relative effect size magnitudes. PsRS was calculated by summing risk scores for individual SDOH, for each participant; and validated using a separate validation cohort.ResultsFinal sample comprised 164,696 adults. PsRS included 7 SDOH: unemployment, inability to pay medical bills, low income, psychological distress, delayed care due to lack of transport, food insecurity, and less than high school education. PsRS ranged from 0-20 and exhibited excellent calibration and discrimination. Individuals with the highest PsRS (5th quintile) had nearly 4-fold higher ASCVD prevalence, relative to those with the lowest risk scores (1st quintile). Area under receiver operating curve (AU-ROC) for PsRS with SDOH alone was 0.836. Addition of SDOH to the model with only demographic and clinical risk factors (AU-ROC=0.852) improved overall discriminatory power, with AU-ROC for final PsRS (demographics + clinical + SDOH) = 0.862.ConclusionsCumulatively, SDOH may help identify individuals with ASCVD, beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, we provide a unique validated PsRS for ASCVD in a national sample of US adults. Future study should target development of similar scores in diverse populations, and incorporate longitudinal study designs.

Dataset Information

Development and Validation of the HIV-CARDIO-PREDICT Score to Estimate the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV-Infected Patients.

Importance

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Development and Validation of the HIV-CARDIO-PREDICT Score to Estimate the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV-Infected Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets