Dataset Information

Evidence for Strand Asymmetry in Different Plastid Genomes.

ABSTRACT: A common genome composition pattern in eubacteria is an asymmetry between the leading and lagging strands resulting in opposite skew patterns in the two replichores that lie between the origin and terminus of replication. Although this pattern has been reported for a couple of isolated plastid genomes, it is not clear how widespread it is overall in this chromosome. Using a random walk approach, we examine plastid genomes outside of the land plants, which are excluded since they are known not to initiate replication at a single site, for such a pattern of asymmetry. Although it is not a common feature, we find that it is detectable in the plastid genome of species from several diverse lineages. The euglenozoa in particular show a strong skew pattern as do several rhodophytes. There is a weaker pattern in some chlorophytes but it is not apparent in other lineages. The ramifications of this for analyses of plastid evolution are discussed.

SUBMITTER: Ruan C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9956171 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evidence for Strand Asymmetry in Different Plastid Genomes.

Ruan Cindy C Morton Brian R BR

Genes 20230126 2

A common genome composition pattern in eubacteria is an asymmetry between the leading and lagging strands resulting in opposite skew patterns in the two replichores that lie between the origin and terminus of replication. Although this pattern has been reported for a couple of isolated plastid genomes, it is not clear how widespread it is overall in this chromosome. Using a random walk approach, we examine plastid genomes outside of the land plants, which are excluded since they are known not to ...[more]

PMID: 36833247

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPhylogenetic relationships among Eastern Hemisphere cypresses, Western Hemisphere cypresses, junipers, and their closest relatives are controversial, and generic delimitations have been in flux for the past decade. To address relationships and attempt to produce a more robust classification, we sequenced 11 new plastid genomes (plastomes) from the five variously described genera in this complex (Callitropsis, Cupressus, Hesperocyparis, Juniperus, and Xanthocyparis) and compared them with additional plastomes from diverse members of Cupressaceae.ResultsPhylogenetic analysis of protein-coding genes recovered a topology in which Juniperus is sister to Cupressus, whereas a tree based on whole plastomes indicated that the Callitropsis-Hesperocyparis-Xanthocyparis (CaHX) clade is sister to Cupressus. A sliding window analysis of site-specific phylogenetic support identified a ~ 15 kb region, spanning the genes ycf1 and ycf2, which harbored an anomalous signal relative to the rest of the genome. After excluding these genes, trees based on the remainder of the genes and genome consistently recovered a topology grouping the CaHX clade and Cupressus with strong bootstrap support. In contrast, trees based on the ycf1 and ycf2 region strongly supported a sister relationship between Cupressus and Juniperus.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that standard phylogenomic analyses can result in strongly supported but conflicting trees. We suggest that the conflicting plastomic signals result from an ancient introgression event involving ycf1 and ycf2 that occurred in an ancestor of this species complex. The introgression event was facilitated by plastomic recombination in an ancestral heteroplasmic individual carrying distinct plastid haplotypes, offering further evidence that recombination occurs between plastomes. Finally, we provide strong support for previous proposals to recognize five genera in this species complex: Callitropsis, Cupressus, Hesperocyparis, Juniperus, and Xanthocyparis.

Dataset Information

Evidence for Strand Asymmetry in Different Plastid Genomes.

Publications

Evidence for Strand Asymmetry in Different Plastid Genomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets