Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Propensity-Adjusted Comparison of Mortality of Elderly Versus Very Elderly Ventilated Patients.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The growing proportion of elderly intensive care patients constitutes a public health challenge. The benefit of critical care in these patients remains unclear. We compared outcomes in elderly versus very elderly subjects receiving mechanical ventilation.

Methods

In total, 5,557 mechanically ventilated subjects were included in our post hoc retrospective analysis, a subgroup of the VENTILA study. We divided the cohort into 2 subgroups on the basis of age: very elderly subjects (age ≥ 80 y; n = 1,430), and elderly subjects (age 65-79 y; n = 4,127). A propensity score on being very elderly was calculated. Evaluation of associations with 28-d mortality was done with logistic regression analysis.

Results

Very elderly subjects were clinically sicker as expressed by higher SAPS II scores (53 ± 18 vs 50 ± 18, P < .001), and their rates of plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O were higher, whereas other parameters did not differ. The 28-d mortality was higher in very elderly subjects (42% vs 34%, P < .001) and remained unchanged after propensity score adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 1.31 [95% CI 1.16-1.49], P < .001).

Conclusions

Age was an independent and unchangeable risk factor for death in mechanically ventilated subjects. However, survival rates of very elderly subjects were > 50%. Denial of critical care based solely on age is not justified. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02731898.).

SUBMITTER: Wernly B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9994107 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Propensity-Adjusted Comparison of Mortality of Elderly Versus Very Elderly Ventilated Patients.

Wernly Bernhard B   Bruno Raphael Romano RR   Frutos-Vivar Fernando F   Peñuelas Oscar O   Rezar Richard R   Raymondos Konstantinos K   Muriel Alfonso A   Du Bin B   Thille Arnaud W AW   Ríos Fernando F   González Marco M   Del-Sorbo Lorenzo L   Marín Maria Del Carmen MDC   Pinheiro Bruno Valle BV   Soares Marco Antonio MA   Nin Nicolas N   Maggiore Salvatore M SM   Bersten Andrew A   Kelm Malte M   Amin Pravin P   Cakar Nahit N   Young Suh Gee G   Abroug Fekri F   Jibaja Manuel M   Matamis Dimitros D   Zeggwagh Amine Ali AA   Sutherasan Yuda Y   Guidet Bertrand B   De Lange Dylan W DW   Beil Michael M   Svri Sigal S   van Heerden Vernon V   Flaatten Hans H   Anzueto Antonio A   Osmani Venet V   Esteban Andrés A   Jung Christian C  

Respiratory care 20210302 5


<h4>Background</h4>The growing proportion of elderly intensive care patients constitutes a public health challenge. The benefit of critical care in these patients remains unclear. We compared outcomes in elderly versus very elderly subjects receiving mechanical ventilation.<h4>Methods</h4>In total, 5,557 mechanically ventilated subjects were included in our post hoc retrospective analysis, a subgroup of the VENTILA study. We divided the cohort into 2 subgroups on the basis of age: very elderly s  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5718912 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7673873 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5571994 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6893044 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7656995 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8006691 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6728251 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6743207 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9992631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5826727 | biostudies-literature