Dataset Information

The effect of COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breast-feeding mothers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

COVID-19 hesitancy among women planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breast-feeding is still a global phenomenon. Unfortunately, there is a lack of national educational programs that provide those groups of people with the information they need about the vaccine.

Objective

This study investigated the effect of the COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant and breast-feeding mothers.

Methods

This study implemented a quasi-experimental pre-post design and was conducted in Jordan. It was a two-time study and had two groups of women; 220 women participated in the control group, and 205 women participated in the intervention group (those received the tele-educational program). All participating women answered the demographic characteristics sheet and the Arabic version of Hesitancy About COVID-19 Vaccination Questionnaire twice.

Results

Results showed that after conducting the program the interventional group reported significantly higher vaccination rate and lower mean score of hesitancy than the control group (M = 24.67, SD = 5.11; M = 27.45, SD = 4.92; respectively) t (423) = -4.116, p-value < 0.001. Moreover, before the program, women in the intervention group reported significantly higher levels of hesitancy compared to those in the same group after the program (M = 28.35, SD = 4.91; M = 24.66, SD = 5.11; respectively) t (204) = 17.83, p-value < 0.001.

Conclusions

The study concluded that awareness of pregnant women after being given the tele-education program about COVID-19 vaccination decreased their hesitancy and improved their willingness to participate in the COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, health workers should focus on providing scientific-based information about the vaccine to reduce the doubts of pregnant women about participating in the COVID-19.

SUBMITTER: Momani A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9997991 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effect of COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breast-feeding mothers.

Momani Aaliyah A Hamaideh Shaher H SH Masadeh Arwa B AB Alhalaiqa Fadwa F Bani Mostafa Fadi N FN Weld Ali Haneen Isam HI Masa'Deh Rami R

PloS one 20230309 3

<h4>Background</h4>COVID-19 hesitancy among women planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breast-feeding is still a global phenomenon. Unfortunately, there is a lack of national educational programs that provide those groups of people with the information they need about the vaccine.<h4>Objective</h4>This study investigated the effect of the COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant and ...[more]

PMID: 36893108

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWomen planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breastfeeding are more hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines compared to other women globally.AimThis study investigates COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women, who are planning for pregnancy, currently pregnant, and breastfeeding women in Jordan.MethodsAn online cross-sectional study was conducted in the biggest three cities in Jordan, including 874 women.ResultsWomen who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 (7.12 ± 0.72, 7.53 ± 1.80, 7.2439 ± 7296, respectively), significant lower levels of perceived benefits of the vaccine (8.92 ± 2.15, 8.73 ± 1.93, 9.09 ± 2.10, respectively), significant lower levels of motivation and causes of action (7.15 ± 1.71, 6.7524 ± 1.40, 7.27 ± 1.68, respectively), and significantly higher levels of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy (31.32 ± 6.40, 30.11 ± 4.49, 30.27 ± 6.29, respectively) than other women. Married women, those whoe were previously infected with COVID-19, and those who had chronic diseases reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of COVID-19 seriousness, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccine, motivation to take COVID-19 vaccine, and causes of action, and significantly higher levels of hesitancy to take COVID-19 vaccine than unmarried women, those who have not been infected with COVID-19, and those who were medically healthy (p<0.001). There were statistically significant positive correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with years of education; and statistically significant negative correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with age (p<0.001).ConclusionsWomen who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding in Jordan showed miderate scores in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy despite the current international recommendations for its safety for women and their foetuses or neonates.

Project description:In the era of vaccine hesitancy, highlighted by the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic, there is an acute need to develop an approach to reduce and address apprehension towards vaccinations. We sought to map and present an overview of existing educational interventions for healthcare providers (HCPs) on strategies to engage in effective vaccine discussion. We applied the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework in this scoping review. We searched five relevant databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) and grey literature through the Google search engine using keywords and subject headings that were systematically identified. We identified 3384 citations in peer-reviewed literature and 41 citations in grey literature. After screening for our inclusion criteria, we included 28 citations from peer reviewed literature and 16 citations from grey literature for analysis. We identified a total of 41 unique education interventions. Interventions were available from multiple disciplines, training levels, clinical settings, and diseases/vaccines. Interventions predominantly centered around two foci: knowledge sharing and communication training. Most interventions identified from peer-reviewed literature were facilitated and were applied with multiple modes of delivery. Interventions from grey literature were more topical and generally self-directed. We identified several gaps in knowledge. Firstly, accessibility and generalizability of interventions was limited. Secondly, distribution of interventions did not adequately address nursing and pharmacy disciplines, and did not cover the breadth of medical specialties for whom vaccine discussions apply. Thirdly, no interventions addressed self monitoring and the clinicians' recognition and management of emotions during difficult conversations. There is a need to address this gap and provide available, credible and comprehensive educational interventions that will support our healthcare providers in effective communication with vaccine hesitant patients.

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the vaccines' acceptance level and to find the factors influencing pregnant women's vaccination decisions, with the goal of assisting in the development of interventions and promoting more research in this area.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed.Eligibility criteriaStudies providing any kind of quantitative assessment of overall COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among pregnant women in any country or region across the globe.Data extraction and synthesisThe pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup (sensitivity) analysis was performed to determine the overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level to understand the sources of substantial heterogeneity.ResultsOut of the 375 studies identified, 17 studies from four continents assessing 25 147 participants (pregnant women) were included in this study. Among the participants, only 49% (95% CI 42% to 56%, p<0.001) had COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. High-income countries (47%; 95% CI 38% to 55%, p<0.001), participants with fewer than 12 years of education (38%; 95% CI 19% to 58%, p<0.001) and multiparous women (48%; 95% CI 31% to 66%, p<0.001) had lower COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Overall heterogeneity was high (I2 ≥98%), and publication bias was present (p<0.001). A very weak positive correlation between COVID-19 knowledge and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was observed (r=0.164; 95% CI -0.946 to 0.972; p=0.8359).ConclusionOverall, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was low across the studies and considerably low among some specific subgroups of participants. These research findings have implications for the development of effective interventions that could increase the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level among pregnant women to attain herd immunity.Prospero registration numberCRD42021277754.

Project description:BackgroundPregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Disorders (PIHD) include conditions like Pre-Eclampsia, Eclampsia, and Gestational Hypertension, impacting 5-10% of pregnancies globally. These disorders are responsible for 16% of maternal deaths in Sub-Saharan Africa and account for 16.9% of maternal mortality in Ethiopia, representing 10% of the country's total maternal deaths.ObjectiveTo identify predictors of PIHD among pregnant and delivery women in public hospitals and primary health care units (health centers) in Sidama, Ethiopia.MethodsA multi-center unmatched case-control study was conducted on women in antenatal care and obstetrics/gynecology departments at 12 randomly selected public health institutions, including one specialized teaching hospital, two general hospitals, three primary hospitals, and six health centers. The study involved 920 women (230 cases and 690 controls) selected from December 2023 to February 2024. Cases included pregnant or delivery women at 20 + weeks gestation with PIHD such as pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia. Controls were normotensive pregnant women or delivering mothers without PIHD after 20 weeks gestation. Data was manually verified, entered, and validated using Epidata software, followed by analysis with SPSS 22. Univariate analysis assessed predictors of PIHD, while binary logistic regression evaluated the relationships between factors. Model fitness was checked using collinearity assessments and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, with variables having a P value < 0.05 deemed independent predictors.ResultsOut of 920 planned participants, 686 were included, resulting in a response rate of 94.35%. Factors associated with PIHD in women included age at first conception (AOR = 1.26), mid (AOR = 6.05) and high (AOR = 5.01) wealth index levels, multigravidity (AOR = 4.34), pregnancy age ≥ 42 weeks (AOR = 3.65), maternal mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) (AOR = 1.29), hemoglobin levels of 6.5-10.9 g/dL (AOR = 5.59), pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/M2 (AOR = 0.81), preexisting hypertension (AOR = 8.97), family history of diabetes mellitus (AOR = 20.02), former alcohol consumption (AOR = 0.27), and total physical activity during pregnancy (AOR = 0.54).ConclusionsThe study identifies key predictors of PIHD in women, including age at conception, wealth index, multigravidity, gestational age, and pre-pregnancy BMI. It underscores the link between socioeconomic status and maternal health, highlighting that financial resources alone don't ensure better outcomes without educational access. The research advocates for a health intervention strategy focusing on socioeconomic factors and public health initiatives to reduce maternal health disparities while exploring the role of partner stability and psychosocial aspects.

Dataset Information

The effect of COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breast-feeding mothers.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The effect of COVID-19 vaccine tele-educational program on vaccine hesitancy and receiving the vaccine among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breast-feeding mothers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets