Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Systematic Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) is being advocated as the foundation for encoding clinical documentation. While the electronic medical record is likely to play a critical role in pharmacovigilance - the detection of adverse events due to medications - classification and reporting of Adverse Events is currently based on the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Complete and high-quality MedDRA-to-SNOMED CT mappings can therefore facilitate pharmacovigilance. The existing mappings, as determined through the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), are partial, and record only one-to-one correspondences even though SNOMED CT can be used compositionally. Efforts to map previously unmapped MedDRA concepts would be most productive if focused on concepts that occur frequently in actual adverse event data. We aimed to identify aspects of MedDRA that complicate mapping to SNOMED CT, determine pattern in unmapped high-frequency MedDRA concepts, and to identify types of integration errors in the mapping of MedDRA to UMLS. METHODS: Using one years' data from the US Federal Drug Administrations Adverse Event Reporting System, we identified MedDRA preferred terms that collectively accounted for 95% of both Adverse Events and Therapeutic Indications records. After eliminating those already mapping to SNOMED CT, we attempted to map the remaining 645 Adverse-Event and 141 Therapeutic-Indications preferred terms with software assistance. RESULTS: All but 46 Adverse-Event and 7 Therapeutic-Indications preferred terms could be composed using SNOMED CT concepts: none of these required more than 3 SNOMED CT concepts to compose. We describe the common composition patterns in the paper. About 30% of both Adverse-Event and Therapeutic-Indications Preferred Terms corresponded to single SNOMED CT concepts: the correspondence was detectable by human inspection but had been missed during the integration process, which had created duplicated concepts in UMLS. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of composite mapping patterns, and the types of errors that occur in the MedDRA content within UMLS, can focus larger-scale efforts on improving the quality of such mappings, which may assist in the creation of an adverse-events ontology.

SUBMITTER: Nadkarni PM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2988705 | BioStudies | 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

1000-01-01 | S-EPMC2908062 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC2995664 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC3533586 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6495095 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6374626 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7165158 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6951864 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7233070 | BioStudies
2018-01-01 | S-EPMC5968362 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7566369 | BioStudies