Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Group-based trajectory modeling to assess adherence to biologics among patients with psoriasis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Proportion of days covered (PDC), a commonly used adherence metric, does not provide information about the longitudinal course of adherence to treatment over time. Group-based trajectory model (GBTM) is an alternative method that overcomes this limitation.

Methods

The statistical principles of GBTM and PDC were applied to assess adherence during a 12-month follow-up in psoriasis patients starting treatment with a biologic. The optimal GBTM model was determined on the basis of the balance between each model's Bayesian information criterion and the percentage of patients in the smallest group in each model. Variables potentially predictive of adherence were evaluated.

Results

In all, 3,249 patients were included in the analysis. Four GBTM adherence groups were suggested by the optimal model, and patients were categorized as demonstrating continuously high adherence, high-then-low adherence, moderate-then-low adherence, or consistently moderate adherence during follow-up. For comparison, four PDC groups were constructed: PDC Group 4 (PDC ?75%), PDC Group 3 (25%? PDC <50%), PDC Group 2 (PDC <25%), and PDC Group 1 (50%? PDC <75%). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients (97.9%) from PDC Group 2 demonstrated moderate-then-low adherence, whereas 96.4% of patients from PDC Group 4 showed continuously high adherence. The remaining PDC-based categorizations did not capture patients with uniform adherence behavior based on GBTM. In PDC Group 3, 25.3%, 17.2%, and 57.5% of patients exhibited GBTM-defined consistently moderate adherence, moderate-then-low adherence, or high-then-low adherence, respectively. In PDC Group 1, 70.8%, 23.6%, and 5.7% of patients had consistently moderate adherence, high-then-low adherence, and continuously high adherence, respectively. Additional analyses suggested GBTM-based categorization was best predicted by patient age, sex, certain comorbidities, and particular drug use.

Conclusion

GBTM is a more appropriate way to model dynamic behaviors and offers researchers an alternative to more traditional drug adherence measurements.

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3986333 | BioStudies |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8784627 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC9251982 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC6035896 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC6383266 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC6684050 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC4978686 | BioStudies
2014-01-01 | S-EPMC6649436 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC7058496 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC6283256 | BioStudies
| S-EPMC8325860 | BioStudies