Dataset Information


The contribution of phonological knowledge, memory, and language background to reading comprehension in deaf populations.

ABSTRACT: UNLABELLED:While reading is challenging for many deaf individuals, some become proficient readers. Little is known about the component processes that support reading comprehension in these individuals. Speech-based phonological knowledge is one of the strongest predictors of reading comprehension in hearing individuals, yet its role in deaf readers is controversial. This could reflect the highly varied language backgrounds among deaf readers as well as the difficulty of disentangling the relative contribution of phonological versus orthographic knowledge of spoken language, in our case 'English,' in this population. Here we assessed the impact of language experience on reading comprehension in deaf readers by recruiting oral deaf individuals, who use spoken English as their primary mode of communication, and deaf native signers of American Sign Language. First, to address the contribution of spoken English phonological knowledge in deaf readers, we present novel tasks that evaluate phonological versus orthographic knowledge. Second, the impact of this knowledge, as well as memory measures that rely differentially on phonological (serial recall) and semantic (free recall) processing, on reading comprehension was evaluated. The best predictor of reading comprehension differed as a function of language experience, with free recall being a better predictor in deaf native signers than in oral deaf. In contrast, the measures of English phonological knowledge, independent of orthographic knowledge, best predicted reading comprehension in oral deaf individuals. These results suggest successful reading strategies differ across deaf readers as a function of their language experience, and highlight a possible alternative route to literacy in deaf native signers. HIGHLIGHTS:1. Deaf individuals vary in their orthographic and phonological knowledge of English as a function of their language experience. 2. Reading comprehension was best predicted by different factors in oral deaf and deaf native signers. 3. Free recall memory (primacy effect) better predicted reading comprehension in deaf native signers as compared to oral deaf or hearing individuals. 4. Language experience should be taken into account when considering cognitive processes that mediate reading in deaf individuals.


PROVIDER: S-EPMC4548088 | BioStudies | 2015-01-01

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6627215 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC4050738 | BioStudies
2013-01-01 | S-EPMC3808502 | BioStudies
2010-01-01 | S-EPMC4617338 | BioStudies
2014-01-01 | S-EPMC3938551 | BioStudies
2017-01-01 | S-EPMC5478736 | BioStudies
2013-01-01 | S-EPMC3554651 | BioStudies
2018-01-01 | S-EPMC6331404 | BioStudies
2013-01-01 | S-EPMC3595400 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7250424 | BioStudies