Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium/Formoterol versus Tiotropium in COPD: Results of an Indirect Treatment Comparison.


ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 ?g twice daily compared to tiotropium 18 ?g once daily in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS:A systematic literature review performed in March 2014, using a predefined search strategy in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, identified 17 randomized placebo-controlled trials, (tiotropium n = 15; aclidinium/formoterol n = 2). Outcomes of interest were: bronchodilation (peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), COPD symptoms [Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and % of responders (>1 unit improvement)] and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) [St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and % responders (>4 unit improvement)], % of patients with ?1 exacerbations, adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), hospitalization and mortality, all at 24 weeks. In the absence of head-to-head trials between aclidinium/formoterol and tiotropium, a Bayesian indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was used with placebo as common control. RESULTS:Regarding bronchodilation, aclidinium/formoterol was found to be more efficacious than tiotropium at peak FEV1, with mean difference in change from baseline (DCFB) 143 mL [95% credible interval (CrI): 112, 174] and at trough FEV1 [DCFB 26 mL (95% CrI -2, 55)]. Aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in improving dyspnea symptoms measured by TDI [DCFB 0.54 points (95% CrI 0.09, 0.99); odds ratio (OR) of responders 1.51 (95% CrI 1.11, 2.06)]. SGRQ results are comparable for aclidinium/formoterol versus tiotropium [DCFB -0.52 (95% CrI -2.21, 1.17); OR of responders 1.16 (95% CrI 0.47, 2.87)]. The ITC results suggest similar safety profiles regarding AEs, SAEs and hospitalization. CONCLUSION:Based on the ITC, aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in terms of lung function and symptom control while providing comparable HRQoL results and safety profile. FUNDING:AstraZeneca.

SUBMITTER: Medic G 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4833795 | BioStudies | 2016-01-01

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

2012-01-01 | S-EPMC3512498 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC3772873 | BioStudies
2013-01-01 | S-EPMC4014806 | BioStudies
2014-01-01 | S-EPMC4273456 | BioStudies
2017-01-01 | S-EPMC5476673 | BioStudies
2013-01-01 | S-EPMC3787813 | BioStudies
2014-01-01 | S-EPMC4213545 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6396834 | BioStudies
2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4655912 | BioStudies
2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4531806 | BioStudies