Dataset Information


Pacifists and Revenge-Seekers in Response to Unambiguous Peer Provocation.

ABSTRACT: In order to better understand why some children retaliate when they feel provoked and others do not, the present study identified "pacifistically-oriented" children who made negative interpretations in response to unambiguous provocations, yet did not endorse revenge goals, and compared them to "revenge-seeking" children who also made negative interpretations but did endorse revenge goals. Groups were identified based on seventh graders' (N?=?367; 54.77% male; 22.89% racial/ethnic minority) responses to hypothetical situations in which a peer excluded and insulted them. Comparing these groups revealed that Pacifists endorsed relationship-maintaining goals and emotion regulation goals more highly than Revenge-Seekers. Revenge-Seekers reported more anger and endorsed beliefs about negative reciprocity and aggression being legitimate more highly than Pacifists. Additionally, Revenge-Seekers were more disrespect sensitive than were Pacifists, based on a measure of vigilance for signs of disrespect and expectations that others would disrespect them. Together these findings point to social-cognitive and emotion-related processes that may inhibit revenge-seeking in unambiguous provocation situations, even when children interpret the peer's behavior quite negatively.


PROVIDER: S-EPMC6053336 | BioStudies | 2018-01-01

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4332857 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7295117 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6950745 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6508975 | BioStudies
2009-01-01 | S-EPMC3019134 | BioStudies
2018-01-01 | S-EPMC6135395 | BioStudies
2017-01-01 | S-EPMC5296364 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC6535375 | BioStudies
2016-01-01 | S-EPMC7357577 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7262435 | BioStudies