Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Endotracheal tube-mounted camera-assisted intubation versus conventional intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomised trial (VivaITN).


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:For critically ill patients, effective airway management with a high first-attempt success rate for endotracheal intubation is essential to prevent hypoxic complications during securing of the airway. Video guidance may improve first-attempt success rate over direct laryngoscopy (DL). METHODS:With ethics approval, this randomised controlled trial involved 54 critically ill patients who received endotracheal intubation using a tube with an integrated video camera (VivaSight™-SL tube, VST, ETView Ltd., Misgav, Israel) or using conventional intubation under DL. RESULTS:The two groups did not differ in terms of intubation conditions. The first-attempt success rate was VST 96% vs. DL 93% (not statistically significant (n. s.)). When intubation at first attempt failed, it was successful in the second attempt in all patients. There was no difference in the median average time to intubation (VST 34 s (interquartile range 28-39) vs. DL 35 s (28-40), n. s.). Neither vomiting nor aspiration or accidental oesophageal intubation were observed in either group. The lowest pulsoxymetric oxygen saturation for VST was 96 (82-99) % vs. 99 (95-100) % for DL (n. s.). Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure?

SUBMITTER: Grensemann J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6151025 | BioStudies | 2018-01-01

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

2018-01-01 | S-EPMC6134434 | BioStudies
2014-01-01 | S-EPMC4902016 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC6089856 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6399974 | BioStudies
2016-01-01 | S-EPMC5591099 | BioStudies
2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4407430 | BioStudies
2016-01-01 | S-EPMC4873178 | BioStudies
2018-01-01 | S-EPMC6513507 | BioStudies
2016-01-01 | S-EPMC5203695 | BioStudies
2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4372550 | BioStudies