Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Impact of baseline COPD symptom severity on the benefit from dual versus mono-bronchodilators: an analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial.


ABSTRACT: RATIONALE:Symptom relief is a key treatment goal in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there are limited data available on the response to bronchodilator therapy in patients at low risk of exacerbations with different levels of symptom severity. This study compared treatment responses in patients with a range of symptom severities as indicated by baseline COPD assessment test (CAT) scores. METHODS:The 24-week EMAX trial evaluated the benefits of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium or salmeterol in symptomatic patients at low exacerbation risk who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. This analysis assessed lung function, symptoms, health status, and short-term deterioration outcomes in subgroups defined by a baseline CAT score [<20 (post hoc) and ?20 (pre-specified)]. Outcomes were also assessed using post hoc fractional polynomial modelling with continuous transformations of baseline CAT score covariates. RESULTS:Of the intent-to-treat population (n?=?2425), 56% and 44% had baseline CAT scores of <20 and ?20, respectively. Umeclidinium/vilanterol demonstrated favourable improvements compared with umeclidinium and salmeterol for the majority of outcomes irrespective of the baseline CAT score, with the greatest improvements generally observed in patients with CAT scores <20. Fractional polynomial analyses revealed consistent improvements in lung function, symptoms and reduction in rescue medication use with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol across a range of CAT scores, with the largest benefits seen in patients with CAT scores of approximately 10-21. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with symptomatic COPD benefit similarly from dual bronchodilator treatment with umeclidinium/vilanterol. Fractional polynomial analyses demonstrated the greatest treatment differences favouring dual therapy in patients with a CAT score <20, although benefits were seen up to scores of 30. This suggests that dual bronchodilation may be considered as initial therapy for patients across a broad range of symptom severities, not only those with severe symptoms (CAT ?20).Trial registration: NCT03034915, 2016-002513-22 (EudraCT number).The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

SUBMITTER: Vogelmeier CF 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7659027 | BioStudies | 2020-01-01

REPOSITORIES: biostudies

Similar Datasets

2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7579818 | BioStudies
2019-01-01 | S-EPMC6821007 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7278094 | BioStudies
2018-01-01 | S-EPMC5778187 | BioStudies
2015-01-01 | S-EPMC4279609 | BioStudies
1000-01-01 | S-EPMC6175098 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7444357 | BioStudies
2012-01-01 | S-EPMC3524248 | BioStudies
2017-01-01 | S-EPMC5599456 | BioStudies
2020-01-01 | S-EPMC7687787 | BioStudies