AACR Project GENIE
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: AACR Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) is an international pancancer registry of real-world data assembled through data sharing between 19 leading international cancer centers with the goal of improving clinical decision-making. The registry leverages ongoing clinical sequencing efforts (CLIA/ISO-certified) at participating cancer centers by pooling their data to create a novel, open-access registry to serve as an evidence base for the entire cancer community. Genomic and baseline clinical data from more than 70,000 tumors is accessible through the efforts of our strategic and technical partners, Sage Bionetworks and cBioPortal. The consortium and its activities are driven by openness, transparency, and inclusion to ensure that the project output remains accessible to the global cancer research community and ultimately benefits patients.
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA380294PRJNA380293
REPOSITORIES: dbGaP
Similar Datasets
Project description:A causal mediation analysis of DNA methylation as a mediator of nearby genetic association with Sjögren's syndrome using data collected from 131 female members of the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance registry, comprising of 64 Sjögren's syndrome cases and 67 non-cases.
2021-03-25 | GSE166373 | GEO
Project description:Cancer has no borders: Generation and analysis of molecular data across multiple centers worldwide is necessary to gain statistically significant clinical insights for the benefit of patients. Here we conceived and standardized a proteotype data generation and analysis workflow enabling distributed data generation and evaluated the quantitative data generated across laboratories of the international Cancer Moonshot consortium. Using harmonized mass spectrometry (MS) instrument platforms and standardized data acquisition procedures, we demonstrate robust, sensitive, and reproducible data generation across eleven international sites on seven consecutive days in a 24/7 operation mode. The data presented from the high-resolution MS1-based quantitative data-independent acquisition (HRMS1-DIA) workflow shows that coordinated proteotype data acquisition is feasible from clinical specimens using such standardized strategies. This work paves the way for the distributed multi-omic digitization of large clinical specimen cohorts across multiple sites as a prerequisite for turning molecular precision medicine into reality.
2020-02-18 | MSV000084976 | MassIVE
Project description:Genome wide DNA methylation profiling of human labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy samples obtained from 28 female members of the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) Registry. The Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform was used to obtain DNA methylation profiles across more than 450,000 highly informative CpG sites. Samples included 15 non-case glands, and 13 glands from patients with Sjögren's Syndrome.
2018-02-02 | GSE110007 | GEO
Project description:An International Multi-Center Study to Define the Clinical Utility of Microarray–Based Gene Expression Profiling in the Diagnosis and Sub-classification of Leukemia (MILE Study) Established in 2005, the MILE (Microarray Innovations in LEukemia) study research program included 11 participating centers in three continents. This cohort of n=1,152 samples represents data on the retrospective whole-genome analysis phase. This dataset is part of the MILE Study (Microarray Innovations In LEukemia) program, headed by the European Leukemia Network (ELN) and sponsored by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
2009-09-30 | GSE13164 | GEO
Project description:An International Multi-Center Study to Define the Clinical Utility of Microarray–Based Gene Expression Profiling in the Diagnosis and Sub-classification of Leukemia (MILE Study) Established in 2005, the MILE (Microarray Innovations in LEukemia) study research program included 11 participating centers in three continents. This cohort of n=2,096 samples represents data on the retrospective whole-genome analysis phase. This dataset is part of the MILE Study (Microarray Innovations In LEukemia) program, headed by the European Leukemia Network (ELN) and sponsored by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
2009-09-30 | GSE13159 | GEO
Project description:An International Multi-Center Study to Define the Clinical Utility of MicroarrayâBased Gene Expression Profiling in the Diagnosis and Sub-classification of Leukemia (MILE Study) Established in 2005, the MILE (Microarray Innovations in LEukemia) study research program included 11 participating centers in three continents. This cohort of n=1,152 samples represents data on the retrospective whole-genome analysis phase. This dataset is part of the MILE Study (Microarray Innovations In LEukemia) program, headed by the European Leukemia Network (ELN) and sponsored by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. 1,152 blood or bone marrow samples of acute and chronic leukemia patients were hybridized to the Roche AmpliChip Leukemia Custom Microarray
2010-05-23 | E-GEOD-13164 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:An International Multi-Center Study to Define the Clinical Utility of Microarray–Based Gene Expression Profiling in the Diagnosis and Sub-classification of Leukemia (MILE Study) Established in 2005, the MILE (Microarray Innovations in LEukemia) study research program included 11 participating centers in three continents. This cohort of n=2,096 samples represents data on the retrospective whole-genome analysis phase. This dataset is part of the MILE Study (Microarray Innovations In LEukemia) program, headed by the European Leukemia Network (ELN) and sponsored by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. 2096 blood or bone marrow samples of acute and chronic leukemia patients were hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChips.
2009-09-30 | E-GEOD-13159 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This pilot trial study uses a structural support program for adoption of cancer screening interventions at a rural community-based organization. Rural communities face unique barriers in implementation of evidence-based interventions due to a lack of infrastructure, community capacity, and expertise as academic and research centers are often clustered in urban areas. The support program may help a rural community-based organization select, adapt, and implement cancer prevention and control evidence-based interventions.
| 2325433 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:After therapy for prostate cancer many men develop a rising PSA. Such men may develop a local or metastatic recurrence that warrants further therapy. However many men will have no evidence of disease progression other than the rising PSA and will have a good outcome. A case-control design, incorporating test and validation cohorts, was used to test the association of gene expression results with outcome after PSA recurrence. Since clinical training and validation analysis requires tissue from patients with sufficient follow-up time, for this study we sampled individuals from the Mayo Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (RRP) Registry. The registry consists of a population of men who received prostatectomy as their first treatment for prostate cancer at the Mayo Clinic (For a current description and use of the registry; see PMID: 17418069). As systemic progression is relatively infrequent, we designed a case-control study nested within a cohort of men with a rising PSA. Between 1987-2001, inclusive, 9,989 previously-untreated men had RRP at Mayo. On follow-up, 2,131 developed a rising PSA (>30 days after RRP) in the absence of concurrent clinical recurrence. PSA rise was defined as a follow-up PSA >= 0.20 ng/ml, with the next PSA at least 0.05 ng/ml higher or the initiation of treatment for PSA recurrence (for patients whose follow-up PSA was high enough to warrant treatment). This group of 2,131 men comprises the underlying cohort from which SYS cases and PSA controls were selected. Within 5 years of PSA rise, 213 men developed systemic progression (SYS cases), defined as a positive bone scan or CT scan. Of these, 100 men succumbed to a prostate cancer-specific death, 37 died from other causes and 76 remain at risk. PSA recurrence controls (213) were selected from those men without systemic progression within 5 years after the PSA rise and were matched (1:1) on birth year, calendar year of PSA rise and initial diagnostic pathologic Gleason score (<=6, 7+). Twenty of these men developed systemic progression greater than 5 years after initial PSA rise and 9 succumbed to a prostate cancer-specific death. A set of 213 No Evidence of Disease (NED) Progression controls were also selected from the Mayo RRP Registry of 9,989 men and used for some comparisons. These controls had RRP from 1987-1998 with no evidence of PSA rise within 7 years of RRP. The median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up from RRP was 11.3 (9.3, 13.8) years. The NED controls were matched to the systemic progression cases on birth-year, calendar year of RRP and initial diagnostic Gleason Score. Computerized optimal matching was performed to minimize the total distance between cases and controls in terms of the sum of the absolute difference in the matching factors (PMID: 8728456). All paraffin-embedded blocks from eligible men were identified and each block was surveyed for the tissue present (primary and secondary Gleason cancer regions, normal and metastatic lymph nodes, etc.). Of the 639 eligible patients, paraffin blocks were available on 623 (97.5%). Similarly, RNA was successfully isolated and the DASL assays successfully performed on a very high proportion of patients/specimens: Usable RNA was prepared from all 623 blocks, and the Cancer Panel and custom prostate cancer panel DASL arrays were both successful on 596 RNA specimens (95.7% of RNAs; 93.3% of design patients). Keywords: outcome prediction 596 total cases (n=200, 201, 195 for systemic disease progression, PSA recurrence and no evidence of disease groups).
2008-06-09 | E-GEOD-10645 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:<p>The International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays (ISCA) Consortium is a rapidly growing group of clinical cytogenetics and molecular genetics laboratories committed to improving quality of patient care related to clinical genetic testing using new molecular cytogenetic technologies including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative SNP analysis by microarrays or bead chip technology. The ISCA Consortium is now working with the sequencing community to extend the goals of standardization, collaboration, and data sharing. To reflect this combined effort, we are becoming ICCG, or the International Collaboration for Clinical Genomics.</p> <p>Efforts of the Consortium include:</p> <p><b>Clinical Utility:</b> The ISCA Consortium has made recommendations regarding the appropriate clinical indications for cytogenetic array testing (Miller et al. AJHG 2010, PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20466091" target="_blank">20466091</a>). Currently, discussions are focused on pediatric applications for children with unexplained developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism and other developmental disabilities. A separate committee has been developed to address appropriate cancer genetic applications (<a href="http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/ccmc/" target="_blank">http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/ccmc/</a>).</p> <p><b>Evidence-based standards for cytogenomic array design:</b> The Consortium will develop recommendations for standards for the design, resolution and content of cytogenomic arrays using an evidence-based process and an international panel of experts in clinical genetics, clinical laboratory genetics (cytogenetics and molecular genetics), genomics and bioinformatics. This design is intended to be platform and vendor-neutral (common denominator is genome sequence coordinates), and is a dynamic process with input from the broader genetics community and evidence-based review by the expert panel (a Steering Committee with international representation).</p> <p><b>Public Database for clinical and research community:</b> It is essential that a publicly available database be created and maintained for cytogenetic array data generated in clinical testing laboratories. This will be integrated into the current dbGaP database at NCBI/NIH and released through dbVar, and curated by a committee of clinical genetics laboratory experts. The very high quality of copy number data (i.e., deletions and duplications) coming from clinical laboratories combined with expert curation will produce an invaluable resource to the clinical and research communities.</p> <p><b>Standards for interpretation of cytogenetic array results:</b> Using the ISCA Database, along with other genomic and genetics databases, the Consortium will develop recommendations for the interpretation and reporting of pathogenic vs. benign copy number changes as well as imbalances of uncertain clinical significance.</p> <p><b>Membership</b> in the ISCA Consortium is open to all individuals and laboratories involved in cytogenetic array testing who are committed to free data sharing and to participation in a process to develop evidence-based standards and guidelines to improve patient care.</p> <p><b>ISCA is available through dbVar:</b><br/> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd37/" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd37/</a><br/> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd75/" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd75/</a><br/> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd45/" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd45/</a><br/> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd101/" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/studies/nstd101/</a><br/> </p>
| phs000205 | dbGaP