Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

8 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Effect of Peer support, Remote, on subjective well-being in patients with colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT: Intervention 1: Intervention group: The intervention group is subjected to peer support interventions for one month, at least twice a week by phone, and at least weekly by the Internet (virtual network) at least once a week. Intervention 2: The control group receives the same routine care and there is no intervention in it. Primary outcome(s): Subjective well-being Score, in the Warwick Edinburgh Questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention and one month after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Warwick Edinburgh subjective well-being Questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Supportive, Randomization description: Patients are randomly assigned to two groups of intervention and control (using the random numbers table at www.randomization.com), Blinding description: The analyst will be unaware of the intervention and control groups and the data collected and which group it relates to.

DISEASE(S): C18-20,Malignant Neoplasm Of Colon. C19 Malignant Neoplasm Of Rectosigmoid Junction. C20 Malignant Neoplasm Of Rectum,Colorectal Cancer

PROVIDER: 2498403 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Evaluation of Rheum ribes L. aqueous extract effect on neuropathy

Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients randomly enter the intervention group, and use 5 ml of the prescribed extract for 7 days from the second day of chemotherapy until the seventh course of chemotherapy. Intervention 2: Control group: Patients randomly enter the control group, and use 5 ml of the placebo for 7 days from the second day of chemotherapy until the seventh course of chemotherapy. Primary outcome(s): . Peripheral neuropathy. Timepoint: End of day 7 after each chemotherapy course until the seventh term of chemotherapy. Method of measurement: questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: Double blind, Blinding description: Double blind.

| 2484005 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The effect of family-centered empowerment model on self-care ability

Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group (family-centered empowerment model): The members will receive 3 to 5 sessions of education based on family-centered empowerment model, which covers four stages: awareness and cognition, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and evaluation. Education will be delivered in groups of 5 using group discussion. Intervention 2: Control group: The control group will not receive a specific educational intervention. Primary outcome(s): Self-care ability. Timepoint: before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and one month after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: researcher-made self-care ability assessment questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Randomization description: The participants will be allocated into experimental and control groups using the table of random numbers.

| 2497141 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Circulating microRNA as potential diagnostic biomarkers for sleep disorder

Project description:Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was carried out on subjects who visited an oriental medicine clinic due to recurrent sleep disturbance, and 40 individuals (17 male and 23 female) were set as the sleep diorder (SD) group based on their scores on the sleep distrurbance questionnaire of Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI). The control group consisted of 40 healthy individuals (20 males and females each), as assessed by both subjective diagnosis and test for metabolic syndrome factors.Ten individuals (five males and females each) from the SD and the control group, respectively, were allocated for NGS analysis.

2021-07-07 | GSE165041 | GEO

The effect of virtual education and support on nutrition of patient with colorectal cancer

Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: they receive educational content in form of educational text messages (2 to 3 messages), audio messages, images and related videos (8 am to 8 pm daily) for one month through a virtual social network. After sending the messages, the participants are requested to send the sentence the message has been read to the researcher at the end of the day after reading the messages. In addition, to ensure the participants understanding of the concept of the sent educational content , at the end of each week, patients were asked 2 to 3 questions about the sent content. Intervention 2: Control group: They received the routine education of the hospital. After one month and after completing the questionnaires, the nutrition educational booklet was also provided to the control group. Primary outcome(s): Nutritional status score with PG-SGA questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention) and one month after the educational intervention. Method of measurement: Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Randomization description: Recruiting was done when patients went to the hospital and clinic for chemotherapy. Then the samples were randomly divided into two groups of 40 people with random allocation in the intervention (A) and control (B) groups. At first, the blocks of four were defined as follows: ABAB, BBAA, BABA, BAAB, AABB , ABBA, etc. and were placed in the envelope and numbered. The blocks were determined using a table of random numbers, and people were placed in two intervention and control groups according to A and B. Patient A was placed in the supportive educational intervention group through virtual social networks and patient B was placed in the control group.

| 24650 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Colonoscopy Screening Test

Project description:Intervention 1: In the pre-test, the questionnaire was provided to intervention group. After recognizing that the individuals in the intervention group were in the process of fear control of or threat control, educational content was delivered.Educational intervention content was provided to the intervention group to change that threat control and fear control with items to raise awareness of people about Colo-rectal cancer, risk factors and prevention and specially colonoscopy screening through lecture, pamphlets, booklets,film, posters, and text messages.Three months after the educational intervention in intervention group, post-test was repeated in intervention group . Intervention 2: Control group: In the pre-test, the questionnaire was provided to control group.Control group didn’t receive educational intervention .After three months the educational intervention in intervention group , post-test was repeated in control group. Finally, the educational content packages were also given to the control group. Primary outcome(s): Colonoscopy from %10 to %30. Timepoint: Pre educational intervention , 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Researcher- made questionnaire based on construction of Extended Process Parallel Model , Kim Witte. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention, Randomization description: After selecting the eligible samples regarding the randomly assigned tables, the participants were divided into two groups of intervention and the control and the educational intervention was conducted in the intervention group.

| 2492986 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The Effect of Theory-Based Education on promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behavior in People 69-50Years Old

Project description:Intervention 1: In the intervention group, the educational intervention was based on the model of health belief and needs assessment, which was done before the training and using valid books and educational booklets and the latest instructions issued by the Ministry of Health and appropriate to the level of literacy of learners and based on adult education. Health belief model structures will be prepared, developed and implemented. Intervention 2: Control group: The control group will receive routine training from health centers. Primary outcome(s): Awareness. Timepoint: Before intervention and 1 month after educational intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Colorectal cancer screening behavior. Timepoint: Before intervention and 1 and 3 month after educational intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Other design features: In this study, in addition to the constructs of the health belief model, behavioral intent and screening behavior are also investigated, Randomization description: Block Random Method will be used to assign eligible people to two groups. The size of the blocks is 4 and 6. Randomization will be done individually. In the Block Method, due to the use of different combinations in each block, it is not possible to predict the randomization sequence, so the concealment process will also be observed. For the guaranteed encryption process, the randomization files are generated in Excel and will remain close to the epidemiologist’s colleague, then the Epidemiologist will be contacted to allocate the eligible people to two groups, the sick person, and to position each person in the groups, will be decided according to the randomization sequ

| 2755483 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The effect of a care program based on Roy adaptation model of nursing in colorectal cancer patients

Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: Roy follow-up care model. Intervention 2: Control group: Chemotherapy and routine nursing and medical care that are applied on a daily basis, and does not receive a training program based on the Roy adaptation pattern. Primary outcome(s): The severity of depression, anxiety and stress. Timepoint: First and 2 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Roy review And recognition form and anxiety scale, depression, stress DASS-21. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Other, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Randomization description: Blocks randomization method was used to allocate individuals to groups, Blinding description: the allocation of patients to the groups was done by a nurse in the department that have no information about the treatment of A or B group. (Hiding random allocation and staying out of the intervention group).

| 2488886 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparison Between Melatonin and Zolpidem in Improving Sleep quality, Anxiety and Depression

Project description:Intervention 1: intervention: 6 mg melatonin every night for 30 days. Intervention 2: control: 10 mg zolpidem at night for 30 days.;Treatment - Drugs;Treatment - Drugs;intervention: 6 mg melatonin every night for 30 days;control: 10 mg zolpidem at night for 30 days Primary outcome(s): Sleep quality. Timepoint: At baseline, 1 month after the baseline and 2 months after baseline. Method of measurement: Pittsburgh Questionnaire.;Sleep quality. Timepoint: At baseline, 2 weeks and 1 month after the baseline and 2 months after baseline. Method of measurement: GSQS Questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment.

| 2488847 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Different anastomosis procedures in rectal cancer

Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group1: Coloanal End to End Anastomosis. Intervention 2: Intervention group 2: Side to End Anastomosis. Intervention 3: Intervention group 3: J poach coloanal anastomosis. Primary outcome(s): Surgery period. Timepoint: onset to end of anesthesia. Method of measurement: Minute.;Hospital Stay. Timepoint: Discharge Time. Method of measurement: day.;Blood Loss. Timepoint: ?End of surgery. Method of measurement: CC. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention, Randomization description: Simple randomization of individual by randomly drawing sealed envelopes, using a computer-based table of randomization by a surgical assistant, Blinding description: In this single-blind study, the participants were not familiar with three types of anastomosis surgery in this study. In addition, the observer, who completed the questionnaire, was not familiar with the groups. Similarly, the data analyzer did not know the study groups. However, the main researcher (surgeon) was informed about the groups, and all surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The safety and data monitoring committee was also informed about the study groups.

| 2485057 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Vitamin E in onoxaliplatin-induced neuropathy prevention

Project description:Intervention 1: in intervention group :vitamin E 400 mg daily. Intervention 2: Control group were observed.;Prevention;in intervention group :vitamin E 400 mg daily;Control group were observed Primary outcome(s): Peripheral neuropathy. Timepoint: before study and then 3 months later. Method of measurement: questionnaire. Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention.

| 2485714 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data