Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

76 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Clinical study of robot assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery

ABSTRACT: Interventions: Robot assisted surgery Primary outcome(s): rate of adverse event Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Malignant Diseases

PROVIDER: 2630696 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Robot (Da Vinci) -assisted colorectal surgery

Project description:Interventions: Robot-assisted colorectal surgery using da Vinci Surgical System will be performed. Primary outcome(s): operation time, blood loss Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2632402 | ecrin-mdr-crc

A Feasibility Study of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancers

Project description:Interventions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic operation using "da Vinci Surgical System" will be performed. Primary outcome(s): Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity rate, Ro resection rate Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2628839 | ecrin-mdr-crc

A phase ll study of robot assisted colorectal cancer surgery

Project description:Interventions: robot assisted surgery Primary outcome(s): rate of anastomotic leakage Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2622324 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The effectiveness and safety of robot assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery by da Vinci Si Surgical System.

Project description:Interventions: robot assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery Primary outcome(s): rate of the incidence of postoperative complications further than Grade 3 of Clavien-Dindo classification ver2.0. Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2632340 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Project description:Laparoscopic surgery is applied today worldwide to most digestive procedures. In some of them, such as cholecystectomy, Nissen's fundoplication or obesity surgery, laparoscopy has become the standard in practice. In others, such as colon or gastric resection, the laparoscopic approach is frequently used and its usefulness is unquestionable. More complex procedures, such as esophageal, liver or pancreatic resections are, however, more infrequently performed, due to the high grade of skill necessary. As a result, there is less clinical evidence to support its implementation. In the recent years, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly applied, again with little evidence for comparison with the conventional laparoscopic approach. This review will focus on the complex digestive procedures as well as those whose use in standard practice could be more controversial. Also novel robot-assisted procedures will be updated.

| S-EPMC4726673 | biostudies-other

A pilot study of robot assisted colorectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci Si surgical system

Project description:Interventions: robot-assisted colorectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci Si Surgical System Primary outcome(s): The conversion rate to open surgery Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2649321 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.

Project description:BackgroundSurgeons are among the most at risk of work-related musculoskeletal health decline because of the physical demands of surgery, which is also associated with cognitive fatigue. Minimally invasive surgery offers excellent benefits to patients but the impact of robotic or laparoscopic surgery on surgeon well-being is less well understood. This work examined the musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery.MethodsMedline, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for 'Muscle strain' AND 'musculoskeletal fatigue' AND 'occupational diseases' OR 'cognitive fatigue' AND 'mental fatigue' OR 'standard laparoscopic surgery' AND 'robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery'. Primary outcomes measured were electromyographic (EMG) activity for musculoskeletal fatigue and questionnaires (NASA-TLX, SMEQ, or Borg CR-10) for cognitive fatigue. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) Guidelines. The study was preregistered on Prospero ID: CRD42020184881.ResultsTwo hundred and ninety-eight original titles were identified. Ten studies that were all observational studies were included in the systematic review. EMG activity was consistently lower in robotic than in laparoscopic surgery in the erector spinae and flexor digitorum muscles but higher in the trapezius muscle. This was associated with significantly lower cognitive load in robotic than laparoscopic surgery in 7 of 10 studies.ConclusionsEvidence suggests a reduction in musculoskeletal demands during robotic surgery in muscles excluding the trapezius, and this is associated with most studies reporting a reduced cognitive load. Robotic surgery appears to have less negative cognitive and musculoskeletal impact on surgeons compared to laparoscopic surgery.

| S-EPMC9296389 | biostudies-literature

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial for hand assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer

Project description:Interventions: Group 1:hand-assisted laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer;Group 2:laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer;Group 3:robot-assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer Primary outcome(s): height;weight;Surgical incision length;operation time;Intraoperative blood loss;Number of lymph nodes detected after operation;First exhaust time after surgery;Postoperative hospital stay;Postoperative complication rate;Reoperation rate;Mortality within 30 days after surgery;Intraoperative cost;Local recurrence rate;Disease free survival;Overall survival rate;Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy rate;First time out of bed after surgery;Time of first postoperative feeding;Time of first urethral catheter extraction after operation;The first time pulling drainage tube after surgery;Tumor staging and typing;Tumor site;Preoperative tumor markers;ASA sizing Study Design: Parallel

| 2683257 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Feasibility study of robot assisted colorectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci surgical system

Project description:Interventions: Laparoscopic rectal surgery using da Vinci surgical system Primary outcome(s): Adverse event rate Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2632792 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Project description:ImportanceThis review provides a comprehensive comparison of treatment outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) based on randomly-controlled trials (RCTs).ObjectivesWe employed RCTs to provide a systematic review that will enable the relevant community to weigh the effectiveness and efficacy of surgical robotics in controversial fields on surgical procedures both overall and on each individual surgical procedure.Evidence reviewA search was conducted for RCTs in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 1981 to 2016. Among a total of 1,517 articles, 27 clinical reports with a mean sample size of 65 patients per report (32.7 patients who underwent RLS and 32.5 who underwent CLS), met the inclusion criteria.FindingsCLS shows significant advantages in total operative time, net operative time, total complication rate, and operative cost (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas the estimated blood loss was less in RLS (p < 0.05). As subgroup analyses, conversion rate on colectomy and length of hospital stay on hysterectomy statistically favors RLS (p < 0.05).ConclusionsDespite higher operative cost, RLS does not result in statistically better treatment outcomes, with the exception of lower estimated blood loss. Operative time and total complication rate are significantly more favorable with CLS.

| S-EPMC5779699 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data