Project description:ObjectivesTo explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of urticaria patients regarding the medication treatment.Methods designA cross-sectional study.SettingAt the Dermatology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from 15 June 2023 to 12 March 2024.ParticipantsUrticaria patients.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was KAP of urticaria patients using a self-administered questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with KAP.ResultsA total of 497 valid responses were collected. Of these respondents, 333 (67.0%) were female, and 375 (75.5%) lived in urban areas. The median KAP scores were 1.00 [0.00, 3.00] (possible range: 0-8), 23.00 [18.00, 26.00] (possible range: 10-50) and 32.00 [31.00, 36.00] (possible range: 8-40), respectively. Most patients (91.7%) clearly needed to understand the aetiology and treatment process related to urticaria. Less than half (43.5%) of patients believed that their healthcare providers offered comprehensive information about the knowledge and procedures related to urticaria medication. Demographic analysis uncovered substantial variations in knowledge and attitude scores across different education levels, age groups, occupations and residential areas (p<0.001 for all). In contrast, the impact on practice scores was less significant, particularly concerning educational diversity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher knowledge score (OR=1.17, 95% CI: [1.03 to 1.33], p=0.014) and age between 35-65 years (OR=1.78, 95% CI: [1.16 to 2.74], p=0.009) were independently associated with proactive practices.ConclusionUrticaria patients exhibit insufficient knowledge, unfavourable attitudes and proactive practices concerning medication treatment. Enhancing patient education and targeted interventions are essential to improve the knowledge and attitudes towards medication treatment, ultimately promoting better self-management practices among urticaria patients.

Project description:IntroductionHospital readmissions are common, expensive, and a key target of the Medicare Value Based Purchasing (VBP) program. Risk assessment tools have been developed to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission so they can be targeted for interventions aimed at reducing the rate of readmission. One such tool is the HOSPITAL score that uses seven readily available clinical variables to predict the risk of readmission within 30 days of discharge. The HOSPITAL score has been internationally validated in large academic medical centers. This study aims to determine if the HOSPITAL score is similarly useful in a moderate sized university affiliated hospital in the midwestern United States.Materials and methodsAll adult medical patients discharged from the SIU-SOM Hospitalist service from Memorial Medical Center (MMC) from October 15, 2015 to March 16, 2016, were studied retrospectively to determine if the HOSPITAL score was a significant predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days.ResultsDuring the study period, 998 discharges were recorded for the hospitalist service. The analysis includes data for the 931 discharges. Patients who died during the hospital stay, were transferred to another hospital, or left against medical advice were excluded. Of these patients, 109 (12%) were readmitted to the same hospital within 30 days. The patients who were readmitted were more likely to have a length of stay greater than or equal to 5 days (55% vs. 41%, p = 0.005) and were more likely to have been admitted more than once to the hospital within the last year (100% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic evaluation of the HOSPITAL score for this patient population shows a C statistic of 0.77 (95% CI [0.73-0.81]), indicating good discrimination for hospital readmission. The Brier score for the HOSPITAL score in this setting was 0.10, indicating good overall performance. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test shows a χ (2) value of 1.63 with a p value of 0.20.DiscussionThis single center retrospective study indicates that the HOSPITAL score has good discriminatory ability to predict hospital readmissions within 30 days for a medical hospitalist service at a university-affiliated hospital. This data for all causes of hospital readmission is comparable to the discriminatory ability of the HOSPITAL score in the international validation study (C statistics of 0.72 vs. 0.77) conducted at considerably larger hospitals (975 average beds vs. 507 at MMC) for potentially avoidable hospital readmissions.ConclusionsThe internationally validated HOSPITAL score may be a useful tool in moderate sized community hospitals to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission within 30 days. This easy to use scoring system using readily available data can be used as part of interventional strategies to reduce the rate of hospital readmission.

Project description:IntroductionHospital readmissions are common, expensive, and a key target of the Medicare Value Based Purchasing (VBP) program. Validated risk assessment tools such as the HOSPITAL score and LACE index have been developed to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission so they can be targeted for interventions aimed at reducing the rate of readmission. This study aims to evaluate the utility of HOSPITAL score and LACE index for predicting hospital readmission within 30 days in a moderate-sized university affiliated hospital in the midwestern United States.Materials and methodsAll adult medical patients who underwent one or more ICD-10 defined procedures discharged from the SIU-SOM Hospitalist service from Memorial Medical Center (MMC) from October 15, 2015 to March 16, 2016, were studied retrospectively to determine if the HOSPITAL score and LACE index were a significant predictors of hospital readmission within 30 days.ResultsDuring the study period, 463 discharges were recorded for the hospitalist service. The analysis includes data for the 432 discharges. Patients who died during the hospital stay, were transferred to another hospital, or left against medical advice were excluded. Of these patients, 35 (8%) were readmitted to the same hospital within 30 days. A receiver operating characteristic evaluation of the HOSPITAL score for this patient population shows a C statistic of 0.75 (95% CI [0.67-0.83]), indicating good discrimination for hospital readmission. The Brier score for the HOSPITAL score in this setting was 0.069, indicating good overall performance. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test shows a χ2 value of 3.71 with a p value of 0.59. A receiver operating characteristic evaluation of the LACE index for this patient population shows a C statistic of 0.58 (95% CI [0.48-0.68]), indicating poor discrimination for hospital readmission. The Brier score for the LACE index in this setting was 0.082, indicating good overall performance. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test shows a χ2 value of 4.97 with a p value of 0.66.DiscussionThis single center retrospective study indicates that the HOSPITAL score has superior discriminatory ability when compared to the LACE index as a predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days at a medium-sized university-affiliated teaching hospital.ConclusionsThe internationally validated HOSPITAL score may be superior to the LACE index in moderate-sized community hospitals to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission within 30 days.

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to report the experience of robotic-assisted cardiac surgery (RACS) using the Da Vinci robotic surgical system, meanwhile its efficacy and safety was also evaluated by comparing with traditional open-heart surgery (TOHS), thus to provide evidence for a broader application of RACS in clinical practice.MethodsFrom July 2017 to May 2022, a total of 255 patients who underwent cardiac surgery assisted by Da Vinci robotic surgery system in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, which included 134 males with an average age of 52.6±6.3 years and 121 females with an average age of 51.8±5.4 years. They were defined as the RACS group. By searching the hospital's electronic medical record information system, 736 patients with the same disease types who underwent median sternotomy and had complete data in the same period were selected as the TOHS group. Intra- and postoperative clinical results of the both groups were compared, and we focused the following indices including surgery time, reoperation rate for postoperative bleeding, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative hospitalization day, the number of died and withdrawing treatments, and the time of patients back to normal daily activities after discharge.ResultsIn RACS group, 2 patients were scheduled to undergo mitral valvuloplasty (MVP), but they had to change to mitral valve replacement (MVR) due to unsatisfactory results; furthermore, 1 patient who received atrial septal defect (ASD) repair experienced abdominal hemorrhage because a rupture of abdominal aorta which were induced by the femoral arterial cannulation, and this patient eventually died of invalid rescue. As for the comparison of clinical results between both groups, there were no significant statistical differences in reoperation rate for postoperative bleeding, and the number of died and withdrawing treatments between both groups. However, length ICU stay, postoperative hospitalization day, and the time of patients back to normal daily activities after discharge was lower in RACS group in addition to the surgery time.ConclusionsCompared with TOHS, RACS is safe and effective in clinical and is worthy of promotion in an appropriate place.

Dataset Information

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets