Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Performance comparison of Affymetrix and Illumina microarray technologies_IlluminaDataSet

ABSTRACT: The present study was conducted to compare the ability of Affymetrix and Illumina microarray technologies to characterize the differential gene expression profiles of human monocytes and monocyte-derived-macrophages. Keywords: Cross-platform comparison

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE10213 | GEO | 2008/06/27

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA109007

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Performance comparison of Affymetrix and Illumina microarray technologies_AffymetrixDataset

Project description:The present study was conducted to compare the ability of Affymetrix and Illumina microarray technologies to characterize the differential gene expression profiles of human monocytes and monocyte-derived-macrophages. Keywords: Type Cross-platform comparison Summary

2008-06-27 | GSE11430 | GEO

Performance comparison of Affymetrix and Illumina microarray technologies

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2008-06-27 | GSE11540 | GEO

Compared performance of Affymetrix HTA arrays and Illumina RNAseq for the analysis of tumours [Affymetrix]

Project description:Here we compared the performance of Affymetrix HTA 2.0 microarray and Illumina 2000 RNA-sequencing techniques on the clinical samples collected from patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.

2017-06-09 | GSE84784 | GEO

Microarray expression data from circulating blood monocytes

Project description:Cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens is carried out by classical DCs (cDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs), but whether a similar or distinct program exists for this process is unknown. In examining this issue, we discovered that only Ly-6ChiTremL4– monocytes, but not Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes, can differentiate into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs in response to GM-CSF and IL-4. However, Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes were committed to Nur77-dependent development of Ly-6CloTremL4+ monocytes. Further, differentiation of monocytes with GM-CSF required addition of IL-4 to generate Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs that cross-presented as efficiently as CD24+ cDCs, which was accompanied by increased Batf3 and Irf4 expression. Unlike cDCs, Mo-DCs required only IRF4, and not Batf3, for cross-presentation. Further, Irf4–/– monocytes failed to develop into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs, and instead developed into macrophages. Thus, cDCs and Mo-DCs use distinct transcriptional programs for cross-presentation that may drive different antigen-processing pathways. These differences may influence development of therapeutic DC vaccines based on Mo-DCs.

2016-05-25 | GSE75013 | GEO

Microarray expression data from monocytes, Mo-DCs and CD24 DCs

2016-05-25 | GSE75012 | GEO

Microarray expression data from WT and IRF4 KO Sirp-a+ DCs

2016-05-25 | GSE75014 | GEO

Relative impact of key sources of systematic noise in Affymetrix and Illumina gene-expression microarray experiments.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC3269440 | biostudies-literature

Compared performance of Affymetrix HTA arrays and Illumina RNAseq for the analysis of tumours [RNA-seq]

2017-06-09 | GSE84776 | GEO

Dillution series comparison of Affymetrix and Illumina Expression Platforms

Project description:The growth in popularity of RNA expression microarrays has been accompanied by concerns about the reliability of the data especially when comparing between different platforms. Here we present an evaluation of the reproducibility of microarray results using two platforms, Affymetrix GeneChips and Illumina BeadArrays. The study design is based on a dilution series of two human tissues (blood and placenta), tested in duplicate on each platform. By a variety of measures the two platforms yielded data of similar quality and properties. The results of a comparison between the platforms indicate very high agreement, particularly for genes which are predicted to be differentially expressed between the two tissues. Agreement was strongly correlated with the level of expression of a gene. Concordance was also improved when probes on the two platforms could be identified as being likely to target the same set of transcripts of a given gene. These results shed light on the causes or failures of agreement across microarray platforms. The set of probes we found to be most highly reproducible can be used by others to help increase confidence in analyses of other data sets using these platforms. Keywords: Dilution series, platform comparison, Affymetrix, Illumina

2005-11-08 | GSE3077 | GEO

Combining Affymetrix microarray results.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC1274254 | biostudies-literature