Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Benchmarking of 4C-seq pipelines based on real and simulated data

ABSTRACT: With its capacity for high-resolution data output in one region of interest, chromosome conformation capture combined with high-throughput sequencing (4C-seq) is a state-of-the-art next-generation sequencing technique that provides epigenetic insights, and regularly advances current medical research. However, 4C-seq data is complex and prone to biases, and while specialized programs exist, an unbiased, extensive benchmarking is still lacking. Furthermore, neither substantial datasets with fully characterized ground truth, nor simulation programs for realistic 4C-seq data have been published. We conducted a benchmarking study on 54 4C-seq samples from 12 datasets, including original murine BMM, T-cell, and 416B data, and developed a novel 4C-seq simulation software to allow for more detailed comparisons of 4C-seq algorithms on 50 simulated datasets with 10 to 120 samples each.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE123131 | GEO | 2019/05/29

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Benchmarking dataset for measurement and removal of index hopping artifacts in multiplexed droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq data

Project description:Sample index hopping refers to the incorrect sample assignment of a demultiplexed sequencing read in a library pool. To enable benchmarking of methods for measurement of index hopping rate and removal of its artifacts in single-cell RNA-seq data, we developed a validation dataset consisting of a multiplexed library of two samples, in which the true sample of origin of most reads are known. The reads with known sample of origin provide the ground truth for measuring the performance of index hopping correcting methods.

2020-05-09 | GSE149087 | GEO

Benchmarking of 4C-seq pipelines based on real and simulated data

Project description:Benchmarking of 4C-seq pipelines based on real and simulated data

| PRJNA507614 | ENA

FloChIP TF benchmarking data

Project description:FloChIP TF benchmarking data

| PRJEB35684 | ENA

iiCLIP protocol benchmarking with PTBP1

Project description:We describe an improved individual nucleotide resolution CLIP protocol (iiCLIP), which can be completed within 4 days from UV crosslinking to libraries for sequencing. For benchmarking, we directly compared PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries with the iCLIP2 protocol produced under standardised conditions with 1 million HEK293 cells, and with public eCLIP and iCLIP PTBP1 data. There are 3 PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries, 1 input iiCLIP library and 1 PTBP1 iCLIP2 library produced in this study.

2022-08-01 | E-MTAB-10881 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Benchmarking DIA data analysis workflows

Project description:Data independent acquisition (DIA) has become a well-established method in LC-MS driven proteomics. Nonetheless, there are still a lot of possibilities at the data analysis level. By benchmarking different DIA analysis workflows through a ground truth sample mimicking real differential abundance samples, consisting of a differential spike-in of UPS2 in a constant yeast background, we provide a roadmap for DIA data analysis of shotgun samples based on whether sensitivity, precision or accuracy is of the essence. Three different commonly used DIA software tools (DIA-NN, EncyclopeDIA and SpectronautTM) were tested in both spectral library mode and spectral library free mode. In spectral library mode we used the independent spectral library prediction tools Prosit and MS2PIP together with DeepLC, next to the classical DDA-based spectral libraries. In total we benchmarked 12 DIA workflows. DIA-NN in library free mode or using in silico predicted libraries shows the highest sensitivity maintaining a high reproducibility and accuracy.

2024-05-06 | PXD044981 | Pride

RiboReport - Benchmarking ribosome profiling based identification of open reading frames in bacteria.

Project description:Generation of a Ribo-seq dataset for E. coli MG1655 for benchmarking Ribo-seq analysis tools

2022-05-20 | GSE131514 | GEO

Benchmarking of RNA-sequencing analysis workflows using whole-transcriptome RT-qPCR expression data

Project description:RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard for whole-transcriptome gene expression quantification. Multiple algorithms have been developed to derive gene counts from sequencing reads. While a number of benchmarking studies have been conducted, the question remains how individual methods perform at accurately quantifying gene expression levels from RNA-sequencing reads. We performed an independent benchmarking study using RNA-sequencing data from the well established MAQCA and MAQCB reference samples. RNA-sequencing reads were processed using five popular workflows (Tophat-HTSeq, Tophat-Cufflinks, STAR-HTSeq, Kallisto and Salmon) and resulting gene expression measurements were compared to expression data generated by wet-lab validated qPCR assays for all protein coding genes. All methods showed high gene expression rank correlations with qPCR data. When comparing gene expression fold changes between MAQCA and MAQCB samples, about 85% of the genes showed consistent results between RNA-sequencing and qPCR data. Of note, each method revealed a small but specific set of genes with inconsistent expression measurements. A significant proportion of these method-specific inconsistent genes were reproducibly identified in independent datasets. These genes were typically smaller, had fewer exons and were lower expressed compared to genes with consistent expression measurements. We propose that careful validation is warranted when evaluating RNA-seq based expression profiles for this specific set of genes.

2017-01-31 | GSE83402 | GEO

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods (Cel_Seq)

Project description:Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology has undergone rapid development in recent years and brings new challenges in data processing and analysis. This has led to an explosion of tailored analysis methods for scRNA-seq to address various biological questions. However, the current lack of gold-standard benchmarking datasets makes it difficult for researchers to evaluate the performance of the many methods available in a systematic manner. Here, we designed and generated a cross-platform benchmark dataset that has in-built truth in various forms and varying levels of biological noise. We used this dataset to compare different protocols and data analysis methods. We found that different protocols have different data quality and ERCC spike-in works independently to endogenous RNA. We found significant differences in the results from the methods compared and we associated the results with data characteristics to identify methods that perform well in different situations. Our dataset and analysis provide a valuable resource for algorithm selection in different biological settings.

2018-08-18 | GSE118704 | GEO

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods [5 Cell Lines Cel-seq]

2019-02-22 | GSE126908 | GEO

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods [5 Cell Lines 10X]

2019-02-22 | GSE126906 | GEO