Dataset Information

Switching from Random to Imprinted X-inactivation by Maternal PRC2

ABSTRACT: Imprinted X-inactivation is a paradigm of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals and silences genes exclusively on the paternally-inherited X-chromosome. Here, we test the hypothesis that oocyte-derived maternal Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) protein EED orchestrates the selective inactivation of the paternal-X in mouse embryos. In maternal Eed null (Eedm-/-) but not zygotic Eed null female and male embryos, the maternal X-chromosome ectopically induced Xist lncRNA, which silences X-linked genes. Subsequently, Xist was silenced from one of the two X-chromosomes in females and from the sole maternal-X in males. As a result, later-stage female Eedm-/- embryos displayed random X-inactivation. The kinetics of Xist RNA induction in Eedm-/- embryos resemble that of early human embryos, which lack oocyte-derived PRC2 and only undergo random X-inactivation. Thus, expression of PRC2 genes in the oocyte and transmission of the gene products to the embryo may dictate the occurrence of imprinted X-inactivation in mammals.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus domesticus x M. m. molossinus

PROVIDER: GSE123173 | GEO | 2019/05/02

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Non-genetic disease inheritance and offspring phenotype is substantially influenced by germline epigenetic programming, including genomic imprinting. Loss of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) function in oocytes causes non-genetically inherited effects on offspring, including embryonic growth restriction followed by post-natal offspring overgrowth. While PRC2 dependent non-canonical imprinting is likely to contribute, less is known about germline epigenetic programming of non-imprinted genes during oocyte growth. In addition, de novo germline mutations in genes encoding PRC2 lead to overgrowth syndromes in human patients, but the extent to which PRC2 activity is conserved in human oocytes is poorly understood. Results: In this study we identify a discrete period of early oocyte growth during which PRC2 is expressed in mouse growing oocytes. Deletion of Eed during this window led to the de-repression of 343 genes. A high proportion of these were developmental regulators, and the vast majority were not imprinted genes. Many of the de-repressed genes were also marked by the PRC2-dependent epigenetic modification histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) in primary-secondary mouse oocytes, at a time concurrent with PRC2 expression. In addition, we found H3K27me3 was also enriched on many of these genes by the germinal vesicle (GV) stage in human oocytes, strongly indicating that this PRC2 function is conserved in the human germline. However, while the 343 genes were de-repressed in mouse oocytes lacking EED, they were not de-repressed in pre-implantation embryos and lost H3K27me3 during pre-implantation development. This implies that H3K27me3 is a transient feature that represses a wide range of genes in oocytes. Conclusions: Together, these data indicate that EED has spatially and temporally distinct functions in the female germline to repress a wide range of developmentally important genes, and that this activity is conserved in the mouse and human germlines.

Dataset Information

Switching from Random to Imprinted X-inactivation by Maternal PRC2

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure