Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparative evaluation of RNA-Seq library preparation methods for strand-specificity and low input

ABSTRACT: Library preparation is a key step in gene expression quantification. There are considerable advantages to both strand specific sequencing and the ability to sequence samples with very small amounts of starting material. Until recently there was no kit available that allowed both simultaneously. The standard Illumina-TruSeq stranded mRNA Sample Preparation kit requires abundant starting quantity while the Takara Bio-SMART-Seq® v4 Ultra® Low Input RNA kit allows for ultra low starting quantities but sacrifices strand specificity. Recently a kit that can do both, SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 - Pico Input Mammalian by Takara Bio, has become available. Evaluating the performance and effects of these sample preparation kits is a critical determinant for selecting the appropriate sequencing protocol, but a comprehensive comparison is currently missing. To address this we performed a detailed comparative analysis of sequencing libraries prepared with the three kits. We prepared a set of samples representing two experimental conditions with each kit, allowing for comparison of the kits in a standard realistic differential expression analysis. We find substantial differences in the levels of alignment and differential gene expression. Using differential expression analysis we show that using Pico results in identifying 55% less differentially expressed genes than TruSeq. Nevertheless, using gene pathway enrichment analysis we find similar results for all three kits, indicating that ultimately comparable functional results can be reached.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE124167 | GEO | 2019/09/17

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: TruSeq)

Project description:In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of four RNA-Seq library preparation methods. We used three standard input protocols, the Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA and TruSeq Stranded mRNA kits, and a modified NuGEN Ovation v2 kit; and an ultra-low-input RNA protocol, the TaKaRa SMARTer Ultra Low RNA Kit v3. Our evaluation of these kits included quality control measures such as overall reproducibility, 5’ and 3’ end-bias, and the identification of DEGs, lncRNAs, and alternatively spliced transcripts. Overall, we found that the two Illumina kits were most similar in terms of recovering DEGs, and the Illumina, modified NuGEN, and TaKaRa kits allowed identification of a similar set of DEGs. However, we also discovered that the Illumina, NuGEN and TaKaRa kits each enriched for different sets of genes.

2019-06-27 | GSE131397 | GEO

Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: SMARTer)

2019-06-27 | GSE131396 | GEO

RNAseq in WT and Dnmt3a KO HSCs naive and after 1-month of infection with M. avium

Project description:5000-10000 HSCs (KL CD150+ CD48- CD34-) were sorted into lysis buffer from the pools of naive or 1-month infected WT or Dnmt3a-/- mice (n=10-12 per group). RNA was isolated with the NucleoSpin ® RNA Plus XS kit (Macherey Nagel). RNA-seq libraries were prepared by using SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 - Pico Input Mammalian (Takara Bio Usa). Illumina NovaSeq SP was used for sequencing with a paired-end sequencing length of 10bp. FASTQ files were preprocessed using HTS stream (https://github.com/ibest/HTStream) and the clean FASTQ file were aligned using STAR. Differential expression (DE) analysis of gene expression was performed using Limma-Voom. False discovery rate (FDR)<0.05 was considered statistically significant. We performed gene ontology analysis for differentially expressed genes with q value <0.05.

2021-03-23 | GSE169352 | GEO

scRNA-Seq from stroma vascular fraction of abdominal and gluteofemoral subcutaneous white adipose tissue

Project description:SVF was isolated from ABD and GF-adipose tissue biopsies by collagenase digestion and centrifugation, from 5 healthy women (38yo ±4.4; 31.8kg/m-2 ±3.12; WHR 0.86 ±0.05). After isolation, cells were counted with a Countess II automated cell counter (Thermofisher Scientific). Single cell suspension (56K/mL) was distributed into eight wells of a 384-well source plate (Takara Bio USA, San Jose, CA) and dispensed onto a iCELL8 350v Chip (Takara Bio USA) using an iCELL8 MultiSample NanoDispenser (Takara Bio USA). We distributed the ABD and GF-SVF of each subject on the same chip. The method used was described in [6]. In brief, mRNA from single cells were isolated, converted to full-length cDNA prior to unbiased amplification of 3’ and 5’ ends using SMART-Seq® ICELL8® Application Kit (Takara Bio, USA). Multiplexed sequencing libraries were generated from cDNA using the Illumina Nextera XT protocol and 150bp paired-end sequencing was performed on an Novogene HiSeqX instrument.

2024-02-23 | GSE255996 | GEO

Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq kits for standard, low and ultra-low quantity samples

Project description:High-throughput RNA-sequencing has now become the gold standard method for whole-transcriptome gene expression analysis. It is widely used in a number of applications studying various transcriptomes of cells and tissues. It is also being increasingly considered for a number of clinical applications, including expression profiling for diagnostics or alternative transcripts detection. However, RNA sequencing can be challenging in some situations, for instance due to low input quantities or degraded RNA samples. Several protocols have been proposed to overcome some of these challenges, and many are available as commercial kits. Here we perform a comprehensive testing of three recent commercial technologies for RNA-seq library preparation (Truseq, Smarter and Smarter Ultra-Low) on human reference tissue preparations, for standard (1ug), low (100 and 10 ng) and ultra-low (< 1 ng) input quantities, and for mRNA and total RNA, stranded or unstranded. We analyze the results using read quality and alignments metrics, gene detection and differential gene expression metrics. Overall, we show that the Truseq kit performs well at 100 ng input quantity, while the Smarter kit shows degraded performances for 100 and 10 ng input quantities, and that the Smarter Ultra-Low kit performs quite well for input quantities < 1 ng. All the results are discussed in details, and we provide guidelines for the selection of a RNA-seq library preparation kits by biologists.

2019-05-10 | GSE124198 | GEO

Extraction of Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins using three extraction methods

Project description:Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins are important players in the parasite’s pathogenicity. However, most of the proteins have not been identified. This study reports the membrane proteins extracted using three extractions methods: two commercial kits (ProteoExtract® from Calbiochem and ProteoPrep® from Sigma), and a conventional laboratory method. The resulting membrane fractions (MF) and cytosolic fractions (CF)were analysed using LC-ESI-MS/MS. The proteins identified in at least two out of three biological replicates revealed a total of 490, 492, and 587 MF proteins extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Meanwhile, 487, 611 and 343 proteins were identified in the CF extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Analysis of the identified MF and CF proteins extracted by the respective extraction kits suggests that the ProteoPrep® extraction kit was the most selective in separating MF and CF among the three extraction methods.

2018-10-16 | PXD010171 | Pride

Evaluation of three small RNA library preparation kits on serum-derived RNA

Project description:We evaluated the effect of the small RNA library preparation method on 5' tRNA-halves and miRNA abundance in libraries prepared from serum RNA using three commercially available small RNA library preparation kits (TruSeq small RNA library preparation kit v2 (Illumina), TailorMix miRNA sample preparation kit v2 (Seqmatic) and the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs)). RNA isolated from 100 µl of serum collected from healthy mice was used as input for the preparation of a small RNA library in duplicate and libraries were single end sequenced.

2017-02-22 | GSE88914 | GEO

RNA sequencing comparing the transcriptome of a severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) patient who progressed to AML (SCN-AML) with the SCN phase and healthy controls

Project description:CD34+ hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) from cryo-preserved blood or bone marrow were FACS sorted in TriZol and RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s protocol. SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA kit for sequencing (Clontech, v4 Cat# 634891) was used to generate cDNA. Sequencing libraries were generated using TruSeq Nano DNA Sample Preparation kits (Illumina, Cat# 20015964), according to the low sample protocol and paired-end sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 or Novaseq 6000 (both Illumina).

2020-08-24 | E-MTAB-9381 | biostudies-arrayexpress

m6a peak analysis in normal, FTO deficient and five stages of adipogenesis (D-2/0/2/5/10) in Mouse embryo fibroblast 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes

Project description:Total RNA was extracted using TRI® Reagent (Sigma). cDNA was synthesized by RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with Oligo dT primers (K1622, Fermentas) following manufacturer’s recommendations. PCR reactions were carried out on a DNAEngine® Thermal Cycler (PTC-0200G, Bio-Rad) in 25 μl reaction volume containing 1 μl cDNA, 200 nM primer pairs and components of TaKaRa Taq™ kit (R001A, Takara). All samples were analyzed in triplicate RT-qPCR.mRNAs were extracted using biotinylated poly(dT) oligo, followed by further removing of contaminated rRNA using RiboMinus Transcriptome Isolation Kit (K1550-02, Invitrogen). Then mRNAs were fragmented into 100-200nt length and subjected to immunoprecipitation with m6A specific antibody.The libraries were sequenced using HiSeq2000 (Illumina) in single-read mode, creating reads with a length of 101 bp. Sequencing chemistry v2 (Illumina) was used and samples were multiplexed in two samples per lane.

2015-03-09 | GSE53244 | GEO

Differences between fibroblasts derived from normal and IPF lungs

Project description:Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of IPF lungs in fibroblasts, we performed RNA-Sequencing of fibroblasts derived from normal and IPF lungs Method:　NHLF（Normal human lung fibroblast）　and DHLF-IPF (DIPF; Diseased human lung fibroblasts derived from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis)　were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA) .Total RNA was extracted from fibroblasts (NHLF and DIPF) using an RNeasy® Mini Kit (#74106; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Preparation of a next-generation sequencing library was performed using a SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA Sample Prep Kit–Pico Input Mammalian (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform in 75-base single-end mode with Illumina Casava 1.8.2 software for base calling. Sequenced reads were mapped to the human reference genome sequence (hg19) using TopHat v.2.0.13 software, in combination with Bowtie 2 v.2.2.3 and SAMtools v.0.1.19. Result: Of the 26,257 genes analyzed, for NHLF and DHLF-IPF (DIPF), FPKM was required to be greater than or equal to 0.3. Under these conditions, 764 genes were up regulated inDHLF-IPF (DIPF) and 691 genes were down regulated.

2021-10-06 | GSE185259 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data