Gene expression analysis in HLHS iPSCs, iPSC-derived cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE135411 | GEO | 2021/11/02
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We investigate the impact of DNA methylation on epiblast differentiation. To this end, we used in vitro Epiblast-like cell (EpiLC) differentiation on WT and DNA-methylation free TKO murine ESCs. We next performed bulk RNAseq at D0, D2, D4, D6 and D8 of differentiation to study transcriptomic differences.
2023-10-09 | GSE214461 | GEO
Project description:We investigate the impact of DNA methylation on epiblast differentiation. To this end, we used in vitro Epiblast-like cell (EpiLC) differentiation on WT and DNA-methylation free TKO murine ESCs. We next performed bulk RNAseq at D0, D2, D4, D6 and D8 of differentiation to study transcriptomic differences.
2023-10-09 | GSE214459 | GEO
Project description:We investigate the impact of DNA methylation on neural somatic differentiation. To this end, we used in vitro neural progenitor cell (NPC) differentiation on WT and DNA-methylation free TKO murine ESCs. We next performed bulk RNAseq at D0, D2, D4, D6 and D8 of differentiation to study transcriptomic differences.
2023-10-09 | GSE214460 | GEO
Project description:Pathological variants in NOTCH1 have been implicated in multiple types of congenital heart defects including bicuspid aortic valve and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). To probe how NOTCH1 deficiency affects cardiac development, we generated homozygous NOTCH1 knockout (N1KO) human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We then ran single-cell RNA-seq to temporally profile transcriptomic changes during cardiac differentiation in wild type (WT) and N1KO iPSCs. We collected differentiating cells at multiple time points corresponding to different development stages, i.e., Day 0 (D0: pluripotent stem cell), D2 (mesoderm), D5 (cardiac mesoderm), D10 (cardiac progenitor), D14 (early cardiomyocyte), and D30 (fetal cardiomyocyte). Single-cell transcriptomics analysis reveals that NOTCH1 disruption impairs human ventricular cardiomyocyte differentiation and proliferation through balancing cell fate determination of cardiac mesoderm toward the first heart field, second heart field, and epicardial lineages.
2022-12-21 | GSE196632 | GEO
Project description:To capture the swift changes in gene expression upon INO80-OE, we performed time-coursed (D0, D2, D4, and D6) RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) following INO80 induction.
2024-01-04 | GSE240180 | GEO
Project description:Subcutaneous preadipocyte differentiation play a critical role in fat deposition of pigs. However, the action of different RNAs in subcutaneous preadipocyte differentiation, such as messenger RNAs (mRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), are still largely unclear. In the present study, a transcriptome analysis including mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs was performed in different stages of D0, D2, D4, and D8 using RNA-seq technology. Our results identified 1,554, 470, 1,344, 1,777, and 676 differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs, 112, 58, 95, 136, and 93 DE lncRNAs, and 902, 787, 710, 932, and 850 DE circRNAs between D2 and D0, between D4 and D2, between D8 and D4, between D4 and D0, and between D8 and D0, respectively. Moreover, functional enrichment analysis showed that the common DE mRNAs during entire differentiation were mainly involved in lipid metabolic and cell differentiation processes. Additionally, co-expression network analysis identified the potential lncRNAs related to adipogenesis, e.g., MSTRG.42239 and MSTRG.146410. Taken together, this study provides a genome-wide landscape of RNA expression profiles during subcutaneous preadipocyte differentiation, thus improving our understanding of molecular mechanism in regulating subcutaneous adipogenesis of pigs.
2018-11-14 | GSE114583 | GEO
Project description:Intervention1: Bevacizumab
Biosimilar: Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) will be administered initially as a 90-minute infusion
Control Intervention1: AVASTIN (Roche/Genentech: Avastin (5 mg/kg) will be administered initially as a 90-minute infusion
Primary outcome(s): To compare the PK profile of Bevacizumab and AvastinÂ, both administered in combination with FOLFOX (any) or FOLFIRI.Timepoint: Cycle 1:
0 h(pre-infusion), end of infusion; 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h (D2), 48h (D3),72h (D4), 120h (D6), 168 h (D8) & 240 h (D11) after end of infusion.Cycle 2- Cycle 5: 0 h(pre-infusion), end of infusion on D1 of Cycles 2 and 5
Cycle 7:
0h, end of infusion; 1 h, 2 h, 6 h after end of infusion on
D1 and thereafter one sample at 24 h (D2), 48 h (D3), 72 h (D4), 120 h
(D6), 168 h (D8), 240 h (D11) after end of infusion
(Cycle 7)and 336 h(D15, just before the start of the bevacizumab of Cycle 8
Study Design: Randomized, Parallel Group Trial
Method of generating randomization sequence:Computer generated randomization Method of allocation concealment:Centralized Blinding and masking:Open Label
| 2575730 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:MAPK cascade in solution (no scaffold)
Description
This model describes a basic 3-
stage Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK)
cascade in solution. This cascade is typically expressed as RAF=
=>MEK==>MAPK (alternative forms are K3==>K2==>
K1 and KKK==>KK==>K)
. The input signal is RAFK (RAF Kinase)
and the output signal is MAPKpp (
doubly phosphorylated form of MAPK)
. RAFK phosphorylates RAF once to RAFp. RAFp,
the phosphorylated form of RAF induces two phoshporylations of MEK,
to MEKp and MEKpp. MEKpp,
the doubly phosphorylated form of MEK,
induces two phosphorylations of MAPK to MAPKp and MAPKpp.
Rate constant
Reaction
a10 = 5.
MAPKPH + MAPKpp -> MAPKppMAPKPH
a1 = 1.
RAF + RAFK -> RAFRAFK
a2 = 0.5
RAFp + RAFPH -> RAFpRAFPH
a3 = 3.3
MEK + RAFp -> MEKRAFp
a4 = 10.
MEKp + MEKPH -> MEKpMEKPH
a5 = 3.3
MEKp + RAFp -> MEKpRAFp
a6 = 10.
MEKPH + MEKpp -> MEKppMEKPH
a7 = 20.
MAPK + MEKpp -> MAPKMEKpp
a8 = 5.
MAPKp + MAPKPH -> MAPKpMAPKPH
a9 = 20.
MAPKp + MEKpp -> MAPKpMEKpp
d10 = 0.4
MAPKppMAPKPH -> MAPKPH + MAPKpp
d1 = 0.4
RAFRAFK -> RAF + RAFK
d2 = 0.5
RAFpRAFPH -> RAFp + RAFPH
d3 = 0.42
MEKRAFp -> MEK + RAFp
d4 = 0.8
MEKpMEKPH -> MEKp + MEKPH
d5 = 0.4
MEKpRAFp -> MEKp + RAFp
d6 = 0.8
MEKppMEKPH -> MEKPH + MEKpp
d7 = 0.6
MAPKMEKpp -> MAPK + MEKpp
d8 = 0.4
MAPKpMAPKPH -> MAPKp + MAPKPH
d9 = 0.6
MAPKpMEKpp -> MAPKp + MEKpp
k10 = 0.1
MAPKppMAPKPH -> MAPKp + MAPKPH
k1 = 0.1
RAFRAFK -> RAFK + RAFp
k2 = 0.1
RAFpRAFPH -> RAF + RAFPH
k3 = 0.1
MEKRAFp -> MEKp + RAFp
k4 = 0.1
MEKpMEKPH -> MEK + MEKPH
k5 = 0.1
MEKpRAFp -> MEKpp + RAFp
k6 = 0.1
MEKppMEKPH -> MEKp + MEKPH
k7 = 0.1
MAPKMEKpp -> MAPKp + MEKpp
k8 = 0.1
MAPKpMAPKPH -> MAPK + MAPKPH
k9 = 0.1
MAPKpMEKpp -> MAPKpp + MEKpp
Variable
IC
ODE
MAPK
0.3
MAPK'[t] == d7*MAPKMEKpp[t] + k8*MAPKpMAPKPH[t] -
a7*MAPK[t]*MEKpp[t]
MAPKMEKpp
0
MAPKMEKpp'[t] == -(d7*MAPKMEKpp[t]) - k7*MAPKMEKpp[t]
+ a7*MAPK[t]*MEKpp[t]
MAPKp
0
MAPKp'[t] == k7*MAPKMEKpp[t] - a8*MAPKp[t]*MAPKPH[t]
+ d8*MAPKpMAPKPH[t] + d9*MAPKpMEKpp[t] + k10*
MAPKppMAPKPH[t] - a9*MAPKp[t]*MEKpp[t]
MAPKPH
0.3
MAPKPH'[t] == -(a8*MAPKp[t]*MAPKPH[t]) + d8*MAPKpMAPKPH[
t] + k8*MAPKpMAPKPH[t] - a10*MAPKPH[t]*MAPKpp[t] +
d10*MAPKppMAPKPH[t] + k10*MAPKppMAPKPH[t]
MAPKpMAPKPH
0
MAPKpMAPKPH'[t] == a8*MAPKp[t]*MAPKPH[t] - d8*
MAPKpMAPKPH[t] - k8*MAPKpMAPKPH[t]
MAPKpMEKpp
0
MAPKpMEKpp'[t] == -(d9*MAPKpMEKpp[t]) - k9*MAPKpMEKpp[t]
+ a9*MAPKp[t]*MEKpp[t]
MAPKpp
0
MAPKpp'[t] == k9*MAPKpMEKpp[t] - a10*MAPKPH[t]*MAPKpp[t]
+ d10*MAPKppMAPKPH[t]
MAPKppMAPKPH
0
MAPKppMAPKPH'[t] == a10*MAPKPH[t]*MAPKpp[t] - d10*
MAPKppMAPKPH[t] - k10*MAPKppMAPKPH[t]
MEK
0.2
MEK'[t] == k4*MEKpMEKPH[t] + d3*MEKRAFp[t] -
a3*MEK[t]*RAFp[t]
MEKp
0
MEKp'[t] == -(a4*MEKp[t]*MEKPH[t]) + d4*MEKpMEKPH[t]
+ k6*MEKppMEKPH[t] + d5*MEKpRAFp[t] + k3*MEKRAFp[
t] - a5*MEKp[t]*RAFp[t]
MEKPH
0.2
MEKPH'[t] == -(a4*MEKp[t]*MEKPH[t]) + d4*MEKpMEKPH[t]
+ k4*MEKpMEKPH[t] - a6*MEKPH[t]*MEKpp[t] + d6*
MEKppMEKPH[t] + k6*MEKppMEKPH[t]
MEKpMEKPH
0
MEKpMEKPH'[t] == a4*MEKp[t]*MEKPH[t] - d4*MEKpMEKPH[t]
- k4*MEKpMEKPH[t]
MEKpp
0
MEKpp'[t] == d7*MAPKMEKpp[t] + k7*MAPKMEKpp[t] +
d9*MAPKpMEKpp[t] + k9*MAPKpMEKpp[t] - a7*MAPK[t]*
MEKpp[t] - a9*MAPKp[t]*MEKpp[t] - a6*MEKPH[t]*MEKpp[t]
+ d6*MEKppMEKPH[t] + k5*MEKpRAFp[t]
MEKppMEKPH
0
MEKppMEKPH'[t] == a6*MEKPH[t]*MEKpp[t] - d6*MEKppMEKPH[
t] - k6*MEKppMEKPH[t]
MEKpRAFp
0
MEKpRAFp'[t] == -(d5*MEKpRAFp[t]) - k5*MEKpRAFp[t]
+ a5*MEKp[t]*RAFp[t]
MEKRAFp
0
MEKRAFp'[t] == -(d3*MEKRAFp[t]) - k3*MEKRAFp[t] +
a3*MEK[t]*RAFp[t]
RAF
0.4
RAF'[t] == -(a1*RAF[t]*RAFK[t]) + k2*RAFpRAFPH[t] +
d1*RAFRAFK[t]
RAFK
0.1
RAFK'[t] == -(a1*RAF[t]*RAFK[t]) + d1*RAFRAFK[t] +
k1*RAFRAFK[t]
RAFp
0
RAFp'[t] == d5*MEKpRAFp[t] + k5*MEKpRAFp[t] +
d3*MEKRAFp[t] + k3*MEKRAFp[t] - a3*MEK[t]*RAFp[t]
- a5*MEKp[t]*RAFp[t] - a2*RAFp[t]*RAFPH[t] + d2*
RAFpRAFPH[t] + k1*RAFRAFK[t]
RAFPH
0.3
RAFPH'[t] == -(a2*RAFp[t]*RAFPH[t]) + d2*RAFpRAFPH[t]
+ k2*RAFpRAFPH[t]
RAFpRAFPH
0
RAFpRAFPH'[t] == a2*RAFp[t]*RAFPH[t] - d2*RAFpRAFPH[t]
- k2*RAFpRAFPH[t]
RAFRAFK
0
RAFRAFK'[t] == a1*RAF[t]*RAFK[t] - d1*RAFRAFK[t] -
k1*RAFRAFK[t]
Generated by Cellerator Version 1.4.3 (6-March-2004) using Mathematica 5.0
for Mac OS X (November 19, 2003), March 6, 2004 12:18:07, using (PowerMac,
PowerPC,Mac OS X,MacOSX,Darwin)
author=B.E.Shapiro
This model originates from BioModels Database: A Database of Annotated Published Models (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/). It is copyright (c) 2005-2010 The BioModels.net Team.
For more information see the terms of use
.
To cite BioModels Database, please use: Li C, Donizelli M, Rodriguez N, Dharuri H, Endler L, Chelliah V, Li L, He E, Henry A, Stefan MI, Snoep JL, Hucka M, Le Novère N, Laibe C (2010) BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models. BMC Syst Biol., 4:92.
2005-02-15 | BIOMD0000000011 | BioModels
Project description:To systematically identify lncRNAs involved in muscle cell differentiation, the lncRNA microarrays was used to identify differentially expressed lncRNAs during C2C12 cells differentiation (Proliferation myoblast and 2, 5, 8 days after differentiation, represented by D0, D2, D5 and D8. respectively)
2019-07-31 | GSE102098 | GEO
Project description:The equine endometrium exhibits characteristic morphological and functional changes during the estrous cycle controlled by the interplay of progesterone and estradiol. A microarray analysis of endometrial tissue samples derived from 5 time points of the estrous cycle (D0, D3, D8, D12, and D16) was performed to study the dynamics of endometrial gene expression. Endometrial biopsies were collected from five mares (Bavarian Warmblood) at the respective time points. Samples were divided and subjected to isolation of RNA for microarray analysis and analysis of tissue composition. Blood samples were collected to determine serum progesterone levels for every sample. Statistical analysis of microarray data revealed almost 10,000 differential probes corresponding to 4,996 differentially expressed genes. A cluster analysis based on gene expression profiles during the estrous cycle revealed 8 major gene expression profiles: mRNAs with highest levels 1) at D0, 2) from D0 to D3, 3) at D3, 4) from D3 to D8, 5) at D8, 6) from D8 to D12, 7) from D12 to D16, and 8) at D16. DAVID Functional Annotation Clustering revealed overrepresentation of distinct functional terms in different phases of the cycle, e.g. ‘extracellular matrix’ and ‘protein transport’ during estrus, ‘DNA replication and ‘cell cycle’ during early luteal phase, ‘endoplasmic reticulum’ and ‘protein transport’ in the luteal phase, and ‘inflammatory response’ in the late luteal and follicular phase. Expression of selected genes of the expression clusters was validated by quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR). This study provides new insights into global changes of equine endometrial gene expression during the estrous cycle.
2012-10-23 | GSE39043 | GEO